Warrior General Games

Originally posted by GMathiasf
I wouldn't go that far. It means something. It would mean a lot more if we took out Ps/Ks as just a start. And probably include all the dots, not just the top half. Add to that some sort of calculation including AEQ. There is definitely a correlation between higher effective level and success, but it's certainly not absolute.

We're in full swing of the 1000 sp 4 aeq dot

edit: 5 attribute dot (cb/lb/ss/fs/wr/hb)

Originally posted by cavalier
I am very surprised that Alpine is at 4th with 18 dots that are younger than 400 days (meaning 6 more boosts or more). Compared to the top three that has 2, 1 and 4 respectively (Lincoln, Hali, HHWC).



When half the roster isn't included in the effective level calculations, you could put 18 level 1s and still be at the top.

Originally posted by GMathiasf
When half the roster isn't included in the effective level calculations, you could put 18 level 1s and still be at the top.

You could also build a team of just centers and punters.

Originally posted by cavalier
You could also build a team of just centers and punters.


Centers wouldn't help you anymore. QBs-Ps-Ks are where it's at.

Hey guys, im surprised that these dots not included in the calculation aren't lowering our total.

Originally posted by Gart888
Hey guys, im surprised that these dots not included in the calculation aren't lowering our total.

...what?

2 ALL U NUKKAZ WHO BE ACTIN TO0 BOLD

Originally posted by Gart888
Hey guys, im surprised that these dots not included in the calculation aren't lowering our total.

If some of them are at positions that normally *would* be in the calculation - then it's still valid.

If you replace a low EL dot with a low EL dot, it won't affect your "average:. If you simply add a low EL dot, it might affect your "average", depending on whether you had an odd or even number of players. lolGLB

Originally posted by cavalier
You could also build a team of just centers and punters.


How about a team of just Hilliards.

EL taught me how to dougie

EL?

Notice Cincy and Dallas, the 1 and 2 from last seasons POs, are p damn low on the list.

Originally posted by Moondog22
Notice Cincy and Dallas, the 1 and 2 from last seasons POs, are p damn low on the list.

That's proof of the reverse correlation between EL and success.

Originally posted by ddingo
Originally posted by Moondog22

Notice Cincy and Dallas, the 1 and 2 from last seasons POs, are p damn low on the list.

That's proof of the reverse correlation between EL and success.

sarcasm meter at full power gentlemen

still goes to show that it isnt all EL.

Of coruse you have Canton, Lincoln etc at the top of the list...