Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Iceman16
You're not alone.

Then again I usually win when I actually gp

LOL

hey iceman did you game plan against the Harajuku Girls

Originally posted by cowtesticles2001
hey iceman did you game plan against the Harajuku Girls

The only game I've GPed for all season is the one that we won by a point.

Lol that game's in a half hour?

But I'm gonna tweak stuff for the next game. We're playing someone pretty good iirc.

EDIT: nvm it's the game on Wednesday.

Originally posted by Iceman16
The only game I've GPed for all season is the one that we won by a point.

well you tell the truth then...about not losing when you game plan...good work

Originally posted by Iceman16
Originally posted by jrry32

I learn from my mistakes...I also get very pissed off when I GP hard and lose.

You're not alone.

Then again I usually win when I actually gp

I almost always do...including 2 wins over MEM in USA Pro.(1 one in the playoffs...only West team to do that) But frick Zones, I don't have much experience against them. When I get more experience, I ought to do very well. The problem with GLB is that the things that should work and that work IRL, don't work. So you need experience knowing what will work.

So you scouted them hard, but neglected to look at what worked and what didn't against them?

Originally posted by Gart888
So you scouted them hard, but neglected to look at what worked and what didn't against them?

Because teams have had so much success passing against them without the screen that I had a lot to go off of...

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by Gart888

So you scouted them hard, but neglected to look at what worked and what didn't against them?

Because teams have had so much success passing against them without the screen that I had a lot to go off of...

So you noticed teams weren't having success passing against them without the screen, but then you... tried it anyway? Scout better imo.

Originally posted by Gart888
Originally posted by jrry32

Originally posted by Gart888


So you scouted them hard, but neglected to look at what worked and what didn't against them?

Because teams have had so much success passing against them without the screen that I had a lot to go off of...

So you noticed teams weren't having success passing against them without the screen, but then you... tried it anyway? Scout better imo.

Maybe you should have sent him your scouting report on their D....Nah, that wouldn't have been of much use.

I can beat Bonn...don't even need a team.

Originally posted by coachviking
Originally posted by Gart888

Originally posted by jrry32


Originally posted by Gart888



So you scouted them hard, but neglected to look at what worked and what didn't against them?

Because teams have had so much success passing against them without the screen that I had a lot to go off of...

So you noticed teams weren't having success passing against them without the screen, but then you... tried it anyway? Scout better imo.

Maybe you should have sent him your scouting report on their D....Nah, that wouldn't have been of much use.

Sick burn bro.

But yeah, i didn't touch my offense and it put up 418 yards. Jrry supposedly gameplanned really hard and put up 294.

Wasn't questioning the outcome though, was questioning what he did when scouting them if he wasn't looking at what worked and what didn't work against them. Or rather did notice what worked/didn't work, but then decided to go with what didn't work anyway?

Nerf screens IMO. Also, iPhone autochanges nerf to beef.

Originally posted by Gart888
Originally posted by coachviking

Originally posted by Gart888


Originally posted by jrry32



Originally posted by Gart888




So you scouted them hard, but neglected to look at what worked and what didn't against them?

Because teams have had so much success passing against them without the screen that I had a lot to go off of...

So you noticed teams weren't having success passing against them without the screen, but then you... tried it anyway? Scout better imo.

Maybe you should have sent him your scouting report on their D....Nah, that wouldn't have been of much use.

Sick burn bro.

But yeah, i didn't touch my offense and it put up 418 yards. Jrry supposedly gameplanned really hard and put up 294.

Wasn't questioning the outcome though, was questioning what he did when scouting them if he wasn't looking at what worked and what didn't work against them. Or rather did notice what worked/didn't work, but then decided to go with what didn't work anyway?

Here's the problem Gart, MEM's screen offense isn't very effective, we don't have a Dooley or Megan Raine, we couldn't have screened it vs. them. I tried to pass in hopes we could get a few big plays, it didn't work, oh well, this wasn't the playoffs.

Originally posted by Gart888
Originally posted by coachviking

Originally posted by Gart888


Originally posted by jrry32



Originally posted by Gart888




So you scouted them hard, but neglected to look at what worked and what didn't against them?

Because teams have had so much success passing against them without the screen that I had a lot to go off of...

So you noticed teams weren't having success passing against them without the screen, but then you... tried it anyway? Scout better imo.

Maybe you should have sent him your scouting report on their D....Nah, that wouldn't have been of much use.

Sick burn bro.

But yeah, i didn't touch my offense and it put up 418 yards. Jrry supposedly gameplanned really hard and put up 294.

Wasn't questioning the outcome though, was questioning what he did when scouting them if he wasn't looking at what worked and what didn't work against them. Or rather did notice what worked/didn't work, but then decided to go with what didn't work anyway?

Not trying for the burn bro...just pointing out the No one has done crap against them. It is what is. Someone will figure it out and everyone will jump on the band wagon, than something will get nerfed and all hell will break loose. Just another GLB season IMO