Everyone that comes to the USA BBB assumes they're going to dominate. You know what they say about assuming.
ultrajer
offline
offline
Originally posted by grantham
Originally posted by Alky
NY been waiting for this league for a couple seasons now after our roids came in we should be a sure thing. and dont trust the bars just the record that we r about to have.
I mostly trust the record you just had. Even if you go 16-0, that's still 16-16 as far as I'm concerned.
That would be like 16-48 BTW, we started in AAA as level 1's
Originally posted by Alky
NY been waiting for this league for a couple seasons now after our roids came in we should be a sure thing. and dont trust the bars just the record that we r about to have.
I mostly trust the record you just had. Even if you go 16-0, that's still 16-16 as far as I'm concerned.
That would be like 16-48 BTW, we started in AAA as level 1's
Nitrolst
offline
offline
Originally posted by Krunchy
Originally posted by BigCowboysFan
Yeah but we'll have something in the trophy cabinet...you won't.
They give trophies for second place?
No, so you won't get one!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by BigCowboysFan
Yeah but we'll have something in the trophy cabinet...you won't.
They give trophies for second place?
No, so you won't get one!!!!!!!!!!
BigCowboysFan
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cponyman
Everyone that comes to the USA BBB assumes they're going to dominate. You know what they say about assuming.
My entire life I have been taught to stand up for my beliefs, to be a person of high morals and ethics. That's why I feel obligated to reinforce what is best in people. For the sake of review, the gods of mandarinism and prætorianism figure prominently in Cponyman's personal pantheon. That much is crystal clear. But did you know that one positive outcome of the Law of Unintended Consequences is that if we stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts then Cponyman won't be able to burn his opponents at the stake? That's why I'm telling you that he claims that his vices are the only true virtues. I avouch that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that Cponyman's devotees have demonstrated brutally, horribly, and with great terror how they will uproot our very heritage and pave the way for Cponyman's own huffy value system. Hence and therefore, he maintains that intolerant mythomaniacs are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. This is complete—or at least, incomplete—baloney. For instance, Cponyman fails to mention that in his crotchets, classism is witting and unremitting, disrespectful and careless. He revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to alter laws, language, and customs in the service of regulating social relations.
The very genesis of Cponyman's complacent, sneaky perorations is in commercialism. And it seems to me to be a neat bit of historic justice that he will eventually himself be destroyed by commercialism. Cponyman deeply believes that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the truth is very simple: Cponyman has come up with proven methods to lay the foundation for some serious mischief. All you have to do is let your guard down. I can't understand why he has to be so politically incorrect. Maybe a dybbuk has taken up residence inside his head and is making him impose tremendous hardships on tens of thousands of decent, hard-working individuals. It's a bit more likely, however, that if we briefly prescind from the main point of this letter we can focus on how Cponyman would have us believe that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of pestiferous stereotypes. Not surprisingly, his evidence for that completely batty claim is top-heavy with anonymous sources and, to put it mildly, he has a checkered track record for accuracy. I assert it would be more accurate for Cponyman to say that he can't fool me. I've met hotheaded nonentities before, so I know that there is a format Cponyman should follow for his next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.
I suspect that Cponyman will indisputably withhold information and disseminate half truths and whole lies before the year is over. I base this confident prediction on, among other things, the fact that his cause is not glorious. It is not wonderful. It is not good.
Forgive me for boring you with all the gory details, but I correctly predicted that Cponyman would remake the world to suit his own jealous needs. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively—or so soon. Whenever someone tells him not to dismantle the guard rails that protect society from the contumelious elements in its midst, Cponyman gets all teary-eyed. My, my; how sad. My heart bleeds for him; it really does.
Do you really think Cponyman will ever learn from his mistakes? We can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we definitely have to shine a light on his efforts to lead to the destruction of the human race.
My purpose is to break the spell of great expectations that now binds nutty lamebrains to Cponyman. Most of the battles I fight along the way are exigencies, not long-range educational activities. Nevertheless, Cponyman keeps missing my point. More specifically, he keeps getting hung up on my words without seeing the underlying meaning. For example, when I say that Cponyman owns drawers and boxes full of legal documents, which he is convinced prove his position, Cponyman seems incapable of realizing that what I'm really getting at is that ignominious schnorrers are unable to see that one truism with profound implications is that his conniving maneuvers run counter to human nature and, as such, are doomed to failure. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: He should not seize control of the power structure. Not now, not ever.
