User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Link
 
Manila > Pa Dong. There. I said it.
 
SCACE
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by papaschnay2
Originally posted by bhall43

lolgaruda...


This is the truth....haha


 
MD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ShotPutNC


I know it is your first year in Pro but take it from the best competitor in Garuda, LSP. They dont talk shit (unless provoked). They dont care what naga guys say. You saying that Garuda wins doesnt mean anything. LSP always has a shot at taking the Super Wok, and we all know they are capable. With the way they beat the Garudas they are far above most of Garuda as well. Maybe you should focus on beating them before you look at who would stack up with naga.


First year in SEAPL, not in Pro though. I know how Pro leagues work.

As for whos better, Naga just keeps on saying they are better overall based on the past. Im saying right now and for the season, Garuda is/will be the better conference overall.

BKK plays LSP tomorow. We know they are tough, we'll see how things go.
 
g-bay-be
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MD
Originally posted by ShotPutNC



I know it is your first year in Pro but take it from the best competitor in Garuda, LSP. They dont talk shit (unless provoked). They dont care what naga guys say. You saying that Garuda wins doesnt mean anything. LSP always has a shot at taking the Super Wok, and we all know they are capable. With the way they beat the Garudas they are far above most of Garuda as well. Maybe you should focus on beating them before you look at who would stack up with naga.


First year in SEAPL, not in Pro though. I know how Pro leagues work.

As for whos better, Naga just keeps on saying they are better overall based on the past. Im saying right now and for the season, Garuda is/will be the better conference overall.

BKK plays LSP tomorow. We know they are tough, we'll see how things go.



you'll lose by 70+
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ShotPutNC


I know it is your first year in Pro but take it from the best competitor in Garuda, LSP. They dont talk shit (unless provoked). They dont care what naga guys say. You saying that Garuda wins doesnt mean anything. LSP always has a shot at taking the Super Wok, and we all know they are capable. With the way they beat the Garudas they are far above most of Garuda as well. Maybe you should focus on beating them before you look at who would stack up with naga.


LSP has a tough enough time trying to stay awake in the playoffs to even get to the championship game..
 
MD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by g-bay-be



you'll lose by 70+


Lol, fuck off 70+.

 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MD
Originally posted by ShotPutNC



I know it is your first year in Pro but take it from the best competitor in Garuda, LSP. They dont talk shit (unless provoked). They dont care what naga guys say. You saying that Garuda wins doesnt mean anything. LSP always has a shot at taking the Super Wok, and we all know they are capable. With the way they beat the Garudas they are far above most of Garuda as well. Maybe you should focus on beating them before you look at who would stack up with naga.


First year in SEAPL, not in Pro though. I know how Pro leagues work.

As for whos better, Naga just keeps on saying they are better overall based on the past. Im saying right now and for the season, Garuda is/will be the better conference overall.

BKK plays LSP tomorow. We know they are tough, we'll see how things go.


Garuda will never be better when you don't have 3 teams that can take down ESL, Bandar, Singapore at least 5 out of 10 games.
 
ShotPutNC
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MD
Originally posted by g-bay-be




you'll lose by 70+


Lol, fuck off 70+.



It wont be close...
 
MD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43


Garuda will never be better when you don't have 3 teams that can take down ESL, Bandar, Singapore at least 5 out of 10 games.


Speculation FTW.....
 
g-bay-be
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MD
Originally posted by g-bay-be




you'll lose by 70+


Lol, fuck off 70+.



let me put it this way. you'll lose by more than what BLPP will beat winona warriors. and we plan on winning by at least 50. we actually plan on throwing the ball
Edited by g-bay-be on Jun 22, 2009 15:42:16
 
MD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ShotPutNC
Originally posted by MD

Originally posted by g-bay-be





you'll lose by 70+


Lol, fuck off 70+.



It wont be close...


You said 70+, care to wager on that?
 
PFDS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by g-bay-be
Originally posted by MD

Originally posted by g-bay-be





you'll lose by 70+


Lol, fuck off 70+.



let me put it this way. you'll lose by more than what BLPP will beat winona warriors. and we plan on winning by at least 50. we actually plan on throwing the ball


by 50 eh so if you don't its on record as being an epic fail?
 
ShotPutNC
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MD
Originally posted by ShotPutNC

Originally posted by MD


Originally posted by g-bay-be






you'll lose by 70+


Lol, fuck off 70+.



It wont be close...


You said 70+, care to wager on that?


I didn't say 70+, I just said it wont be close.
 
g-bay-be
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MD
Originally posted by ShotPutNC

Originally posted by MD


Originally posted by g-bay-be






you'll lose by 70+


Lol, fuck off 70+.



It wont be close...


You said 70+, care to wager on that?



I can't bet on this because knowing tiger bait they will set their AI to punt on first down once they are up 50 just to fuck around
 
g-bay-be
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PFDS
Originally posted by g-bay-be

Originally posted by MD


Originally posted by g-bay-be






you'll lose by 70+


Lol, fuck off 70+.



let me put it this way. you'll lose by more than what BLPP will beat winona warriors. and we plan on winning by at least 50. we actually plan on throwing the ball


by 50 eh so if you don't its on record as being an epic fail?



lol yeah. you can count it as an epic fail
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.