Warrior General Games

Originally posted by All American Dude
But this suggestion would give that team credit for being owned by the same person for a long period of time despite the fact it has been beyond terrible for 6 consecutive seasons.


Well then put a stipulation that only seasons where a certain % of the roster was human players counts. I don't care. Don't discount what I've did with my main team b/c I also own another team that started at the bottom, made it to the top and then went back down where it progressed again, but b/c Cas is limited in what can be done we had to move them to a real team. I think you are really missing the point on what this suggestion is for. Also, I'm done arguing with you as you can't comprehend or even acknowledge my main team.

You get credit for what you've done in the form of trophies.

I'm cool with a team getting a plaque or something for X amount of wins.

Originally posted by harschman
Well then put a stipulation that only seasons where a certain % of the roster was human players counts. I don't care. Don't discount what I've did with my main team b/c I also own another team that started at the bottom, made it to the top and then went back down where it progressed again, but b/c Cas is limited in what can be done we had to move them to a real team. I think you are really missing the point on what this suggestion is for. Also, I'm done arguing with you as you can't comprehend or even acknowledge my main team.

It is you that can't comprehend. This thread is not about your team. Was using one of your teams as an illustration. Not to mention you have 4 fucking teams named Arkadak and the one you are touting is the last one on your profile. Saw the one with the S14 trophy first.

What OP suggests is well within reason

Example:
Team Owner owns a team 10 seasons,thats 400 flex per season which would equal 4000 Flex spent on owning a that team.
Why not reward that owner reguadless of the teams success?

Originally posted by Team Nucleus
What OP suggests is well within reason

Team Owner owns a team 10 seasons,thats 400 flex per season which would equal 4000 Flex spent on owning a that team.
Why not reward that owner reguadless of the teams success?


I'm pretty sure that if he doesn't drop the flex part this is going to get locked as tying flex into winning is NGTH. Best keep it to trophy or something of the like.

Maybe for every 10 seasons you get 1 free season or something.
Trophies would be a good enough addition though

I can see what AAD is saying and it makes sense ironically. and I say that as I hadn't even looked at the points he has brought up when I agreed with the suggestion. I am not going to call anyones teams out but I just do not see it as right to give a reward for owning a team for a long period of time if the team is a crappy team. there should be stipulations on what a team has to do to get the rewards. just owning a team isn't enough the team needs to have atleast been somewhat competitive. and flex should not be tied into this or it will never get anywhere. so trophies or a special plague or something along those lines would be a just reward for longevity of a competitive team.

Giving agents flex for their player's performance is on the NGTH list. Giving a team owner flex for having a team for a lengthy period of time is basically the same thing.

To be honest, myself and others that have owned many different teams have spent much more on ownership than people that have kept the same team for a lengthy period of time. The op's math is off.

For example: 10 seasons

Dub J:

Buy a regular team for 1000 flex.
Sell team back 4 seasons later after spending 800 to renew.
Buy another regular team immediately for 1000 flex.
Sell team back after 2 seasons.
Buy another team for 1000 flex.
Sell team back 4 seasons later after spending 800 to renew.
= 4600 flex

Owner with same team for 10 seasons:

Buy a regular team for 1000 flex.
Spend 3200 flex for 8 seasons renewal.
= 4200 flex

Originally posted by All American Dude
It is you that can't comprehend. This thread is not about your team. Was using one of your teams as an illustration. Not to mention you have 4 fucking teams named Arkadak and the one you are touting is the last one on your profile. Saw the one with the S14 trophy first.

Well if I could change the order I would, but it goes by the team number and AR has the highest number. It's also listed under the team name what league the team is in so that should have been a clue when I referenced my EE Pro team.

Either way, I agree owning a team and it being non-competitive shouldn't count for anything, but owning a team and being competitive for 20+ seasons should.

Originally posted by TaySC
Agreed.

I have owned mine since around D8 of S2 and there is absolutely no benefit.

Having said that, I also am sure this will quickly become one of the NGTH topics.


why would it ever be added to NGTH?

if it ever does, it's retarded.

cost of owning a team after X number of seasons would be great

how about after 5 seasons it goes down to 350, 10 300, 15 250, 20+ 200

Originally posted by VietCampo
cost of owning a team after X number of seasons would be great

how about after 5 seasons it goes down to 350, 10 300, 15 250, 20+ 200

I wouldn't mind that either.

Originally posted by All American Dude
Originally posted by harschman

+1

Long time owner here. I support this. We should have some type of recognition as there aren't many of us around anymore.

Arkadak owner for 22 seasons and counting.

Not trying to be a dick but there are teams that have only been around for a couple of seasons that have accomplished more than you have in 22. Your team actually makes a strong argument against this suggestion. Your team has gone 12-84 over the last 6 seasons (including three 0-16 seasons and two 1-15 seasons).


Guess I'm going to change my vote to a -1. If you've been around long enough and done anything noteworthy it will show in your trophy case. It's ridiculous just to give recognition for owning a team for a long time regardless of whether or not it's had any measure of success.

This misses the point that having a team period is helpful to GLB.

Teams that serve as homes for the badly built dots are still making Bort money.

The whole idea to reward a long term paying customer. Not as another avenue of competition.

nmind misread your post

Originally posted by yello1
nmind misread your post

now that is a shocker