My long-term goal is to ratchet up our level of understanding. Unfortunately, much remains to be done. As you may have noticed, I stand by what I've written before, that Cponyman says that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. Yet he also wants to befuddle the public and make sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because he always looks the other way when one of his minions gets it in his head to show a clear lack of respect not just for those brave souls who fought and died for what they believed in but also for you, the readers of this letter. Apparently, the principle laid down by Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois during the French Reign of Terror still holds true today: Tout est permis à quiconque agit dans le sens de la révolution.
In the immediate years ahead, Cponyman might be diagnosed with a special type of mental illness that is not yet recognized. But for now, be aware that even when the facts don't fit, he sometimes tries to use them anyway. He still maintains, for instance, that he values our perspectives.
I, not being one of the many daft sandbaggers of this world, must point out that Cponyman is stepping over the line when he attempts to declare martial law, suspend elections, and round up dissidents (i.e., anyone who does not buy his lie that his smear tactics are Right with a capital R)—way over the line. While it's true that no one is more quixotic than Cponyman, he has yet to acknowledge that fact. It is common knowledge that he really struck a nerve with me when he said that society is screaming for his allegations. That lie is a painful reminder that Cponyman is inherently predatory, prodigal, and crude. Oh, and he also has a villainous mode of existence.
Don't get me wrong; Cponyman regards himself as both omniscient and omnicompetent, fully qualified to put any intellectual discipline in the world in its place. But Cponyman does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, he discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent. Just between you and me, he contends that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength and that, therefore, once he has approved of something it can't possibly be shabby. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces hypocritical, inerudite sensualists (as distinct from the unpatriotic nobodies who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the sappy hands of directionless maniacs. In reality, contrariwise, someone just showed me a memo supposedly written by Cponyman. The memo spells out his plans to construct the spectre of a terrible armed threat. If this memo is authentic, it tells us that juvenile exhibitionists of one sort or another often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Cponyman enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever he threatens to cast the world into nuclear holocaust. Thus, in summing up, we can establish the following: 1) In Cponyman's writing, words and meaning have almost parted company, and 2) we have come full-circle.
Everyone that comes to the USA BBB assumes they're going to dominate. You know what they say about assuming.
My entire life I have been taught to stand up for my beliefs, to be a person of high morals and ethics. That's why I feel obligated to reinforce what is best in people. For the sake of review, the gods of mandarinism and prætorianism figure prominently in Cponyman's personal pantheon. That much is crystal clear. But did you know that one positive outcome of the Law of Unintended Consequences is that if we stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts then Cponyman won't be able to burn his opponents at the stake? That's why I'm telling you that he claims that his vices are the only true virtues. I avouch that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that Cponyman's devotees have demonstrated brutally, horribly, and with great terror how they will uproot our very heritage and pave the way for Cponyman's own huffy value system. Hence and therefore, he maintains that intolerant mythomaniacs are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. This is complete—or at least, incomplete—baloney. For instance, Cponyman fails to mention that in his crotchets, classism is witting and unremitting, disrespectful and careless. He revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to alter laws, language, and customs in the service of regulating social relations.
The very genesis of Cponyman's complacent, sneaky perorations is in commercialism. And it seems to me to be a neat bit of historic justice that he will eventually himself be destroyed by commercialism. Cponyman deeply believes that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the truth is very simple: Cponyman has come up with proven methods to lay the foundation for some serious mischief. All you have to do is let your guard down. I can't understand why he has to be so politically incorrect. Maybe a dybbuk has taken up residence inside his head and is making him impose tremendous hardships on tens of thousands of decent, hard-working individuals. It's a bit more likely, however, that if we briefly prescind from the main point of this letter we can focus on how Cponyman would have us believe that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of pestiferous stereotypes. Not surprisingly, his evidence for that completely batty claim is top-heavy with anonymous sources and, to put it mildly, he has a checkered track record for accuracy. I assert it would be more accurate for Cponyman to say that he can't fool me. I've met hotheaded nonentities before, so I know that there is a format Cponyman should follow for his next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.
I suspect that Cponyman will indisputably withhold information and disseminate half truths and whole lies before the year is over. I base this confident prediction on, among other things, the fact that his cause is not glorious. It is not wonderful. It is not good.
Forgive me for boring you with all the gory details, but I correctly predicted that Cponyman would remake the world to suit his own jealous needs. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively—or so soon. Whenever someone tells him not to dismantle the guard rails that protect society from the contumelious elements in its midst, Cponyman gets all teary-eyed. My, my; how sad. My heart bleeds for him; it really does.
Do you really think Cponyman will ever learn from his mistakes? We can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we definitely have to shine a light on his efforts to lead to the destruction of the human race.
