It's not like the CB's were intercepting balls right on top of the WR, almost every single one was a deep throw that was under-thrown.
Forum > Pro Leagues > At what point will Chemistry be too overpowered?
Until we get an actual log of moral per player, per play, we'll never know what affects what and to what extent.
Guru44
offline
offline
Originally posted by arteryman
It's not like the CB's were intercepting balls right on top of the WR, almost every single one was a deep throw that was under-thrown.
That's called "jumping the route" not "under-thrown"
examples - all the same CB
1 - "jump the route" INT 3rd play of game so morale discussion is out the window
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1263664&pbp_id=4683005
2 - "jump the route" gets beat, go balls out or go home pussies
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1263664&pbp_id=4686382
or
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1263664&pbp_id=4691693
It's not like the CB's were intercepting balls right on top of the WR, almost every single one was a deep throw that was under-thrown.
That's called "jumping the route" not "under-thrown"
examples - all the same CB
1 - "jump the route" INT 3rd play of game so morale discussion is out the window
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1263664&pbp_id=4683005
2 - "jump the route" gets beat, go balls out or go home pussies
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1263664&pbp_id=4686382
or
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1263664&pbp_id=4691693
Guru44
offline
offline
It's funny seeing everyone guess and be so way off base....I like it 
You guys are lucky Danger got to old this season tbh. He's been the backbone of the secondary for many seasons
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=778916

You guys are lucky Danger got to old this season tbh. He's been the backbone of the secondary for many seasons
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=778916
Chemistry's effects are significant, but not to the point where you could blame 11 INTs on it. Bort's quantified chemistry's effects in the past. I'll copy/paste my post over from Cryptotich's chemistry thread.
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
First you need to calculate a specific player's chemistry score. This is done by averaging overall chemistry and which ever side of the ball is relevant to him. So an HB for example you'd average the overall chemistry and offensive chemistry. That number gives you your chemistry score.
From there, the penalty that is assigned is 1% for every 10 points. It's a hit to your attributes (all).
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
First you need to calculate a specific player's chemistry score. This is done by averaging overall chemistry and which ever side of the ball is relevant to him. So an HB for example you'd average the overall chemistry and offensive chemistry. That number gives you your chemistry score.
From there, the penalty that is assigned is 1% for every 10 points. It's a hit to your attributes (all).
jdros13
offline
offline
While I appreciate it, you guys are giving BDC too much respect in this thread.
I don't think we're 100 points worse than Gunny, but I expected them to win this game and I'm not shocked they got a lot of ints. Obviously 11 was a bit much, but they have good builds and a good scheme that has worked against lots of teams so far this season.
The result was extreme and their chemistry obviously doesn't hurt, but I certainly don't think it is making that much of a difference.
I don't think we're 100 points worse than Gunny, but I expected them to win this game and I'm not shocked they got a lot of ints. Obviously 11 was a bit much, but they have good builds and a good scheme that has worked against lots of teams so far this season.
The result was extreme and their chemistry obviously doesn't hurt, but I certainly don't think it is making that much of a difference.
jdros13
offline
offline
Originally posted by kurieg
Maybe heavy bullet isn't the best way to throw deep.
I honestly have no idea what our QB's settings are right now. Should probably ask him tbh and then tell him to do something else
Maybe heavy bullet isn't the best way to throw deep.
I honestly have no idea what our QB's settings are right now. Should probably ask him tbh and then tell him to do something else

kurieg
offline
offline
I managed to shift where my QB threw pick 6's too with a shift of settings. Progress imo
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
Chemistry's effects are significant, but not to the point where you could blame 11 INTs on it. Bort's quantified chemistry's effects in the past. I'll copy/paste my post over from Cryptotich's chemistry thread.
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
First you need to calculate a specific player's chemistry score. This is done by averaging overall chemistry and which ever side of the ball is relevant to him. So an HB for example you'd average the overall chemistry and offensive chemistry. That number gives you your chemistry score.
From there, the penalty that is assigned is 1% for every 10 points. It's a hit to your attributes (all).
I dunno Matt, i mean, I would chalk up 11 INT's to a great defensive scheme, and the secondary to pull it off.
But at the same time, you gotta wonder what effect the QB is feeling on every drive. We know the HB and WR's are taking hits on every single play. Would have to assume the QB is as well.
But again, seeing the endgame morale really doesn't tell us much except what happened on the hanfdull of plays in the last couple minutes.
So, I suppose we'll never really know.
Chemistry's effects are significant, but not to the point where you could blame 11 INTs on it. Bort's quantified chemistry's effects in the past. I'll copy/paste my post over from Cryptotich's chemistry thread.
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
First you need to calculate a specific player's chemistry score. This is done by averaging overall chemistry and which ever side of the ball is relevant to him. So an HB for example you'd average the overall chemistry and offensive chemistry. That number gives you your chemistry score.
From there, the penalty that is assigned is 1% for every 10 points. It's a hit to your attributes (all).
I dunno Matt, i mean, I would chalk up 11 INT's to a great defensive scheme, and the secondary to pull it off.
But at the same time, you gotta wonder what effect the QB is feeling on every drive. We know the HB and WR's are taking hits on every single play. Would have to assume the QB is as well.
But again, seeing the endgame morale really doesn't tell us much except what happened on the hanfdull of plays in the last couple minutes.
So, I suppose we'll never really know.
jrockk33
offline
offline
What happens to a QB's morale after an INT? it goes down right??
When that INt gets taken to the rack that puts the QB right back out there.
Couple that with the fact that they are losing and the Ai is probablty set to throw more often , it isn't that hard to see why it could land slide like it does.
When that INt gets taken to the rack that puts the QB right back out there.
Couple that with the fact that they are losing and the Ai is probablty set to throw more often , it isn't that hard to see why it could land slide like it does.
ImTheScientist
offline
offline
Originally posted by jrockk33
What happens to a QB's morale after an INT? it goes down right??
When that INt gets taken to the rack that puts the QB right back out there.
Couple that with the fact that they are losing and the Ai is probablty set to throw more often , it isn't that hard to see why it could land slide like it does.
Hi old friend.
What happens to a QB's morale after an INT? it goes down right??
When that INt gets taken to the rack that puts the QB right back out there.
Couple that with the fact that they are losing and the Ai is probablty set to throw more often , it isn't that hard to see why it could land slide like it does.
Hi old friend.
ImTheScientist
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdros13
While I appreciate it, you guys are giving BDC too much respect in this thread.
I don't think we're 100 points worse than Gunny, but I expected them to win this game and I'm not shocked they got a lot of ints. Obviously 11 was a bit much, but they have good builds and a good scheme that has worked against lots of teams so far this season.
The result was extreme and their chemistry obviously doesn't hurt, but I certainly don't think it is making that much of a difference.
Thats nice, but the score doesn't agree with you. I watched the game and (although I wasn't sure about Gunnys gameplanning) they took it to you.....and thats why they won by 100+. Better gameplan and better builds.
While I appreciate it, you guys are giving BDC too much respect in this thread.
I don't think we're 100 points worse than Gunny, but I expected them to win this game and I'm not shocked they got a lot of ints. Obviously 11 was a bit much, but they have good builds and a good scheme that has worked against lots of teams so far this season.
The result was extreme and their chemistry obviously doesn't hurt, but I certainly don't think it is making that much of a difference.
Thats nice, but the score doesn't agree with you. I watched the game and (although I wasn't sure about Gunnys gameplanning) they took it to you.....and thats why they won by 100+. Better gameplan and better builds.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.




























