RBs already supposedly make "chip blocks" when going on pass patterns, no?
Forum > Suggestions > fix it so that one blocker is not able to block two or more defenders at the same time
We_Rule
offline
offline
Originally posted by ron2288
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2303567 this guy should beable to block weak Cb's
All joking a side +1 to Op..seeing 3 and 4 dots getting help up by one dot is silly
Almost as silly as watching a weakling CB turning 180 degrees and making a tackle against a PHB twice his size, all while being currently engaged with the blocker (whether it be TE/WR/whatever)? If we're going all "realism" all of a sudden, it should prb go both ways right?
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2303567 this guy should beable to block weak Cb's
All joking a side +1 to Op..seeing 3 and 4 dots getting help up by one dot is silly
Almost as silly as watching a weakling CB turning 180 degrees and making a tackle against a PHB twice his size, all while being currently engaged with the blocker (whether it be TE/WR/whatever)? If we're going all "realism" all of a sudden, it should prb go both ways right?
SikoraP13 DTD
offline
offline
Originally posted by We_Rule
Almost as silly as watching a weakling CB turning 180 degrees and making a tackle against a PHB twice his size, all while being currently engaged with the blocker (whether it be TE/WR/whatever)? If we're going all "realism" all of a sudden, it should prb go both ways right?
true but its a lot more realistic to lunge sideways at a guy and make a tackle by shedding the block or just diving and taking out his ankles, or even just falling and tripping him up, than it is to have one blocker hold back 3 guys
Almost as silly as watching a weakling CB turning 180 degrees and making a tackle against a PHB twice his size, all while being currently engaged with the blocker (whether it be TE/WR/whatever)? If we're going all "realism" all of a sudden, it should prb go both ways right?
true but its a lot more realistic to lunge sideways at a guy and make a tackle by shedding the block or just diving and taking out his ankles, or even just falling and tripping him up, than it is to have one blocker hold back 3 guys
Originally posted by We_Rule
Almost as silly as watching a weakling CB turning 180 degrees and making a tackle against a PHB twice his size, all while being currently engaged with the blocker (whether it be TE/WR/whatever)? If we're going all "realism" all of a sudden, it should prb go both ways right?
Power HBs still have shoe laces. Little guys take down big guys it happens.
The 180 degree thing, alot of the pathing etc is borked all around though. Or at least how its drawn on the screen anyway, which is all we have to go on.
Almost as silly as watching a weakling CB turning 180 degrees and making a tackle against a PHB twice his size, all while being currently engaged with the blocker (whether it be TE/WR/whatever)? If we're going all "realism" all of a sudden, it should prb go both ways right?
Power HBs still have shoe laces. Little guys take down big guys it happens.
The 180 degree thing, alot of the pathing etc is borked all around though. Or at least how its drawn on the screen anyway, which is all we have to go on.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by Deathblade
alt; base it on the blocking ability of the player, and make blocking have a bigger impact on blocking ability
nah, that just makes too much sense bro
alt; base it on the blocking ability of the player, and make blocking have a bigger impact on blocking ability
nah, that just makes too much sense bro
Outlaw Dogs
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
Originally posted by Deathblade
alt; base it on the blocking ability of the player, and make blocking have a bigger impact on blocking ability
nah, that just makes too much sense bro
Originally posted by Deathblade
alt; base it on the blocking ability of the player, and make blocking have a bigger impact on blocking ability
nah, that just makes too much sense bro
Originally posted by Toriq
RBs already supposedly make "chip blocks" when going on pass patterns, no?
Dunno, maybe?
RBs already supposedly make "chip blocks" when going on pass patterns, no?
Dunno, maybe?
Outlaw Dogs
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by Toriq
RBs already supposedly make "chip blocks" when going on pass patterns, no?
Dunno, maybe?
There's a forum for that.
Originally posted by Toriq
RBs already supposedly make "chip blocks" when going on pass patterns, no?
Dunno, maybe?
There's a forum for that.
Originally posted by wormser1971
Lets not forget the RBs and WRs that run straight into a defensive player that is engaged in a block rather than go around.... Still a lot of issues in the sim
THis happens as much or more than double blocking. You fix double blocking by repositioning your dots.
