User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > North American Pro League > USA Conference > GLB's Top Pro Teams (Discuss)
Page:
 
Link
 
Of course it counts.
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by remus7x
Originally posted by Galkuris

Originally posted by Painmaker


We've got both Minnesota and Bandar Lumpung coming up shortly, and I think they're each ranked a bit low for what they've done. Minnesota may have gotten off to a slow start but they're top 10 material imo. Wolfpack a bit high for what we've accomplished so far (ask me again next week!), and it's surprising to see OTR wasn't higher on more ballots.


Ya, it honestly does amaze me that they said we weren't even on some peoples ballots. I may be biased but ranking us anything lower than 25th is just flat out ignorant .


I would be inclined to agree, especially cuz I would regard MM as the the 4th best team in the west (just based purely on performance so far this year) when the 3 teams in front of them make up 3 of the top 5


I'm interested to see how the BSB vs MM game plays out. We're both pretty similar, imo, both with solid defenses. I suppose the MEM/Lincoln games are benchmarks which on paper tip for MM, but I think it'll be a hell of a game regardless.

I haven't worked out the schedules yet, but at first glance I think we may have another BSB/MM playoff matchup. I think Galk is pretty familiar with that game: http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=204202

 
Galkuris
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
Originally posted by remus7x

Originally posted by Galkuris


Originally posted by Painmaker



We've got both Minnesota and Bandar Lumpung coming up shortly, and I think they're each ranked a bit low for what they've done. Minnesota may have gotten off to a slow start but they're top 10 material imo. Wolfpack a bit high for what we've accomplished so far (ask me again next week!), and it's surprising to see OTR wasn't higher on more ballots.


Ya, it honestly does amaze me that they said we weren't even on some peoples ballots. I may be biased but ranking us anything lower than 25th is just flat out ignorant .


I would be inclined to agree, especially cuz I would regard MM as the the 4th best team in the west (just based purely on performance so far this year) when the 3 teams in front of them make up 3 of the top 5


I'm interested to see how the BSB vs MM game plays out. We're both pretty similar, imo, both with solid defenses. I suppose the MEM/Lincoln games are benchmarks which on paper tip for MM, but I think it'll be a hell of a game regardless.

I haven't worked out the schedules yet, but at first glance I think we may have another BSB/MM playoff matchup. I think Galk is pretty familiar with that game: http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=204202



I knew that score was coming before we even started. We weren't that good of a team yet and you bunch of goobers didn't boost/spend SP all season.
 
PP
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by xcoach2

OTR and Green Bay were tough to rank because lack of friendly/tourney games. I think both are better than a lot of teams ranked ahead of them but how do you rank them above teams that are playing everyday with tourneys & reg season games? There were too many undefeated or 1 loss reg season teams with active friendly/tourney resume's in other leagues and both OTR & GB have two regular season losses.

On the other hand I completely understand GB's situation as far as friendlies/tourneys and tooley has explained OTR's but it's tough to overlook teams that are playing/game planning every day. Shit, GB was left off a lot of ballots. If you do not play tourneys/friendlies it's tough to make the early rankings...but if you win the USPL championship you're immediately forgiven, lol. Washington in S7 and Boston in S6 played less than stellar friendlies and both were immediately jumped into the top 4 with a USA pro championship.


Don't sweat it, x...I appreciate what you did for us. As far as us being hard to rank higher, I understand and am fine with that.

Edit: I appreciate anyone that voted for us....And I loved your comment, magic LOL

Last edited Mar 17, 2009 20:10:14
 
jktooley
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by xcoach2
Originally posted by Painmaker

We've got both Minnesota and Bandar Lumpung coming up shortly, and I think they're each ranked a bit low for what they've done. Minnesota may have gotten off to a slow start but they're top 10 material imo. Wolfpack a bit high for what we've accomplished so far (ask me again next week!), and it's surprising to see OTR wasn't higher on more ballots.


OTR and Green Bay were tough to rank because lack of friendly/tourney games. I think both are better than a lot of teams ranked ahead of them but how do you rank them above teams that are playing everyday with tourneys & reg season games? There were too many undefeated or 1 loss reg season teams with active friendly/tourney resume's in other leagues and both OTR & GB have two regular season losses.

