User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pee Wee Leagues > Keep Coaches Out of Pee Wee
Page:
 
gangles
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PING72
i agree...no coaches!

Although, I'd prefer no coaches at any level.

I love how b/c a few of the original owners want a new way to continue to dominate the 95% of GM's that have come along after them the rest of us get screwed.


 
chitchc2
offline
Link
 
I'm good with coaches as an addition, however, I do not believe you should only be able to make a coach with a retired player. It should simply be another position and it really only needs to be 3-5 slots not 10.

IMO
 
enasty19
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by chitchc2
I'm good with coaches as an addition, however, I do not believe you should only be able to make a coach with a retired player. It should simply be another position and it really only needs to be 3-5 slots not 10.

IMO


I somewhat agree, although still, the rich get richer here applies. I only agree on the limited part.
 
Draxius
offline
Link
 
if it was simply another position and only something like 3-5 per team I could tolerate it. otherwise I am 100% against this coaches idea.
 
jsid
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by onemiln09
No to pee wee coaches.


+1
 
D~Town
offline
Link
 
The coach must build a player on the team he represents. Offensive or Defensive player according to coaching abilities. If the coach has no ties to the team with his own flex, to make a player he is worthless. Put your flex where your mouth is.

________________________
Wambulance Academy EMT's
Edited by Dtownokie on Sep 8, 2009 16:43:51
 
bobweave
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jsidrys
Originally posted by onemiln09
No to pee wee coaches.
+1


Edited by bobweave on Sep 7, 2009 23:30:05
Edited by bobweave on Sep 7, 2009 23:29:32
 
Donk3yMan
spaghetti
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bobweave
Originally posted by jsidrys

Originally posted by onemiln09

No to pee wee coaches.
+1




 
Link
 
Originally posted by jsidrys
+1


+1
 
PING72
offline
Link
 
If you're interested, PM Larry Roadgrader for an invite to the private forum against coaches.

Sign the petition.

And steal the avatar I'm using...
 
Time Trial
offline
Link
 
Go vote on the main admin postings.

I've actually chosen "Yes, as long as coaches can also be created earlier than 440 days old, and let's take another season to compile more suggestions."

I'd like to see an implementation plan that is complete instead of just "throwing this idea out there" and I'd like it to be open to more than just Season 1 players if it is going to happen.
 
D~Town
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dtownokie
The coach must build a player on the team he represents. Offensive or Defensive player according to coaching abilities. If the coach has no ties to the team with his own flex, to make a player he is worthless. Put your flex where your mouth is.

________________________
Wambulance Academy EMT's




________________________
Wambulance Academy EMT's
 
D~Town
offline
Link
 
As of 6PM CST 9/8/09

Do you like the idea of coaches?

No, I don't like the idea of coaches at all, in any form
293

Yes, get 'er done!
179

Yes, but let's take another season to test and compile more suggestions
168

Yes, as long as coaches can also be created earlier than 440 days old, and let's take another season to compile more suggestions
116

Yes, as long as coaches can also be created earlier than 440 days old
103

________________________
Wambulance Academy EMT's
Edited by Dtownokie on Sep 8, 2009 17:28:45
 
enasty19
offline
Link
 
Update:
No, I don't like the idea of coaches at all, in any form
574

Yes, but let's take another season to test and compile more suggestion
424

Yes, get 'er done!
403
 
OH-IO ~Cult~
offline
Link
 
Vote no to coaches or I will find you.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.