Warrior General Games

Why the limitation on positions, that's part of the fun of ironman in my mind, if someone wants to build a team of 10 FBs and 10 DEs why not let them?

Well do you think I should take them off? The whole purpose was so that no one could really exploit anything.

Lets see what everyone else thinks. I'm willing to go along either way.

I figure if a team wants to build a super-powered offense and no defense that is a strategy not an exploit. It would be interesting to see two super-powered offenses go head to head, and two super-powered defenses might be low scoring but it has it's own intrigue. In the end a balanced team like you outlined might be the most powerful. I think that's the fun of this whole ironman idea.

I guess if someone created a team of 20 HBs because they have money to throw away it might be considered an exploit. The same if someone created a team of 20 Cs and boosted them all for 6k flex total.

But we're in peewees we're already used to paying extra to play the same game as everyone else right?

Yeah I guess. I'd put leave them on for this season and see how it goes.


Everyone involved, I'll be sending out a PM to which league to buy in, that way it's private and not another one of these idiot GLB guys buys one.

Originally posted by climberpete
Why the limitation on positions, that's part of the fun of ironman in my mind, if someone wants to build a team of 10 FBs and 10 DEs why not let them?

Agree! A lot of people talk about exploit. As far as I can tell it would be strategy. We all have the same rules. Bort is known to change shit up in mid-season... but what the hell. I say we should all think outside the box and the best strategy should win!

Originally posted by enasty19
Yeah I guess. I'd put leave them on for this season and see how it goes.


Everyone involved, I'll be sending out a PM to which league to buy in, that way it's private and not another one of these idiot GLB guys buys one.

I already have my three Pee Wee teams. So I can't get in that way.
If I sale, I have to wait 21 days to buy another

SUGGESTION:

how about we all send support a request ticket to have our teams all shuffled to the same league and division

I thought we could have two pee wee teams this season

Originally posted by Lone Star Mercs
I thought we could have two pee wee teams this season

you can have:
3 regular
3 casual
3 pee wee

I would be interested in throwing one of my peewee teams in. They are already in leagues though.

Originally posted by climberpete
I guess if someone created a team of 20 HBs because they have money to throw away it might be considered an exploit. The same if someone created a team of 20 Cs and boosted them all for 6k flex total.

But we're in peewees we're already used to paying extra to play the same game as everyone else right?

how is this an exploit? A team of 20 HBs would suck, no matter how much it costs

Don't limit the positions.

Originally posted by haole

how is this an exploit? A team of 20 HBs would suck, no matter how much it costs

Don't limit the positions.

If a team of all HBs worked better than a balanced team everyone would be doing it already.

So should I remove the limits? I suppose there aren't too many exploits.



And if we get 16 teams, I'll try to buy out a conference. Then for play-offs, we'll be doing scrimmages most likely.

I like the idea of limits for an even playing field and competitive games. I like no limits because it allows more strategy as far as setting a team up and could give ideas for the future of Ironman.

Admin would have to let my team move to a different conference most likely.