Originally posted by DanceTheSpears
Originally posted by Novus
They're claiming sovreignty under the 10th amendment.
The 10th amendment is easily the most-ignored Constitutional amendment today, even more than the 1st and 2nd. What it says is that any powers that the Constitution doesn't specifically grant to the federal government should instead be granted to either the state governments or the people.
To put it in layman's terms... "Hey, Feds! See this piece of paper? It's called the Constitution. If this piece of paper doesn't SPECIFICALLY say you're allowed to do something, you're not allowed to do it. So bite me!"
And thus ends my participation in this thread. Internet arguments over politics never end well. I just wanted to frame the beginning of the debate in the hopes that page 1 and perhaps page 2 will actually contain interesting and compelling debate before the flame-war opens on page 3.
I have a feeling that the Commerce Clause and the "Necessary and Proper" clause take care of your objections.
I have a feeling that Big Government politicians have used those clauses to take sovreignity away from the states for so long that most people in this country have no clue it's wrong.
See what comes from letting the government teach our kids about government...?
Originally posted by Novus
They're claiming sovreignty under the 10th amendment.
The 10th amendment is easily the most-ignored Constitutional amendment today, even more than the 1st and 2nd. What it says is that any powers that the Constitution doesn't specifically grant to the federal government should instead be granted to either the state governments or the people.
To put it in layman's terms... "Hey, Feds! See this piece of paper? It's called the Constitution. If this piece of paper doesn't SPECIFICALLY say you're allowed to do something, you're not allowed to do it. So bite me!"
And thus ends my participation in this thread. Internet arguments over politics never end well. I just wanted to frame the beginning of the debate in the hopes that page 1 and perhaps page 2 will actually contain interesting and compelling debate before the flame-war opens on page 3.

I have a feeling that the Commerce Clause and the "Necessary and Proper" clause take care of your objections.
I have a feeling that Big Government politicians have used those clauses to take sovreignity away from the states for so long that most people in this country have no clue it's wrong.
See what comes from letting the government teach our kids about government...?





























