Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jdbolick
Yeah, but he wasn't going to hit a very high mark even if he had made it to plateau (the 106 included equipment). Greedy was created a season later and crushed that. Flames just made a mark in the forum, his actual builds weren't revolutionary.

I sware he was up to 120

Wasn't.

Originally posted by Homage


XDee is the man though... .

Best DC is the game right now

Originally posted by bhall43
Not sure id call any of these guys revolutionary...but alright.

Revolutionary would be a dude with 100 stamina and 100 jumping that just bounced over every would be tackler, to the endzone.

Originally posted by jdbolick
No slight on Perv, but no one ever has or ever will come close to Sacker Backer as best blitzing LB in GLB. Buxx built two of the most revolutionary players the game has ever seen.

There's nothing revolutionary about putting speed into a blitzing LB... unless you're trying to argue the extent?
Because BUXX surely didn't come up with the building methods to create such massively high numbers on certain attributes.

Patterson is a much better blitzing LB career-wise than Sacker Backer was and to me it's not even close...
WL before plateau and after is way more impressive. And I'm sure RyanCane would tell you... he didn't do anything revolutionary.
Just allocated the points where they needed to go and went to a place that utilized his strengths.

Originally posted by jamz
Revolutionary would be a dude with 100 stamina and 100 jumping that just bounced over every would be tackler, to the endzone.

Revolutionary would be De Hansa. The Ice Skating Kick returner.

Originally posted by bhall43
Revolutionary would be De Hansa. The Ice Skating Kick returner.

No, that's just broken vas.

Really there is nothing revolutionary about a broken line bug that allows the most pussy ass LB ever to come at the QB untouched over and over and over again. Taking speed to its highest points isn't a revolutionary part of GLB...its been an ongoing thing since season 1.

Originally posted by jamz
No, that's just broken vas.

shhh

Originally posted by bhall43
Really there is nothing revolutionary about a broken line bug that allows the most pussy ass LB ever to come at the QB untouched over and over and over again. Taking speed to its highest points isn't a revolutionary part of GLB...its been an ongoing thing since season 1.

DCs have no ability to generate creative looks up front to confuse the O line. stunts or loop blitz .. delayed blitz .. give us something and we'll stop pushing the gap shooting.

the inside blitz did take a hit this sim, ill say that.

Buxx's dots were revolutionary because they came before it was the cool thing to do. There were no other dots like Sacker Backer at the time even if there are 100s built better than him now. Mark Clark and Speedy Greedy were border line because they weren't so alone, but they were both special dots on a very unique team.

Originally posted by evileyez
DCs have no ability to generate creative looks up front to confuse the O line. stunts or loop blitz .. delayed blitz .. give us something and we'll stop pushing the gap shooting.

the inside blitz did take a hit this sim, ill say that.

im certainly not knocking DC's for doing it....just saying thats not some revolutionary player aspect when its been the prime part of the game since pretty much the beginning part of AI and once the DPC was created it was just a broken part of the game all together.

Originally posted by GMathiasf
Buxx's dots were revolutionary because they came before it was the cool thing to do. There were no other dots like Sacker Backer at the time even if there are 100s built better than him now. Mark Clark and Speedy Greedy were border line because they weren't so alone, but they were both special dots on a very unique team.
I didn't list Clark because all-speed WRs weren't unique (MoMac, etc), but Speedy was above and beyond any HB until the new archetypes. Even Hulk Blazing was way, way short in both pure speed and receiving totals. Meanwhile Sacker Backer took balls because speed was a minor on LBs. I started out pushing speed on my guy Tailor but pussed out after a couple of seasons.


Originally posted by Homage
There's nothing revolutionary about putting speed into a blitzing LB
Yes, it actually was. See above.

Originally posted by
Patterson is a much better blitzing LB career-wise than Sacker Backer was and to me it's not even close...
You're wrong.

Originally posted by
WL before plateau and after is way more impressive.
Not really.

I think people forget how recent the speedy, blitzing ROLB phenomenon is.