yes
Forum > Suggestions > Allow Cb4 to move around like CB2
Pwned
offline
offline
Originally posted by Thundercat_12
Thundercat approves about time Wu did or came up with something worthwhile
i know rite?
Thundercat approves about time Wu did or came up with something worthwhile
i know rite?
Pwned
offline
offline
Originally posted by CDZYO
-1. Set CB2 -> WR1, CB4 -> WR2, and FS -> WR3, and you have the makings of an ugly double-CB overload blitz without the benefit of TE blocking. No thanks.
So test the alignments and make sure the overload blitz isn't 100% effective.
More positivity in the mind is needed from you sir!
-1. Set CB2 -> WR1, CB4 -> WR2, and FS -> WR3, and you have the makings of an ugly double-CB overload blitz without the benefit of TE blocking. No thanks.
So test the alignments and make sure the overload blitz isn't 100% effective.
More positivity in the mind is needed from you sir!
CDZYO
offline
offline
Originally posted by Pwned IRL
So test the alignments and make sure the overload blitz isn't 100% effective.
More positivity in the mind is needed from you sir!
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4851163, among others.
Given the sad state of blocking 20+ seasons running and Bort's inability to address it in any meaningful fashion, the unwillingness of GLB authorities to test issues as fundamental as whether auto-adjust or certain VAs and SAs are working as intended, the fact that the reason the DPC was nerfed in the first place was because of exploit blitzes, the widely-held belief that exploit blitzes under the nerfed DPC have made four-wide and five-wide sets essentially useless for downfield passing outside of casual, and that moving CB4 weakside isn't even necessary (given that the OP can swap CB2 and CB4 and accomplish the same task), I think my glasses are colored with the roses of gods, thankyewveddymuch. I simply have a difference of opinion.
So test the alignments and make sure the overload blitz isn't 100% effective.
More positivity in the mind is needed from you sir!
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4851163, among others.
Given the sad state of blocking 20+ seasons running and Bort's inability to address it in any meaningful fashion, the unwillingness of GLB authorities to test issues as fundamental as whether auto-adjust or certain VAs and SAs are working as intended, the fact that the reason the DPC was nerfed in the first place was because of exploit blitzes, the widely-held belief that exploit blitzes under the nerfed DPC have made four-wide and five-wide sets essentially useless for downfield passing outside of casual, and that moving CB4 weakside isn't even necessary (given that the OP can swap CB2 and CB4 and accomplish the same task), I think my glasses are colored with the roses of gods, thankyewveddymuch. I simply have a difference of opinion.
Originally posted by CDZYO
moving CB4 weakside isn't even necessary (given that the OP can swap CB2 and CB4 and accomplish the same task), I think my glasses are colored with the roses of gods, thankyewveddymuch. I simply have a difference of opinion.
ok what if I use a blitzing CB at CB2? I did just that this past season.
I can blitz them from the weak OR strong side, but that is not what I want. If I'm using Cb2 for something else (like covering the HB or TE) then why not be able to move the 4th CB to the side of the trips?
moving CB4 weakside isn't even necessary (given that the OP can swap CB2 and CB4 and accomplish the same task), I think my glasses are colored with the roses of gods, thankyewveddymuch. I simply have a difference of opinion.
ok what if I use a blitzing CB at CB2? I did just that this past season.
I can blitz them from the weak OR strong side, but that is not what I want. If I'm using Cb2 for something else (like covering the HB or TE) then why not be able to move the 4th CB to the side of the trips?
Ubasstards
offline
offline
Originally posted by CDZYO
-1. Set CB2 -> WR1, CB4 -> WR2, and FS -> WR3, and you have the makings of an ugly double-CB overload blitz without the benefit of TE blocking. No thanks.
i cant support this if it is this easily exploitable
-1. Set CB2 -> WR1, CB4 -> WR2, and FS -> WR3, and you have the makings of an ugly double-CB overload blitz without the benefit of TE blocking. No thanks.
i cant support this if it is this easily exploitable
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
