Warrior General Games

Originally posted by joeyjojok
Garuda PLEASE take notice and stop the insanity....

Are you guys really trying to compare yourselves to us up here in NAGA.... You must be kidding, we are having an off year as well as some of the other teams but you all wouldnt stand a chance if your teams where up here...

with the exception of a few teams your whole conference would get beaten by (lost city idols or Okinawa Leathernecks or Duluth Bulldogs) whom currently is also having a bad year and they are all at 4-8...

Naga is like "p" in receipt.....they don't do shit, and nobody want's to hear about 'em. Stay out of our thread troll.

Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks
Originally posted by joeyjojok

Garuda PLEASE take notice and stop the insanity....

Are you guys really trying to compare yourselves to us up here in NAGA.... You must be kidding, we are having an off year as well as some of the other teams but you all wouldnt stand a chance if your teams where up here...

with the exception of a few teams your whole conference would get beaten by (lost city idols or Okinawa Leathernecks or Duluth Bulldogs) whom currently is also having a bad year and they are all at 4-8...

That's bullshit.

I know it was just a scrimmage, but we killed Duluth this season.

We killed them regular season.

Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks
Originally posted by sirallan

lol not at all.

ex: not one 255-0 win this season

Only half the conference has a winning record.

maybe because there are not 5 free wins?

Originally posted by LaSeeno
We killed them regular season.

Still very early in the season and I know that there Ai from game 1 was very different then it was in game 7.
In a RM you guys would lose IMO.

Originally posted by jrg42
Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks

Originally posted by sirallan


lol not at all.

ex: not one 255-0 win this season

Only half the conference has a winning record.

maybe because there are not 5 free wins?

But competitive teams would win more than 2 games. That is the antithesis of competitive.

what does 5 free wins have to do with the competitiveness of the rest of the league...all the teams get 5 free wins, and are now battling it out amongst themselves...Sure it's gay to have these teams in the division, but it really means nothing, it just leaves 11 good teams battling for 8 play off spots!

eh, we'll figure this out come super wok.

Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks
Originally posted by jrg42

Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks


Originally posted by sirallan



lol not at all.

ex: not one 255-0 win this season

Only half the conference has a winning record.

maybe because there are not 5 free wins?

But competitive teams would win more than 2 games. That is the antithesis of competitive.

look. there was comment made about "half the teams in the league don't have winning records" which is stupid if there is more competition week in week out . Notice the huge break in # of wins between the 'best' gutted team and Manila? That is the antithesis of competitive. Add 5 free wins to Quahog and then they have the same record as Manila.

well the fact of the matter is competitiveness is still there, because 3-11 teams have 4-6 losses...and none of them came from gutted teams, everyone is beating everyone, that's some great competition no matter how many guts there are...

3-11 in naga is 2 losses to 9 losses, not as many gutted teams in naga, but still some teams getting there asses handed to em...and not being competitive.

Originally posted by jrg42
Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks

Originally posted by jrg42


Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks



Originally posted by sirallan




lol not at all.

ex: not one 255-0 win this season

Only half the conference has a winning record.

maybe because there are not 5 free wins?

But competitive teams would win more than 2 games. That is the antithesis of competitive.

look. there was comment made about "half the teams in the league don't have winning records" which is stupid if there is more competition week in week out . Notice the huge break in # of wins between the 'best' gutted team and Manila? That is the antithesis of competitive. Add 5 free wins to Quahog and then they have the same record as Manila.

There are 11 competitive teams in Garuda, and 5 gutted teams. Any one of those teams is capable of beating another one of those teams (except for LSP, apparently).

There are maybe 9 or so competitive teams in Naga and 7 or so that would be much more competitive in AAA.

if you don't think the 11th place team, Okinawa, is competitive then, you're an idiot.

lol. not sure why this is such big argument at least it keeps the boards active.

Originally posted by jrg42
if you don't think the 11th place team, Okinawa, is competitive then, you're an idiot.

lol. not sure why this is such big argument at least it keeps the boards active.

Well they're not competing for a playoff spot, are they?

Originally posted by jrg42
if you don't think the 11th place team, Okinawa, is competitive then, you're an idiot.

lol. not sure why this is such big argument at least it keeps the boards active.

i don't nkow where the big argument came from either, i just thought i was pretty cool that we had 6 teams all tied with the same record! And all battling for home plya off seeds

Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks
Originally posted by jrg42

if you don't think the 11th place team, Okinawa, is competitive then, you're an idiot.

lol. not sure why this is such big argument at least it keeps the boards active.

Well they're not competing for a playoff spot, are they?

they would be if they were in Garuda, no worse than 7-6