Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Tim Harper
Originally posted by jfbueno

Originally posted by Tim Harper


Originally posted by datongw



Our 2nd half schedule is tougher than first half as well. We get SF, MM and MEM back to back.

3-0 sounds about right.

That's fine by us. We all know what happens in the playoffs when HHW beats MEM in the regular season

You lose in the playoffs after that?

Nope, learn your history.

Originally posted by jfbueno
Originally posted by Tim Harper

Originally posted by jfbueno


Originally posted by Tim Harper



Originally posted by datongw




Our 2nd half schedule is tougher than first half as well. We get SF, MM and MEM back to back.

3-0 sounds about right.

That's fine by us. We all know what happens in the playoffs when HHW beats MEM in the regular season

You lose in the playoffs after that?

Nope, learn your history.

Did history rewrite itself? Because im pretty sure MEM lost in the championship game...

Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by jfbueno

Originally posted by Tim Harper


Originally posted by jfbueno



Originally posted by Tim Harper




Originally posted by datongw





Our 2nd half schedule is tougher than first half as well. We get SF, MM and MEM back to back.

3-0 sounds about right.

That's fine by us. We all know what happens in the playoffs when HHW beats MEM in the regular season

You lose in the playoffs after that?

Nope, learn your history.

Did history rewrite itself? Because im pretty sure MEM lost in the championship game...

This is an argument about conference play Not interconference.

as with most online arguments two people having an argument over two different things

Originally posted by Romeorr
as with most online arguments two people having an argument over two different things

no they aren't

Originally posted by jfbueno
Originally posted by bhall43

Originally posted by jfbueno


Originally posted by Tim Harper



Originally posted by jfbueno




Originally posted by Tim Harper





Originally posted by datongw






Our 2nd half schedule is tougher than first half as well. We get SF, MM and MEM back to back.

3-0 sounds about right.

That's fine by us. We all know what happens in the playoffs when HHW beats MEM in the regular season

You lose in the playoffs after that?

Nope, learn your history.

Did history rewrite itself? Because im pretty sure MEM lost in the championship game...

This is an argument about conference play Not interconference.

really? because im pretty sure it was about the playoffs...maybe im reading Tim Harpers and joemiken's comments differently than you tho.

Originally posted by bhall43

really? because im pretty sure it was about the playoffs...maybe im reading Tim Harpers and joemiken's comments differently than you tho.

The difference is, that MEM has lost to HHW twice in the regular season and beat them both years. Thus "history".

You can't say the history is they lose the next game because that has only happened 1 of 2 times.

Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by jfbueno

Originally posted by bhall43


Originally posted by jfbueno



Originally posted by Tim Harper




Originally posted by jfbueno





Originally posted by Tim Harper






Originally posted by datongw







Our 2nd half schedule is tougher than first half as well. We get SF, MM and MEM back to back.

3-0 sounds about right.

That's fine by us. We all know what happens in the playoffs when HHW beats MEM in the regular season

You lose in the playoffs after that?

Nope, learn your history.

Did history rewrite itself? Because im pretty sure MEM lost in the championship game...

This is an argument about conference play Not interconference.

really? because im pretty sure it was about the playoffs...maybe im reading Tim Harpers and joemiken's comments differently than you tho.

Maybe you should relearn your history. Monmouth is 2-0 vs. HHW in the playoffs, 1 time they lost in the champ game, 1 time the champ game.

Lack of understanding FTW!

Originally posted by Galkuris
Originally posted by bhall43


really? because im pretty sure it was about the playoffs...maybe im reading Tim Harpers and joemiken's comments differently than you tho.

The difference is, that MEM has lost to HHW twice in the regular season and beat them both years. Thus "history".

You can't say the history is they lose the next game because that has only happened 1 of 2 times.



i know what the difference is...but only one of those instances was in Pro.

Are you SI Jr? *Does Best SI impression* Only Pro Trophies count, you beat up on little kids even though many of them are now in USA Pro. *End SI impression* lol

Originally posted by jrry32
Are you SI Jr? *Does Best SI impression* Only Pro Trophies count, you beat up on little kids even though many of them are now in USA Pro. *End SI impression* lol

who me? jf knows i only bust on him because i will never get over season 1....

I think we play the top 4 teams returning from last season in our first 6 games. We could easily be facing a 2-4 or worse start, but our second half will determine if we make the playoffs.

Originally posted by The Duff Man
I think we play the top 4 teams returning from last season in our first 6 games. We could easily be facing a 2-4 or worse start, but our second half will determine if we make the playoffs.

I would consider you a lock for the playoffs.

Originally posted by Doc
Originally posted by The Duff Man

I think we play the top 4 teams returning from last season in our first 6 games. We could easily be facing a 2-4 or worse start, but our second half will determine if we make the playoffs.

I would consider you a lock for the playoffs.



Not if they play like they did in Scrimmage #1 .