Warrior General Games

But that's what makes Spicewood's case so funny - we have a ton of depth and always have, and we had nobody with league leading stats last season - the closest was Hugh, the QB, and he didn't get an endorsement.

It's quite funny that some teams get 7+ and all the others get 0 or 1.

I don't think endorsements are any great advantage at all, they are more just for fun imo (unless they give some super bonus, which I doubt, but I may be wrong), but still quite annoying. I'd rather have 11 players from different teams or maybe 2/3 for one team... but not 7-10.

Anyway, congratulations to those who got it... I don't want to sound a fool, but where do I check if we got any? LOL

League page.

The players will have a little red $ sign next to their fame rating as well on the player profile.

Oh damnit! We got 0 and CCCC got 8 lol

Oh well... maybe next season

Originally posted by rj414
But that's what makes Spicewood's case so funny - we have a ton of depth and always have, and we had nobody with league leading stats last season - the closest was Hugh, the QB, and he didn't get an endorsement.

Seems like the Champ gets 6-9
Runner up gets 2-4

And the rest are random / stat based.

Originally posted by Luzod

I don't think endorsements are any great advantage at all

My OT from SA Pro got one. +2 Agility, +2 Strength, +2 Blocking, +1 Pass Block Tree

Seems like a good advantage to me when you have teams with 7-10 players getting them.

Originally posted by Galkuris
Originally posted by rj414

But that's what makes Spicewood's case so funny - we have a ton of depth and always have, and we had nobody with league leading stats last season - the closest was Hugh, the QB, and he didn't get an endorsement.

Seems like the Champ gets 6-9
Runner up gets 2-4

And the rest are random / stat based.

No way, we got 0. San Diego got 3. It's quite random I guess, but I'm surprised to see 7+ going for the same team.

Look, I'm not saying we should have got one, I'm just saying it's weird to see 7 endorsements to the same team. I said it after checking USA Pro (reading this topic) and before checking my own league tbh.

Originally posted by The Duff Man
Originally posted by Luzod


I don't think endorsements are any great advantage at all

My OT from SA Pro got one. +2 Agility, +2 Strength, +2 Blocking, +1 Pass Block Tree

Seems like a good advantage to me when you have teams with 7-10 players getting them.


:O

I didn't know they were that good... sound quite unfair now tbh...

All i want to know is...

What's the point of having overall fame, when endorsements are only based on the previous season???

Originally posted by dontmeswidme
All i want to know is...

What's the point of having overall fame, when endorsements are only based on the previous season???

Good luck getting an answer to that one.

Originally posted by dontmeswidme
All i want to know is...

What's the point of having overall fame, when endorsements are only based on the previous season???

I dunno, but being based on previous season makes more sense for me tbh... but I think stats should count more than championship imo, or we'll just see a team getting 7~9 endorsements while all the others get 0...

WSI got 8 or so... as if they weren't good enough without it

Anyway, I'm quite pissed with they way they are distributed tbh...

Originally posted by Luzod
Originally posted by The Duff Man

Originally posted by Luzod



I don't think endorsements are any great advantage at all

My OT from SA Pro got one. +2 Agility, +2 Strength, +2 Blocking, +1 Pass Block Tree

Seems like a good advantage to me when you have teams with 7-10 players getting them.


:O

I didn't know they were that good... sound quite unfair now tbh...

The Pro level ones seem to boost an entire tree - the AAA level ones give the same +2 boost to 2 or 3 stats and a boost to higher special and a chance or a boost to 2 specials.

Another retarded idea by bort, no shocker there though

Originally posted by Luzod
Originally posted by dontmeswidme

All i want to know is...

What's the point of having overall fame, when endorsements are only based on the previous season???

I dunno, but being based on previous season makes more sense for me tbh... but I think stats should count more than championship imo, or we'll just see a team getting 7~9 endorsements while all the others get 0...

WSI got 8 or so... as if they weren't good enough without it

Anyway, I'm quite pissed with they way they are distributed tbh...

if it makes more sense just having it based on the previous season then what's the point of having overall fame? Bort might as well reset fame each season if this is how endorsements get handed out. I mean how are you going to punish players that have been great for past seasons that never got a chance at endorsements, and basically just hand it out to the current champs?

Congrats to hgl though he definitely earned it.