-1
Lets not forget the RBs and WRs that run straight into a defensive player that is engaged in a block rather than go around.... Still a lot of issues in the sim
THis happens as much or more than double blocking. You fix double blocking by repositioning your dots.
-1
Originally posted by TenTwo
Originally posted by wormser1971
Lets not forget the RBs and WRs that run straight into a defensive player that is engaged in a block rather than go around.... Still a lot of issues in the sim
THis happens as much or more than double blocking. You fix double blocking by repositioning your dots.
-1
You shouldnt have to build your gameplan around crappy pathing.
The crappy pathing should be fixed.
Originally posted by wormser1971
Lets not forget the RBs and WRs that run straight into a defensive player that is engaged in a block rather than go around.... Still a lot of issues in the sim
THis happens as much or more than double blocking. You fix double blocking by repositioning your dots.
-1
You shouldnt have to build your gameplan around crappy pathing.
The crappy pathing should be fixed.
you want things fixed so that you do not have to do anything at all. seriously take a step back and think if GLB fixed every problem you have with the site what the hell would you have to bitch about then?
Originally posted by hatchman
you want things fixed so that you do not have to do anything at all. seriously take a step back and think if GLB fixed every problem you have with the site what the hell would you have to bitch about then?
Your logic would have us all standing in front of our cars turning the crank shaft by hand every morning.
you want things fixed so that you do not have to do anything at all. seriously take a step back and think if GLB fixed every problem you have with the site what the hell would you have to bitch about then?
Your logic would have us all standing in front of our cars turning the crank shaft by hand every morning.
Originally posted by yello1
Your logic would have us all standing in front of our cars turning the crank shaft by hand every morning.
no improvement is fine but your shotgun approach to suggestions is just a simple pain in the ass for most of us. we comment on your suggestions and actually try to help you and everyone else. seriously the few good ideas you have had I +1ed them and moved on since those suggestions were decent ones that would help the game overall. but most of your suggestions are driven by you and your teams problems. suggestions are supposed to be about making the game better. not about making yello1's teams better because he is not capable of doing so himself.
Your logic would have us all standing in front of our cars turning the crank shaft by hand every morning.
no improvement is fine but your shotgun approach to suggestions is just a simple pain in the ass for most of us. we comment on your suggestions and actually try to help you and everyone else. seriously the few good ideas you have had I +1ed them and moved on since those suggestions were decent ones that would help the game overall. but most of your suggestions are driven by you and your teams problems. suggestions are supposed to be about making the game better. not about making yello1's teams better because he is not capable of doing so himself.
Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by yello1
Your logic would have us all standing in front of our cars turning the crank shaft by hand every morning.
no improvement is fine but your shotgun approach to suggestions is just a simple pain in the ass for most of us. we comment on your suggestions and actually try to help you and everyone else. seriously the few good ideas you have had I +1ed them and moved on since those suggestions were decent ones that would help the game overall. but most of your suggestions are driven by you and your teams problems. suggestions are supposed to be about making the game better. not about making yello1's teams better because he is not capable of doing so himself.
For someone who spends so much time on a forum its immensely LOL that you consider posts on a forum to be a pain in the ass.
And there you go again judging my ideas for why I make them. I smell soup.
And, again, my suggestions are ALWAYS about making the game better.
Originally posted by yello1
Your logic would have us all standing in front of our cars turning the crank shaft by hand every morning.
no improvement is fine but your shotgun approach to suggestions is just a simple pain in the ass for most of us. we comment on your suggestions and actually try to help you and everyone else. seriously the few good ideas you have had I +1ed them and moved on since those suggestions were decent ones that would help the game overall. but most of your suggestions are driven by you and your teams problems. suggestions are supposed to be about making the game better. not about making yello1's teams better because he is not capable of doing so himself.
For someone who spends so much time on a forum its immensely LOL that you consider posts on a forum to be a pain in the ass.
And there you go again judging my ideas for why I make them. I smell soup.
And, again, my suggestions are ALWAYS about making the game better.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
