Originally posted by Ruger7mmmag
We've played with 45 plenty of times and done very well even with the stamina being a part of it. We just always carried only one QB, had one of our CBs or WRs built as a hybrid and didn't have "extra fat" at LB, CB and WR. If stamina isn't an issue, it can easily be done.
QB-1
RB-power, scat
FB-no need for two as the power RB can be used for FB run plays.
OT-4
G-4
C-2 (could get away with one and have one of the other guys slide in behind him depending on builds)
WR-5
TE-2
That's 21
DT-4
DE-4
LB-6
CB-5
FS-1
SS-1
That's 21
P
K
Return Specialist
There's your 45...remember, stamina isn't an issue...
Like I said, we had some great seasons using this formula when stamina did matter. we just recruited specifically and were creative in our depth chart.
Got a couple of games into the playoffs with 45 here. But they were at their prime then.
We've played with 45 plenty of times and done very well even with the stamina being a part of it. We just always carried only one QB, had one of our CBs or WRs built as a hybrid and didn't have "extra fat" at LB, CB and WR. If stamina isn't an issue, it can easily be done.
QB-1
RB-power, scat
FB-no need for two as the power RB can be used for FB run plays.
OT-4
G-4
C-2 (could get away with one and have one of the other guys slide in behind him depending on builds)
WR-5
TE-2
That's 21
DT-4
DE-4
LB-6
CB-5
FS-1
SS-1
That's 21
P
K
Return Specialist
There's your 45...remember, stamina isn't an issue...
Like I said, we had some great seasons using this formula when stamina did matter. we just recruited specifically and were creative in our depth chart.
Got a couple of games into the playoffs with 45 here. But they were at their prime then.





Just when zeta looked like they might be closing the gap























