Any team that beats Korb performs an upset at this point in the season.
Congrats, and get the sand out of your vag.
Congrats, and get the sand out of your vag.
Koncorde
offline
offline
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Woodridge wins http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=212238
Bit annoyed with that one, see final 2 minutes of 2nd quarter for why.
Time-out? Anything? Please?
Woodridge wins http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=212238
Bit annoyed with that one, see final 2 minutes of 2nd quarter for why.
Time-out? Anything? Please?
Johnny Wad
offline
offline
Originally posted by ArthurRiot
Any team that beats Korb performs an upset at this point in the season.
Congrats, and get the sand out of your vag.
Any team that beats Korb performs an upset at this point in the season.
Congrats, and get the sand out of your vag.
vabills
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mike Rogers
Originally posted by vabills
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Originally posted by vabills
Originally posted by kalkmanc
PPP with a big upset over Korb http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=212383
Who said it was an upset? Just because you guys can't evaluate talent doesn't mean it was an upset.
I said it was an upset. Impressive win, but definitely an upset. Korb gave that game away with all those turnovers.
Oh I see because you say it was an upset.
It was an upset. Your were expected to lose and yyou won, thats the definition of an upset.
Game actually went as predicted, your running game stuttered to a 2.6 ypc avg and your QB was sacked 9 times.
Only difference was Korb throwing 4 INTs and that is never part of anyones gameplans even yours.
It was an Upset win, but they all count the same
Actually no, our running game didn't get 2.6 YPC. Bort has a bug where he counts sacks as runs. We were 36 carries for 160 yards in the running game. But since you guys can't eval talent I wouldn't expect you to understand that either.
Originally posted by vabills
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Originally posted by vabills
Originally posted by kalkmanc
PPP with a big upset over Korb http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=212383
Who said it was an upset? Just because you guys can't evaluate talent doesn't mean it was an upset.
I said it was an upset. Impressive win, but definitely an upset. Korb gave that game away with all those turnovers.
Oh I see because you say it was an upset.
It was an upset. Your were expected to lose and yyou won, thats the definition of an upset.
Game actually went as predicted, your running game stuttered to a 2.6 ypc avg and your QB was sacked 9 times.
Only difference was Korb throwing 4 INTs and that is never part of anyones gameplans even yours.
It was an Upset win, but they all count the same
Actually no, our running game didn't get 2.6 YPC. Bort has a bug where he counts sacks as runs. We were 36 carries for 160 yards in the running game. But since you guys can't eval talent I wouldn't expect you to understand that either.
djhoffman99
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mike Rogers
Originally posted by vabills
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Originally posted by vabills
Originally posted by kalkmanc
PPP with a big upset over Korb http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=212383
Who said it was an upset? Just because you guys can't evaluate talent doesn't mean it was an upset.
I said it was an upset. Impressive win, but definitely an upset. Korb gave that game away with all those turnovers.
Oh I see because you say it was an upset.
It was an upset. Your were expected to lose and yyou won, thats the definition of an upset.
Game actually went as predicted, your running game stuttered to a 2.6 ypc avg and your QB was sacked 9 times.
Only difference was Korb throwing 4 INTs and that is never part of anyones gameplans even yours.
It was an Upset win, but they all count the same
Well as DC, the INTs were part of MY gameplan.
But, the running game did fine. The 2.6 ypc includes all of the sacks, which were what really hurt us.
Originally posted by vabills
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Originally posted by vabills
Originally posted by kalkmanc
PPP with a big upset over Korb http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=212383
Who said it was an upset? Just because you guys can't evaluate talent doesn't mean it was an upset.
I said it was an upset. Impressive win, but definitely an upset. Korb gave that game away with all those turnovers.
Oh I see because you say it was an upset.
It was an upset. Your were expected to lose and yyou won, thats the definition of an upset.
Game actually went as predicted, your running game stuttered to a 2.6 ypc avg and your QB was sacked 9 times.
Only difference was Korb throwing 4 INTs and that is never part of anyones gameplans even yours.
It was an Upset win, but they all count the same
Well as DC, the INTs were part of MY gameplan.
But, the running game did fine. The 2.6 ypc includes all of the sacks, which were what really hurt us.
helluin
offline
offline
Originally posted by ArthurRiot
Any team that beats Korb performs an upset at this point in the season.
