Warrior General Games

Originally posted by vladykins
Originally posted by Andreas Illum

Originally posted by ShakeNBake


hate on bitch

Sot he new network that EEA entered is also addicts?

flawed logic is flawed IMO...

The list provided is Addict-owned teams; and we allow teams to be part of other networks and have a number of subfamilies ourselves, so logic is perfectly fine.

logic is flawwed, he was trying to give the addicts credit for all of those teams being in the w/l, Nice try, I didnt ask who had addicts forum access and owns a w/l team, I asked how many "addicts teams" there were

So if I would be an Addict all my teams would become Addict teams as well?

Originally posted by MadCow DTD


I like being drunk on the GLB radio



Who doesn't?

Originally posted by MadCow DTD


logic is flawwed, he was trying to give the addicts credit for all of those teams being in the w/l, Nice try, I didnt ask who had addicts forum access and owns a w/l team, I asked how many "addicts teams" there were

Define Addict team? If a team owned by an Addict is an Addict team, then yes, it's an Addict team. If you are looking for teams 100% owned by, run by, and full of players from Addicts, then you'll have a harder time finding any teams like that.

As noted above and noted before, we are more a network of networks and farms; a loose confederation of sorts. Trying to crack down and be like a traditional network wouldn't work with such a large group. We have sub networks within the Addicts, like Omerta, BSS, LoEA, HOOD, etc. etc. Being their own subfamily doesn't make them any less Addicts.

If you are an Addict owner, you are free to recruit in our forums and we encourage you to post your dots in our forums to share with other Addict teams.

Originally posted by Disastermaster
So if I would be an Addict all my teams would become Addict teams as well?

Those teams would be Addict-owned, yes. They would still be Dodel too. We don't make things an either/or proposition. The Addicts is about sharing a mutual passion for the game and trying to help out other Addicts, rather than trying to funnel to a few teams like a traditional network or farm system.

Given all that, we have a few flagship teams that are specifically Addict (like the Addict Pee Wee Nation and the experimental limited agent teams.

Originally posted by vladykins
Originally posted by MadCow DTD



logic is flawwed, he was trying to give the addicts credit for all of those teams being in the w/l, Nice try, I didnt ask who had addicts forum access and owns a w/l team, I asked how many "addicts teams" there were

Define Addict team? If a team owned by an Addict is an Addict team, then yes, it's an Addict team. If you are looking for teams 100% owned by, run by, and full of players from Addicts, then you'll have a harder time finding any teams like that.

As noted above and noted before, we are more a network of networks and farms; a loose confederation of sorts. Trying to crack down and be like a traditional network wouldn't work with such a large group. We have sub networks within the Addicts, like Omerta, BSS, LoEA, HOOD, etc. etc. Being their own subfamily doesn't make them any less Addicts.

If you are an Addict owner, you are free to recruit in our forums and we encourage you to post your dots in our forums to share with other Addict teams.

Originally posted by Disastermaster

So if I would be an Addict all my teams would become Addict teams as well?

Those teams would be Addict-owned, yes. They would still be Dodel too. We don't make things an either/or proposition. The Addicts is about sharing a mutual passion for the game and trying to help out other Addicts, rather than trying to funnel to a few teams like a traditional network or farm system.

Given all that, we have a few flagship teams that are specifically Addict (like the Addict Pee Wee Nation and the experimental limited agent teams.

bullshit, Just because you have access to the addicts forum, doesnt mean yourteam is an addict team. To me, the only thing that makes a team and addicts team is, Being Addicts Owned, Addicts Run, with a majority Addicts Dots.

Thats what makes every other network team a network team, I just left and big network and joined another, and those teams are Owned and ran by the network with a vast majority of the team being in that said network.,

I just thinks is dump you are trying to take credit for every team because their owner reads your forum, its pretty lol

Originally posted by MadCow DTD


bullshit, Just because you have access to the addicts forum, doesnt mean yourteam is an addict team. To me, the only thing that makes a team and addicts team is, Being Addicts Owned, Addicts Run, with a majority Addicts Dots.

Thats what makes every other network team a network team, I just left and big network and joined another, and those teams are Owned and ran by the network with a vast majority of the team being in that said network.,

I just thinks is dump you are trying to take credit for every team because their owner reads your forum, its pretty lol

Reading comprehension is still not one of Mad Cow's strong points. That's why I him so. I also like the extra edit but still forgot to correct "dumb".

Addicts aren't like other networks. If we were, we'd only have one or two teams up top to feed into. NGTH when you have 600+ members and an assload of teams running around. It's tough enough getting a single team farm system to put their VAs in the right place, let alone trying to manage that same thing with that many agents and teams running around.

The larger networks realize this and know they don't fit the same mold.

Also, you'd be shocked at who all is an Addict. Just because not everyone throws it in their avy doesn't mean they aren't an Addict (or even a proud one). You'd be shocked how many of the teams listed above meet your definition of Addict owned, helmed, and majority played.

I may not have worded it as his royal mooooo'ness did but I kind of agree with with Madcow's saying. You seem to be bragging about addict owned tams in WL as if to show some sort of dominance. When it's pretty clear many of those teams are not addict owned despite your extremely liberal definition of "owned". I really hope you don't use that same sort of rationale when recruiting as it seems very disingenuous.

