Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Byrney
I don't really understand, what are you giving points based on?

Top team in the confernece (east or west) to bottom team in the conference. However you want to decide how you rank the teams is entirely up to you.

Originally posted by Byrney
I don't really understand, what are you giving points based on?

See page 1.

This is basically a respect poll. Obviously, it's rooted in stats like team record, points scored vs points againts, gameplanning, etc. but just because a team has the best record doesn't mean they are the most respected or considered "the best team in the league."

Some teams are considered overrated/underrated. You can vote it how you see it

Originally posted by BDizzle80
Originally posted by Uncle Buck

you can only count the Owners votes.

Some teams have more GMs than others.



Wouldn't matter. It would be an average of the team's total votes.

it does matter.

you should leave it to 1 person per team votes. Just like they do in college.

Originally posted by Uncle Buck
Originally posted by BDizzle80

Originally posted by Uncle Buck


you can only count the Owners votes.

Some teams have more GMs than others.



Wouldn't matter. It would be an average of the team's total votes.

it does matter.

you should leave it to 1 person per team votes. Just like they do in college.

I guess I should since you say so...


...


I'll run them both and see what they come out to be.

Originally posted by Uncle Buck

it does matter.

you should leave it to 1 person per team votes. Just like they do in college.


Actually, not at all. We are taking an average rather than a tally because not every team is voting.

If EVERY team had a voter here, we could take the tally, but since we don't, we can't. If we were doing a tally, for example and only 6 teams voted, those teams would suffer greatly because they each would be missing from one vote card, while the other 10 are in every vote. Because of this, an average is NECESSARY, and because it's an average, it doesn't matter how many from each team.

Are we ever going to total the tallies?

Originally posted by MonteA
Are we ever going to total the tallies?

See my post on pg 2

Originally posted by thunderdoozer
Originally posted by Uncle Buck


it does matter.

you should leave it to 1 person per team votes. Just like they do in college.


Actually, not at all. We are taking an average rather than a tally because not every team is voting.

If EVERY team had a voter here, we could take the tally, but since we don't, we can't. If we were doing a tally, for example and only 6 teams voted, those teams would suffer greatly because they each would be missing from one vote card, while the other 10 are in every vote. Because of this, an average is NECESSARY, and because it's an average, it doesn't matter how many from each team.


Actually, it still matters even if you are doing the avg, which is fine. it should still be 1 vote per team. Cause if the entire staff from badlands for example do not like a certain team, they can bury them on their rankings and it will effect the avg ranking. even though this is just for shits and giggles, it should be done as fair as possible.

It can't be one vote per team unless EVERY team votes. If they don't then the teams that DO vote will slide down in the rankings because they only got voted for 5/6 times. The rankings would be very skewed at that point.

Originally posted by Uncle Buck
Actually, it still matters even if you are doing the avg, which is fine. it should still be 1 vote per team. Cause if the entire staff from badlands for example do not like a certain team, they can bury them on their rankings and it will effect the avg ranking. even though this is just for shits and giggles, it should be done as fair as possible.

LOL, so what if every owner from 10 teams do not like a certain team? They can just bury them on their rankings and it would effect the tally ranking.

How many from each team doesn't matter.

Originally posted by ChrisRichey
It can't be one vote per team unless EVERY team votes. If they don't then the teams that DO vote will slide down in the rankings because they only got voted for 5/6 times. The rankings would be very skewed at that point.

Point.

this is only going to work if each team is represented anyway.

Originally posted by thunderdoozer
Originally posted by Uncle Buck

Actually, it still matters even if you are doing the avg, which is fine. it should still be 1 vote per team. Cause if the entire staff from badlands for example do not like a certain team, they can bury them on their rankings and it will effect the avg ranking. even though this is just for shits and giggles, it should be done as fair as possible.

LOL, so what if every owner from 10 teams do not like a certain team? They can just bury them on their rankings and it would effect the tally ranking.

How many from each team doesn't matter.

if ten owners think that a certain team sucks then guess what...odds are that team sucks.

Originally posted by Uncle Buck
if ten owners think that a certain team sucks then guess what...odds are that team sucks.


Point.

The same goes for GMs. Which, of course, supports my idea that it doesn't matter how many coaches from each team vote.

You know what, I give up.

You guys figure it out. I don't plan on still being stuck in this league next season anyway.

Originally posted by thunderdoozer
Originally posted by Uncle Buck

if ten owners think that a certain team sucks then guess what...odds are that team sucks.


Point.

The same goes for GMs. Which, of course, supports my idea that it doesn't matter how many coaches from each team vote.

You know what, I give up.

You guys figure it out. I don't plan on still being stuck in this league next season anyway.

I think this has gotten too complicated at this point...and does it really matter?
Vote if you wish...we have a few owners in the Western BBB who NEVER post, so how you gonna do this?