Congrats, and get the sand out of your vag.
Any team that beats Korb performs an upset at this point in the season.
Congrats, and get the sand out of your vag.
Originally posted by Koncorde
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Woodridge wins http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=212238
Bit annoyed with that one, see final 2 minutes of 2nd quarter for why.
Time-out? Anything? Please?
Ouch... but its a known bug, so most teams have taken to using a 2 min drill offense for both halves.
Originally posted by kalkmanc
Woodridge wins http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=212238
Bit annoyed with that one, see final 2 minutes of 2nd quarter for why.
Time-out? Anything? Please?
Ouch... but its a known bug, so most teams have taken to using a 2 min drill offense for both halves.
Originally posted by djhoffman99
Well as DC, the INTs were part of MY gameplan.
But, the running game did fine. The 2.6 ypc includes all of the sacks, which were what really hurt us.
I added the non sack avg in a second later, it was 4.5 or so, which is not great, and INTs are not designed no matter what anyone says, you just plan to make them a possibility never expecting 4 in one game.
Same thing happened to Monarchs today, we changed our defense in the 4th Qtr and it resulted in my LB getting a Pick 6 and a Fumble recovery return on back to back drives.
Unexpected 14 point swing, but the result of a minor tactical change.
I would never claim that as planned though
Well as DC, the INTs were part of MY gameplan.
But, the running game did fine. The 2.6 ypc includes all of the sacks, which were what really hurt us.
I added the non sack avg in a second later, it was 4.5 or so, which is not great, and INTs are not designed no matter what anyone says, you just plan to make them a possibility never expecting 4 in one game.
Same thing happened to Monarchs today, we changed our defense in the 4th Qtr and it resulted in my LB getting a Pick 6 and a Fumble recovery return on back to back drives.
Unexpected 14 point swing, but the result of a minor tactical change.
I would never claim that as planned though
djhoffman99
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mike Rogers
Originally posted by djhoffman99
Well as DC, the INTs were part of MY gameplan.
But, the running game did fine. The 2.6 ypc includes all of the sacks, which were what really hurt us.
I added the non sack avg in a second later, it was 4.5 or so, which is not great, and INTs are not designed no matter what anyone says, you just plan to make them a possibility never expecting 4 in one game.
Same thing happened to Monarchs today, we changed our defense in the 4th Qtr and it resulted in my LB getting a Pick 6 and a Fumble recovery return on back to back drives.
Unexpected 14 point swing, but the result of a minor tactical change.
I would never claim that as planned though
I don't agree. It's impossible in any game to "plan" for a specific number of anything, but you certainly set your team and individual tactics to create situations that result in sacks, fumbles, INTs, etc. That to me, is planning.
And while I agree 4.5 ypc isn't great, the point was 2.6 ypc doesn't accurately reflect how the running game did.
Originally posted by djhoffman99
Well as DC, the INTs were part of MY gameplan.
But, the running game did fine. The 2.6 ypc includes all of the sacks, which were what really hurt us.
I added the non sack avg in a second later, it was 4.5 or so, which is not great, and INTs are not designed no matter what anyone says, you just plan to make them a possibility never expecting 4 in one game.
Same thing happened to Monarchs today, we changed our defense in the 4th Qtr and it resulted in my LB getting a Pick 6 and a Fumble recovery return on back to back drives.
Unexpected 14 point swing, but the result of a minor tactical change.
I would never claim that as planned though
I don't agree. It's impossible in any game to "plan" for a specific number of anything, but you certainly set your team and individual tactics to create situations that result in sacks, fumbles, INTs, etc. That to me, is planning.
And while I agree 4.5 ypc isn't great, the point was 2.6 ypc doesn't accurately reflect how the running game did.
Last edited Nov 16, 2008 09:28:04
Disastermaster
offline
offline
Originally posted by djhoffman99
I don't agree. It's impossible in any game to "plan" for a specific number of anything, but you certainly set your team and individual tactics to create situations that result in sacks, fumbles, INTs, etc. That to me, is planning.
And while I agree 4.5 ypc isn't great, the point was 2.6 ypc doesn't accurately reflect how the running game did.