I have a few players that I know belong to addicts I hope it doesnt mean were now addict owned..lol

I think I can say proudly, I never want to be part of any addict lolnetworklol

Originally posted by vladykins
Originally posted by MadCow DTD



bullshit, Just because you have access to the addicts forum, doesnt mean yourteam is an addict team. To me, the only thing that makes a team and addicts team is, Being Addicts Owned, Addicts Run, with a majority Addicts Dots.

Thats what makes every other network team a network team, I just left and big network and joined another, and those teams are Owned and ran by the network with a vast majority of the team being in that said network.,

I just thinks is dump you are trying to take credit for every team because their owner reads your forum, its pretty lol

Reading comprehension is still not one of Mad Cow's strong points. That's why I him so. I also like the extra edit but still forgot to correct "dumb".

Addicts aren't like other networks. If we were, we'd only have one or two teams up top to feed into. NGTH when you have 600+ members and an assload of teams running around. It's tough enough getting a single team farm system to put their VAs in the right place, let alone trying to manage that same thing with that many agents and teams running around.

The larger networks realize this and know they don't fit the same mold.

Also, you'd be shocked at who all is an Addict. Just because not everyone throws it in their avy doesn't mean they aren't an Addict (or even a proud one). You'd be shocked how many of the teams listed above meet your definition of Addict owned, helmed, and majority played.

then the addicts are not a network, jst a big clusterfuck of people on one private forum,, The addicts are too big to be a sucessful network, which is why they have split off into their own networks, IE HOOD, BSS, Omerta. those are networks, not subs of your network. the addicts are watered down, quanitiy over quality

Originally posted by Mavooo
I may not have worded it as his royal mooooo'ness did but I kind of agree with with Madcow's saying. You seem to be bragging about addict owned tams in WL as if to show some sort of dominance. When it's pretty clear many of those teams are not addict owned despite your extremely liberal definition of "owned". I really hope you don't use that same sort of rationale when recruiting as it seems very disingenuous.

I have a few players that I know belong to addicts I hope it doesnt mean were now addict owned..lol

LOL- bragging is pretty wrong term for it when it is a reaction to "Look- Addicts lose and can't do shit." Plenty of Addicts do, plenty of Addicts don't. It's Mad Cow who loves us enough to follow us wherever we go and wants to bring attention to us. It's usually clear the folks who love the Addicts the most because they can't stop talking about us, including going so far as to join our external forum outside of GLB.

And your team wouldn't be Addict owned unless you were an Addict, regardless of whether you filled your team with Addicts. Not sure why you think someone would use that rationale to recruit *in* the Addicts forum.

Originally posted by MadCow DTD

then the addicts are not a network, jst a big clusterfuck of people on one private forum,, The addicts are too big to be a sucessful network, which is why they have split off into their own networks, IE HOOD, BSS, Omerta. those are networks, not subs of your network. the addicts are watered down, quanitiy over quality

LOL- look, you are catching on that we aren't a network like everyone else. See, you can learn to read!

Also- ask P@nda, jallowe, and lem if they are subfamilies of the Addicts. Check the name of Omerta's top team too. You may learn another lesson in reading.

Originally posted by vladykins
LOL- bragging is pretty wrong term for it when it is a reaction to "Look- Addicts lose and can't do shit." Plenty of Addicts do, plenty of Addicts don't. It's Mad Cow who loves us enough to follow us wherever we go and wants to bring attention to us. It's usually clear the folks who love the Addicts the most because they can't stop talking about us, including going so far as to join our external forum outside of GLB.

And your team wouldn't be Addict owned unless you were an Addict, regardless of whether you filled your team with Addicts. Not sure why you think someone would use that rationale to recruit *in* the Addicts forum.


I was referring to recruiting in the plft forum.

Originally posted by Mavooo


I was referring to recruiting in the plft forum.

Addict owners don't "typically" recruit in the PLFT by saying "Hey, we're an Addict team!" unless they are trying to recruit an Addict. Lords know that Mad Cow might crap his pants if you said that trying to get one of his dots.

Personally I don't run around in the PLFT threads for a team unless one of my recruiters asks me to, and then we usually spend time showing them what our team forums are like by discussing goat sex.

Originally posted by vladykins
Originally posted by MadCow DTD


then the addicts are not a network, jst a big clusterfuck of people on one private forum,, The addicts are too big to be a sucessful network, which is why they have split off into their own networks, IE HOOD, BSS, Omerta. those are networks, not subs of your network. the addicts are watered down, quanitiy over quality

LOL- look, you are catching on that we aren't a network like everyone else. See, you can learn to read!

Also- ask P@nda, jallowe, and lem if they are subfamilies of the Addicts. Check the name of Omerta's top team too. You may learn another lesson in reading.

Yes , but you are trying to say that the addicts have a manhandle on the w/l because of all the team owners who are addicts, ..

and no, the addicts arent a network at all, not at all, just a bunch of scrubs who didnt get picked to be in Omerta, BSS and HOod. just the left overs... addicts are just stupid and this thread proves it

Originally posted by MadCow DTD


Yes , but you are trying to say that the addicts have a manhandle on the w/l because of all the team owners who are addicts, ..

and no, the addicts arent a network at all, not at all, just a bunch of scrubs who didnt get picked to be in Omerta, BSS and HOod. just the left overs... addicts are just stupid and this thread proves it



I guess most of the folks in those subfamilies also being Addicts means that those subfamilies are lead by the scrubs who didn't get picked top be in?

You're trying too hard now. Take a rest and go talk to VDA for awhile to see if you can find anyone else who hates you. I got too much MC