My purpose is to break the spell of great expectations that now binds nutty lamebrains to Cponyman. Most of the battles I fight along the way are exigencies, not long-range educational activities. Nevertheless, Cponyman keeps missing my point. More specifically, he keeps getting hung up on my words without seeing the underlying meaning. For example, when I say that Cponyman owns drawers and boxes full of legal documents, which he is convinced prove his position, Cponyman seems incapable of realizing that what I'm really getting at is that ignominious schnorrers are unable to see that one truism with profound implications is that his conniving maneuvers run counter to human nature and, as such, are doomed to failure. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: He should not seize control of the power structure. Not now, not ever.
My long-term goal is to ratchet up our level of understanding. Unfortunately, much remains to be done. As you may have noticed, I stand by what I've written before, that Cponyman says that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. Yet he also wants to befuddle the public and make sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because he always looks the other way when one of his minions gets it in his head to show a clear lack of respect not just for those brave souls who fought and died for what they believed in but also for you, the readers of this letter. Apparently, the principle laid down by Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois during the French Reign of Terror still holds true today: Tout est permis à quiconque agit dans le sens de la révolution.
In the immediate years ahead, Cponyman might be diagnosed with a special type of mental illness that is not yet recognized. But for now, be aware that even when the facts don't fit, he sometimes tries to use them anyway. He still maintains, for instance, that he values our perspectives.
I, not being one of the many daft sandbaggers of this world, must point out that Cponyman is stepping over the line when he attempts to declare martial law, suspend elections, and round up dissidents (i.e., anyone who does not buy his lie that his smear tactics are Right with a capital R)—way over the line. While it's true that no one is more quixotic than Cponyman, he has yet to acknowledge that fact. It is common knowledge that he really struck a nerve with me when he said that society is screaming for his allegations. That lie is a painful reminder that Cponyman is inherently predatory, prodigal, and crude. Oh, and he also has a villainous mode of existence.
Don't get me wrong; Cponyman regards himself as both omniscient and omnicompetent, fully qualified to put any intellectual discipline in the world in its place. But Cponyman does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, he discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent. Just between you and me, he contends that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength and that, therefore, once he has approved of something it can't possibly be shabby. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces hypocritical, inerudite sensualists (as distinct from the unpatriotic nobodies who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the sappy hands of directionless maniacs. In reality, contrariwise, someone just showed me a memo supposedly written by Cponyman. The memo spells out his plans to construct the spectre of a terrible armed threat. If this memo is authentic, it tells us that juvenile exhibitionists of one sort or another often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Cponyman enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever he threatens to cast the world into nuclear holocaust. Thus, in summing up, we can establish the following: 1) In Cponyman's writing, words and meaning have almost parted company, and 2) we have come full-circle.
Cponyman
offline
offline
I'm not sure if kaopectate works for verbal diarrhea or not but you could try it. I am very liberal towards views other than my own, no matter how wrong they are. I just choose to relate to them in a more succinct fashion. We shall chat again. As the season progresses we shall see if your righteous indignation holds value or nay. We will see who is omniscient.
BigCowboysFan
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cponyman
I'm not sure if kaopectate works for verbal diarrhea or not but you could try it. I am very liberal towards views other than my own, no matter how wrong they are. I just choose to relate to them in a more succinct fashion. We shall chat again. As the season progresses we shall see if your righteous indignation holds value or nay. We will see who is omniscient.
Resistance is futile.
I'm not sure if kaopectate works for verbal diarrhea or not but you could try it. I am very liberal towards views other than my own, no matter how wrong they are. I just choose to relate to them in a more succinct fashion. We shall chat again. As the season progresses we shall see if your righteous indignation holds value or nay. We will see who is omniscient.
Resistance is futile.
Krunchy
offline
offline
Pertinacious. Muzzy-headed. Biased. In case you can't tell, I'm making a direct reference to BigCowboysFan. I urge you to read the text that follows carefully, keeping an open mind, from the beginning to the end, and without skipping around. I further recommend that you take breaks, as many of the facts presented will take time to digest. While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, materialism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's BigCowboysFan's favorite; it makes it easy for it to practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of venal, unambitious death cult.
If I were a complete sap, I'd believe BigCowboysFan's line that it has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. Unfortunately for it, I realize that I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about BigCowboysFan's hijinks. It's quite likely it will try to retaliate against me for my telling you that in its circulars, sexism is witting and unremitting, unctuous and audacious. It revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to place gutless self-proclaimed arbiters of taste and standards (especially the tyrannical type) at the top of the social hierarchy.
Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of fatuitous new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. What really irks me is that BigCowboysFan has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it evade responsibility or it'll shackle us with the chains of authoritarianism. BigCowboysFan thinks that its principles can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. However, it frequently writes self-contradictory, nonsensical "sentences" that are actually just phrases or sentence fragments filled with grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation errors. That's all for this letter. For those that don't like my views, get over it. I assert that I have as much a right to my views, and to express them, as anyone else. So when I say that for the time being, this is not a major issue, you can agree with me or not. That's all there is to it.
If I were a complete sap, I'd believe BigCowboysFan's line that it has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. Unfortunately for it, I realize that I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about BigCowboysFan's hijinks. It's quite likely it will try to retaliate against me for my telling you that in its circulars, sexism is witting and unremitting, unctuous and audacious. It revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to place gutless self-proclaimed arbiters of taste and standards (especially the tyrannical type) at the top of the social hierarchy.
Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of fatuitous new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. What really irks me is that BigCowboysFan has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it evade responsibility or it'll shackle us with the chains of authoritarianism. BigCowboysFan thinks that its principles can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. However, it frequently writes self-contradictory, nonsensical "sentences" that are actually just phrases or sentence fragments filled with grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation errors. That's all for this letter. For those that don't like my views, get over it. I assert that I have as much a right to my views, and to express them, as anyone else. So when I say that for the time being, this is not a major issue, you can agree with me or not. That's all there is to it.
BigCowboysFan
offline
offline
Originally posted by Krunchy
Pertinacious. Muzzy-headed. Biased. In case you can't tell, I'm making a direct reference to BigCowboysFan. I urge you to read the text that follows carefully, keeping an open mind, from the beginning to the end, and without skipping around. I further recommend that you take breaks, as many of the facts presented will take time to digest. While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, materialism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's BigCowboysFan's favorite; it makes it easy for it to practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of venal, unambitious death cult.
If I were a complete sap, I'd believe BigCowboysFan's line that it has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. Unfortunately for it, I realize that I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about BigCowboysFan's hijinks. It's quite likely it will try to retaliate against me for my telling you that in its circulars, sexism is witting and unremitting, unctuous and audacious. It revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to place gutless self-proclaimed arbiters of taste and standards (especially the tyrannical type) at the top of the social hierarchy.
Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of fatuitous new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. What really irks me is that BigCowboysFan has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it evade responsibility or it'll shackle us with the chains of authoritarianism. BigCowboysFan thinks that its principles can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. However, it frequently writes self-contradictory, nonsensical "sentences" that are actually just phrases or sentence fragments filled with grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation errors. That's all for this letter. For those that don't like my views, get over it. I assert that I have as much a right to my views, and to express them, as anyone else. So when I say that for the time being, this is not a major issue, you can agree with me or not. That's all there is to it.
Somebody found www.pakin.org/complaint like I did.
Pertinacious. Muzzy-headed. Biased. In case you can't tell, I'm making a direct reference to BigCowboysFan. I urge you to read the text that follows carefully, keeping an open mind, from the beginning to the end, and without skipping around. I further recommend that you take breaks, as many of the facts presented will take time to digest. While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, materialism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's BigCowboysFan's favorite; it makes it easy for it to practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of venal, unambitious death cult.
If I were a complete sap, I'd believe BigCowboysFan's line that it has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. Unfortunately for it, I realize that I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about BigCowboysFan's hijinks. It's quite likely it will try to retaliate against me for my telling you that in its circulars, sexism is witting and unremitting, unctuous and audacious. It revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to place gutless self-proclaimed arbiters of taste and standards (especially the tyrannical type) at the top of the social hierarchy.
Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of fatuitous new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. What really irks me is that BigCowboysFan has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it evade responsibility or it'll shackle us with the chains of authoritarianism. BigCowboysFan thinks that its principles can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. However, it frequently writes self-contradictory, nonsensical "sentences" that are actually just phrases or sentence fragments filled with grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation errors. That's all for this letter. For those that don't like my views, get over it. I assert that I have as much a right to my views, and to express them, as anyone else. So when I say that for the time being, this is not a major issue, you can agree with me or not. That's all there is to it.
Somebody found www.pakin.org/complaint like I did.
grantham
offline
offline
Originally posted by Motion15
what time do the games sim in the 16?
Noon Eastern, 9am Pacific. Even numbered days.
what time do the games sim in the 16?
Noon Eastern, 9am Pacific. Even numbered days.
Motion15
offline
offline
Originally posted by grantham
Originally posted by Motion15
what time do the games sim in the 16?
Noon Eastern, 9am Pacific. Even numbered days.
Thanks
Originally posted by Motion15
what time do the games sim in the 16?
Noon Eastern, 9am Pacific. Even numbered days.
Thanks
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