It is very easy to call an allout blitz almost every play, cause the short passing game is real bad. Donīt know if that has mutch to do with great gameplaning and setting tacticts. For me it is the same like running the strong I offtackle as you only running play. This things are killing the fun of the game for me.
This plays alone tells me how bad the AI is
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=212383&pbp_id=2812270
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=212383&pbp_id=2812610
right now it is easier to complete a pass for 10-15 yards than a short pass of 4-5 yards to a open WR.
But in the end, no one forced us to pass, we could have run all day but we made the decision and pay the price. You played a good game and deserved to win.
You canīt throw 4 interceptions and expect to win a game against a good team.
Maybe we should take the same approach like some other teams and use the same plays over and over and over again
I don't agree. It's impossible in any game to "plan" for a specific number of anything, but you certainly set your team and individual tactics to create situations that result in sacks, fumbles, INTs, etc. That to me, is planning.
And while I agree 4.5 ypc isn't great, the point was 2.6 ypc doesn't accurately reflect how the running game did.
It is very easy to call an allout blitz almost every play, cause the short passing game is real bad. Donīt know if that has mutch to do with great gameplaning and setting tacticts. For me it is the same like running the strong I offtackle as you only running play. This things are killing the fun of the game for me.
This plays alone tells me how bad the AI is
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=212383&pbp_id=2812270
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=212383&pbp_id=2812610
right now it is easier to complete a pass for 10-15 yards than a short pass of 4-5 yards to a open WR.
But in the end, no one forced us to pass, we could have run all day but we made the decision and pay the price. You played a good game and deserved to win.
You canīt throw 4 interceptions and expect to win a game against a good team.
Maybe we should take the same approach like some other teams and use the same plays over and over and over again
vabills
offline
offline
Originally posted by Disastermaster
Originally posted by djhoffman99
I don't agree. It's impossible in any game to "plan" for a specific number of anything, but you certainly set your team and individual tactics to create situations that result in sacks, fumbles, INTs, etc. That to me, is planning.
And while I agree 4.5 ypc isn't great, the point was 2.6 ypc doesn't accurately reflect how the running game did.
It is very easy to call an allout blitz almost every play, cause the short passing game is real bad. Donīt know if that has mutch to do with great gameplaning and setting tacticts. For me it is the same like running the strong I offtackle as you only running play. This things are killing the fun of the game for me.
This plays alone tells me how bad the AI is
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=212383&pbp_id=2812270
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=212383&pbp_id=2812610
right now it is easier to complete a pass for 10-15 yards than a short pass of 4-5 yards to a open WR.
But in the end, no one forced us to pass, we could have run all day but we made the decision and pay the price. You played a good game and deserved to win.
You canīt throw 4 interceptions and expect to win a game against a good team.
Maybe we should take the same approach like some other teams and use the same plays over and over and over again
Actually on both of those plays the QB was hurried immediately up the middle. I can't see your QB stats but with as bad as his rating is I suspect you have build issues (vision and pocket presence).
Originally posted by djhoffman99
I don't agree. It's impossible in any game to "plan" for a specific number of anything, but you certainly set your team and individual tactics to create situations that result in sacks, fumbles, INTs, etc. That to me, is planning.
And while I agree 4.5 ypc isn't great, the point was 2.6 ypc doesn't accurately reflect how the running game did.
It is very easy to call an allout blitz almost every play, cause the short passing game is real bad. Donīt know if that has mutch to do with great gameplaning and setting tacticts. For me it is the same like running the strong I offtackle as you only running play. This things are killing the fun of the game for me.
This plays alone tells me how bad the AI is
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=212383&pbp_id=2812270
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=212383&pbp_id=2812610
right now it is easier to complete a pass for 10-15 yards than a short pass of 4-5 yards to a open WR.
But in the end, no one forced us to pass, we could have run all day but we made the decision and pay the price. You played a good game and deserved to win.
You canīt throw 4 interceptions and expect to win a game against a good team.
Maybe we should take the same approach like some other teams and use the same plays over and over and over again
Actually on both of those plays the QB was hurried immediately up the middle. I can't see your QB stats but with as bad as his rating is I suspect you have build issues (vision and pocket presence).
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
