Originally posted by Brett Snyder
GG Durham, pretty close game.
gg
GG Durham, pretty close game.
gg
OtisDriftwood
offline
offline
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
what a shit sim. http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1723840&pbp_id=2833594
use that next time to throw the ball to the TE's....But yes it is a bug
how is that a bug, its GL strong side screen. Whats buggy about it?
Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
what a shit sim. http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1723840&pbp_id=2833594
use that next time to throw the ball to the TE's....But yes it is a bug
how is that a bug, its GL strong side screen. Whats buggy about it?
TrevJo
offline
offline
Originally posted by OtisDriftwood
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
what a shit sim. http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1723840&pbp_id=2833594
use that next time to throw the ball to the TE's....But yes it is a bug
how is that a bug, its GL strong side screen. Whats buggy about it?
The field is the wrong size
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
what a shit sim. http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1723840&pbp_id=2833594
use that next time to throw the ball to the TE's....But yes it is a bug
how is that a bug, its GL strong side screen. Whats buggy about it?
The field is the wrong size
bigg987
offline
offline
Originally posted by stumanroo
As always Raging...Very GG! One big run was the difference really.
that and turnovers and our morale looked like we belonged in peewee
oh well, still a damn good game. maybe we will win the next one
As always Raging...Very GG! One big run was the difference really.
that and turnovers and our morale looked like we belonged in peewee
oh well, still a damn good game. maybe we will win the next one
Triathlon Dude
offline
offline
Originally posted by OtisDriftwood
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
what a shit sim. http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1723840&pbp_id=2833594
use that next time to throw the ball to the TE's....But yes it is a bug
how is that a bug, its GL strong side screen. Whats buggy about it?
look at the TE's....they aren't even trying to find a defender
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
what a shit sim. http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1723840&pbp_id=2833594
use that next time to throw the ball to the TE's....But yes it is a bug
how is that a bug, its GL strong side screen. Whats buggy about it?
look at the TE's....they aren't even trying to find a defender
CoachCoughlin
offline
offline
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
how is that a bug, its GL strong side screen. Whats buggy about it?
look at the TE's....they aren't even trying to find a defender
TEs need more vision imo
how is that a bug, its GL strong side screen. Whats buggy about it?
look at the TE's....they aren't even trying to find a defender
TEs need more vision imo
Originally posted by bigg987
that and turnovers and our morale looked like we belonged in peewee
oh well, still a damn good game. maybe we will win the next one
Depends...if both of us are here next season and that is the next game I will bet that you will win...cause this season is the end of a majority of this roster...then the Garage Rockers come over. So next season we will be young and in Chemistry if we are still here...likely be in chemistry hell if we are in WL too...in fact even if we win I may decline WL due to the roster.
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Next time though try to get one out side of ST
If you would really like I can go back and come up with a number somewhere around 25-30% of them are actually NOT on special Teams...which is sad since he has played 2nd or 3rd SS (out of 3 on the charts) the last few seasons. And he likely gets about 25-30% of his snaps on defense...so it works out about right tbh!
that and turnovers and our morale looked like we belonged in peewee
oh well, still a damn good game. maybe we will win the next one
Depends...if both of us are here next season and that is the next game I will bet that you will win...cause this season is the end of a majority of this roster...then the Garage Rockers come over. So next season we will be young and in Chemistry if we are still here...likely be in chemistry hell if we are in WL too...in fact even if we win I may decline WL due to the roster.
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Next time though try to get one out side of ST
If you would really like I can go back and come up with a number somewhere around 25-30% of them are actually NOT on special Teams...which is sad since he has played 2nd or 3rd SS (out of 3 on the charts) the last few seasons. And he likely gets about 25-30% of his snaps on defense...so it works out about right tbh!
The play worked a little bit...obviously the D is too under on that play...
Triathlon Dude
offline
offline
Originally posted by stumanroo
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Next time though try to get one out side of ST
If you would really like I can go back and come up with a number somewhere around 25-30% of them are actually NOT on special Teams...which is sad since he has played 2nd or 3rd SS (out of 3 on the charts) the last few seasons. And he likely gets about 25-30% of his snaps on defense...so it works out about right tbh!
So far this season has only been on ST, which was my point.....Wasn't talking about last season
Originally posted by Triathlon Dude
Next time though try to get one out side of ST
If you would really like I can go back and come up with a number somewhere around 25-30% of them are actually NOT on special Teams...which is sad since he has played 2nd or 3rd SS (out of 3 on the charts) the last few seasons. And he likely gets about 25-30% of his snaps on defense...so it works out about right tbh!
So far this season has only been on ST, which was my point.....Wasn't talking about last season
ryan_grant-25
offline
offline
what a fucking joke
Your issue: http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4673334 has been closed because:
This play is functioning correctly as it was designed. The TE's are meant to be down field blockers here and there is nothing down field. Any changes to the design of plays has to go through as a suggestion and not a bug.
Your issue: http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4673334 has been closed because:
This play is functioning correctly as it was designed. The TE's are meant to be down field blockers here and there is nothing down field. Any changes to the design of plays has to go through as a suggestion and not a bug.
stromstarhammer
offline
offline
Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
what a fucking joke
Your issue: http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4673334 has been closed because:
This play is functioning correctly as it was designed. The TE's are meant to be down field blockers here and there is nothing down field. Any changes to the design of plays has to go through as a suggestion and not a bug.
I didn't pipe in because I didn't want to derail this thread, but I knew that would be the reaction from the bugs mods because that's an issue that has been brought up multiple times over the last 2 years that I've been watching that subforum. Naturally, this is the first one about that particular play, but they always respond that the blockers are following the path that they are designed to run down so they're going through the proper motions. What they refuse to acknowledge is that against some defenses, blockers need to deviate from the designated path and see that if there's NO ONE upfield, they need to choose a new path. Now THAT would be a suggestion.
In fact, I'm gonna copy and paste and see if that works.
what a fucking joke
Your issue: http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4673334 has been closed because:
This play is functioning correctly as it was designed. The TE's are meant to be down field blockers here and there is nothing down field. Any changes to the design of plays has to go through as a suggestion and not a bug.
I didn't pipe in because I didn't want to derail this thread, but I knew that would be the reaction from the bugs mods because that's an issue that has been brought up multiple times over the last 2 years that I've been watching that subforum. Naturally, this is the first one about that particular play, but they always respond that the blockers are following the path that they are designed to run down so they're going through the proper motions. What they refuse to acknowledge is that against some defenses, blockers need to deviate from the designated path and see that if there's NO ONE upfield, they need to choose a new path. Now THAT would be a suggestion.
In fact, I'm gonna copy and paste and see if that works.
TrevJo
offline
offline
It's kind of like how defenders playing a zone will bail out deep if there is no one in their zone.... even if all of the receivers are running shorter routes.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
