Actually cutting the roster size down to anything below 55 is a pretty immaterial concern. It doesnt need to be done and there is no reason for it.
Capaneus
offline
offline
Honestly, TSE, I have no idea why a 55 man roster is so much more terrible than a 40 man one. You'll have to spell it out for me: how does having a 55 man roster cap negatively impact the game?
kadafitcd
offline
offline
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
And yeah I have thought about that, and there are all kinds of answers for where those players would go, you could come up with all kinds of solutions for solving the mystery of where do the players go.
TSE Your vague answers to everyone questioning you pretty much proves that you have no clue wtf you are talking about. Just STFU and quit the game you fag. Mr. High Morals that basically robbed the game early to make a bunch of cash.
And yeah I have thought about that, and there are all kinds of answers for where those players would go, you could come up with all kinds of solutions for solving the mystery of where do the players go.
TSE Your vague answers to everyone questioning you pretty much proves that you have no clue wtf you are talking about. Just STFU and quit the game you fag. Mr. High Morals that basically robbed the game early to make a bunch of cash.
Painmaker
offline
offline
Originally posted by chronoaug
There were some good GLB teams even in usapl last season running in the 40s as far as player totals go .Get over yourself.
TBH we added around 7 players once the 55 man cap went into effect, as I'm sure a lot of teams did. Very few teams carried 50 or more players before the cap.
ldo
There were some good GLB teams even in usapl last season running in the 40s as far as player totals go .Get over yourself.
TBH we added around 7 players once the 55 man cap went into effect, as I'm sure a lot of teams did. Very few teams carried 50 or more players before the cap.
ldo
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Originally posted by chronoaug
Claiming you stopped trying as soon as your teams started to fall off a bit is the oldest loser trick in the book.
I didn't stop trying. Who said I stopped trying?
An older trick in the book is actually to misrepresent other people and then bash them based upon that misrepresentation.
Claiming you stopped trying as soon as your teams started to fall off a bit is the oldest loser trick in the book.
I didn't stop trying. Who said I stopped trying?
An older trick in the book is actually to misrepresent other people and then bash them based upon that misrepresentation.
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Originally posted by Capaneus
Honestly, TSE, I have no idea why a 55 man roster is so much more terrible than a 40 man one. You'll have to spell it out for me: how does having a 55 man roster cap negatively impact the game?
What's the point in debating a roster limit? I'm not interested in debating the roster limit, that ship had sailed a long time ago, and Bort made his decision, it's a moot point now.
Honestly, TSE, I have no idea why a 55 man roster is so much more terrible than a 40 man one. You'll have to spell it out for me: how does having a 55 man roster cap negatively impact the game?
What's the point in debating a roster limit? I'm not interested in debating the roster limit, that ship had sailed a long time ago, and Bort made his decision, it's a moot point now.
Galkuris
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dirtmcgirt66
* Have 3 wins but all against some of the USA Pro's worst teams. Need to turn it up or they may be asking to move to SEAPL after this season.
I love this comment in the WSI portion.
I'll take credit for that one
. (and then Karma bites me in the butt and we lost to SEAPL)
* Have 3 wins but all against some of the USA Pro's worst teams. Need to turn it up or they may be asking to move to SEAPL after this season.
I love this comment in the WSI portion.
I'll take credit for that one
. (and then Karma bites me in the butt and we lost to SEAPL)Edited by Galkuris on Jul 3, 2009 12:22:59
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Originally posted by kadafitcd
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
And yeah I have thought about that, and there are all kinds of answers for where those players would go, you could come up with all kinds of solutions for solving the mystery of where do the players go.
TSE Your vague answers to everyone questioning you pretty much proves that you have no clue wtf you are talking about. Just STFU and quit the game you fag. Mr. High Morals that basically robbed the game early to make a bunch of cash.
No thanks, I think I will stay. Just out of curiosity, which one offends you the most, the fact that I made over $1,000 to play this game while you had to pay out money, or the possibility that I might like to suck cock? Are you really that afraid of gay people?
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
And yeah I have thought about that, and there are all kinds of answers for where those players would go, you could come up with all kinds of solutions for solving the mystery of where do the players go.
TSE Your vague answers to everyone questioning you pretty much proves that you have no clue wtf you are talking about. Just STFU and quit the game you fag. Mr. High Morals that basically robbed the game early to make a bunch of cash.
No thanks, I think I will stay. Just out of curiosity, which one offends you the most, the fact that I made over $1,000 to play this game while you had to pay out money, or the possibility that I might like to suck cock? Are you really that afraid of gay people?
coachviking
offline
offline
It is sure nice to see TSE back and in fine form. I for one am shocked that he is making excuses for the level of suck that DDL has reached. We all know the real problem, the game got more complex and we found out who wasn't an expert at strategy.
By the way I think it's also rather funny that the SIM is the best that it has ever been and he is bitching about it being bad......
By the way I think it's also rather funny that the SIM is the best that it has ever been and he is bitching about it being bad......
coachviking
offline
offline
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by kadafitcd
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
And yeah I have thought about that, and there are all kinds of answers for where those players would go, you could come up with all kinds of solutions for solving the mystery of where do the players go.
TSE Your vague answers to everyone questioning you pretty much proves that you have no clue wtf you are talking about. Just STFU and quit the game you fag. Mr. High Morals that basically robbed the game early to make a bunch of cash.
No thanks, I think I will stay. Just out of curiosity, which one offends you the most, the fact that I made over $1,000 to play this game while you had to pay out money, or the possibility that I might like to suck cock? Are you really that afraid of gay people?
You sir didn't make a dime playing the game, you made money (I doubt it was a grand) by scamming ignorant Noobs.
Originally posted by kadafitcd
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
And yeah I have thought about that, and there are all kinds of answers for where those players would go, you could come up with all kinds of solutions for solving the mystery of where do the players go.
TSE Your vague answers to everyone questioning you pretty much proves that you have no clue wtf you are talking about. Just STFU and quit the game you fag. Mr. High Morals that basically robbed the game early to make a bunch of cash.
No thanks, I think I will stay. Just out of curiosity, which one offends you the most, the fact that I made over $1,000 to play this game while you had to pay out money, or the possibility that I might like to suck cock? Are you really that afraid of gay people?
You sir didn't make a dime playing the game, you made money (I doubt it was a grand) by scamming ignorant Noobs.
Capaneus
offline
offline
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by Capaneus
Honestly, TSE, I have no idea why a 55 man roster is so much more terrible than a 40 man one. You'll have to spell it out for me: how does having a 55 man roster cap negatively impact the game?
What's the point in debating a roster limit? I'm not interested in debating the roster limit, that ship had sailed a long time ago, and Bort made his decision, it's a moot point now.
You don't get it: I honestly don't understand. Why is a 40 man roster far superior to a 55? I don't even know what your argument is I wasn't here for that, apparently.
Originally posted by Capaneus
Honestly, TSE, I have no idea why a 55 man roster is so much more terrible than a 40 man one. You'll have to spell it out for me: how does having a 55 man roster cap negatively impact the game?
What's the point in debating a roster limit? I'm not interested in debating the roster limit, that ship had sailed a long time ago, and Bort made his decision, it's a moot point now.
You don't get it: I honestly don't understand. Why is a 40 man roster far superior to a 55? I don't even know what your argument is I wasn't here for that, apparently.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