On the other hand I completely understand GB's situation as far as friendlies/tourneys and tooley has explained OTR's but it's tough to overlook teams that are playing/game planning every day. Shit, GB was left off a lot of ballots. If you do not play tourneys/friendlies it's tough to make the early rankings...but if you win the USPL championship you're immediately forgiven, lol. Washington in S7 and Boston in S6 played less than stellar friendlies and both were immediately jumped into the top 4 with a USA pro championship.


Nope... Not a worry... I just don't get into friendlies the same way. The day I start gameplanning and setting tactics for a game that's not on our regular schedule is the day I burn out completely from GLB....
 
23yrwej
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jktooley
Originally posted by xcoach2

Originally posted by Painmaker


We've got both Minnesota and Bandar Lumpung coming up shortly, and I think they're each ranked a bit low for what they've done. Minnesota may have gotten off to a slow start but they're top 10 material imo. Wolfpack a bit high for what we've accomplished so far (ask me again next week!), and it's surprising to see OTR wasn't higher on more ballots.


OTR and Green Bay were tough to rank because lack of friendly/tourney games. I think both are better than a lot of teams ranked ahead of them but how do you rank them above teams that are playing everyday with tourneys & reg season games? There were too many undefeated or 1 loss reg season teams with active friendly/tourney resume's in other leagues and both OTR & GB have two regular season losses.

On the other hand I completely understand GB's situation as far as friendlies/tourneys and tooley has explained OTR's but it's tough to overlook teams that are playing/game planning every day. Shit, GB was left off a lot of ballots. If you do not play tourneys/friendlies it's tough to make the early rankings...but if you win the USPL championship you're immediately forgiven, lol. Washington in S7 and Boston in S6 played less than stellar friendlies and both were immediately jumped into the top 4 with a USA pro championship.


Nope... Not a worry... I just don't get into friendlies the same way. The day I start gameplanning and setting tactics for a game that's not on our regular schedule is the day I burn out completely from GLB....


And we all know I am way too lazy to set tactics for Friendlies.

 
Sik Wit It
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jktooley
Originally posted by xcoach2

Originally posted by Painmaker


We've got both Minnesota and Bandar Lumpung coming up shortly, and I think they're each ranked a bit low for what they've done. Minnesota may have gotten off to a slow start but they're top 10 material imo. Wolfpack a bit high for what we've accomplished so far (ask me again next week!), and it's surprising to see OTR wasn't higher on more ballots.


OTR and Green Bay were tough to rank because lack of friendly/tourney games. I think both are better than a lot of teams ranked ahead of them but how do you rank them above teams that are playing everyday with tourneys & reg season games? There were too many undefeated or 1 loss reg season teams with active friendly/tourney resume's in other leagues and both OTR & GB have two regular season losses.

On the other hand I completely understand GB's situation as far as friendlies/tourneys and tooley has explained OTR's but it's tough to overlook teams that are playing/game planning every day. Shit, GB was left off a lot of ballots. If you do not play tourneys/friendlies it's tough to make the early rankings...but if you win the USPL championship you're immediately forgiven, lol. Washington in S7 and Boston in S6 played less than stellar friendlies and both were immediately jumped into the top 4 with a USA pro championship.


Nope... Not a worry... I just don't get into friendlies the same way. The day I start gameplanning and setting tactics for a game that's not on our regular schedule is the day I burn out completely from GLB....


Like I said in that other topic, I'm sure like 90% of teams don't gameplan or set tactics for scrims.
 
jktooley
offline
Link
 
Probably/possibly true... If that's the case, not sure why we suck so much in friendlies, and are damned good in the regular season compared to other top teams....

well, I do, just sayin'.
 
Sik Wit It
offline
Link
 
Maybe you guys just aren't as good as you think you are .
 
jktooley
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Sik Wit It
Maybe you guys just aren't as good as you think you are .


maybe we just gameplan really well
 
Modok
offline
Link
 
Spicewood is so fucking inconsistent. We have beaten several teams on there, had a close loss to WSI, were winning the MEM game going into the 4th....then just get fucking smacked by WW and MM.
 
tonynf89
offline
Link
 
By Top Teams, Do they mean Weather-wise?

South Bay ftw baby
Last edited Mar 17, 2009 22:21:27
 
Sik Wit It
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tonynf89
By Top Teams, Do they mean Weather-wise?

South Bay ftw baby


Are you the South Bay near LA and Long Beach or South Bay area in Nor Cal?
 
robponce
offline
Link
 
I ranked USA Pro 1-32.

I just lied.
 
The Duff Man
offline
Link
 
I would put 16 US Pro teams in the top 50. Possibly top 40.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.