Originally posted by JcWildcat
to the top
aren't Mods supposed to be impartial? why bump this?
to the top
aren't Mods supposed to be impartial? why bump this?
Forum > Suggestions > Epic Suggestions > Give my dots a "Tactics Sharing Option" just like the "Attributes Sharing Option"
Originally posted by fogie55
Originally posted by JcWildcat
to the top
aren't Mods supposed to be impartial? why bump this?
maybe b/c I don't like linking threads that are locked in a lock message. People don't like that.
Just b/c I bump something to take the auto-unlock off does NOT mean I like the suggestion tbh.
I can't win for losing tonight I swear.
Originally posted by JcWildcat
to the top
aren't Mods supposed to be impartial? why bump this?
maybe b/c I don't like linking threads that are locked in a lock message. People don't like that.
Just b/c I bump something to take the auto-unlock off does NOT mean I like the suggestion tbh.
I can't win for losing tonight I swear.
Originally posted by JcWildcat
maybe b/c I don't like linking threads that are locked in a lock message. People don't like that.
Just b/c I bump something to take the auto-unlock off does NOT mean I like the suggestion tbh.
I can't win for losing tonight I swear.
: pats on back: (still no new smileys.
) There there... it's all good. And to answer the question, many Mods play and own teams. So why can't they support or make suggestions to improve the game? Works for me.
maybe b/c I don't like linking threads that are locked in a lock message. People don't like that.
Just b/c I bump something to take the auto-unlock off does NOT mean I like the suggestion tbh.
I can't win for losing tonight I swear.
: pats on back: (still no new smileys.
) There there... it's all good. And to answer the question, many Mods play and own teams. So why can't they support or make suggestions to improve the game? Works for me. fogie55
offline
offline
Originally posted by JcWildcat
maybe b/c I don't like linking threads that are locked in a lock message. People don't like that.
Just b/c I bump something to take the auto-unlock off does NOT mean I like the suggestion tbh.
I can't win for losing tonight I swear.
this whole concept needs to die... very, very bad for the game if this gets implemented
maybe b/c I don't like linking threads that are locked in a lock message. People don't like that.
Just b/c I bump something to take the auto-unlock off does NOT mean I like the suggestion tbh.
I can't win for losing tonight I swear.
this whole concept needs to die... very, very bad for the game if this gets implemented
Deathblade
offline
offline
Originally posted by JcWildcat
maybe b/c I don't like linking threads that are locked in a lock message. People don't like that.
Just b/c I bump something to take the auto-unlock off does NOT mean I like the suggestion tbh.
I can't win for losing tonight I swear.
Last post was 18 days ago...shouldn't have been locked.
maybe b/c I don't like linking threads that are locked in a lock message. People don't like that.
Just b/c I bump something to take the auto-unlock off does NOT mean I like the suggestion tbh.
I can't win for losing tonight I swear.
Last post was 18 days ago...shouldn't have been locked.
Edited by Deathblade on Nov 29, 2012 01:53:45
Originally posted by Deathblade
Originally posted by JcWildcat
maybe b/c I don't like linking threads that are locked in a lock message. People don't like that.
Just b/c I bump something to take the auto-unlock off does NOT mean I like the suggestion tbh.
I can't win for losing tonight I swear.
Last post was 18 days ago...shouldn't have been locked.
my apologies then, I was in a hurry and didn't want to chance linking a locked thread. That usually happens with the up for vote suggestions.
Originally posted by JcWildcat
maybe b/c I don't like linking threads that are locked in a lock message. People don't like that.
Just b/c I bump something to take the auto-unlock off does NOT mean I like the suggestion tbh.
I can't win for losing tonight I swear.
Last post was 18 days ago...shouldn't have been locked.
my apologies then, I was in a hurry and didn't want to chance linking a locked thread. That usually happens with the up for vote suggestions.whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by fogie55
this whole concept needs to die... very, very bad for the game if this gets implemented
this whole concept needs to die... very, very bad for the game if this gets implemented
sehorn31
offline
offline
There is nothing worse than seeing a CB go for the Pick when he said he was Set to Semi-Aggressive. What if it's the biggest Game of the Season and that CB really hadn't been Targeted until then. If you knew he was set that way, He would have never been in that spot to begin with. This just isn't fair to Coaches not to see what a Player's Tactics are Set to. It's my ass on the line when we lose and not to mention, It's not fair to the other Agents that are doing what the Coaches ask. 
Edited by sehorn31 on Nov 29, 2012 14:31:51
Myd
offline
offline
Originally posted by sehorn31
MAKE THIS HAPPEN IF YOU WANT TO KEEP MOST OF THE COACHES LEFT!!!
Nah.. just an overreaction..
MAKE THIS HAPPEN IF YOU WANT TO KEEP MOST OF THE COACHES LEFT!!!
Nah.. just an overreaction..
Originally posted by fogie55
this whole concept needs to die... very, very bad for the game if this gets implemented
Remember, Fogie... it's an "option" not a rule. I am with you if it's the rule. Nobody likes stuff forced down their throats like that. But, as an option, it should work extremely well. The ONLY issue I've even seen against the idea is the thought that team owners and coaches that have people that "won't share" will get angry and cut them. I say that already exists currently with those very same team owners and coaches that SWEAR up and down that people aren't setting their tactics per instructions. As for myself, I don;t always set my tactics exactly as ordered... but I always say so and give my tactics and the reasons why. If it becomes any kind of an issue, then I acquiesce to the demands. Usually I don't have to do that though.
this whole concept needs to die... very, very bad for the game if this gets implemented
Remember, Fogie... it's an "option" not a rule. I am with you if it's the rule. Nobody likes stuff forced down their throats like that. But, as an option, it should work extremely well. The ONLY issue I've even seen against the idea is the thought that team owners and coaches that have people that "won't share" will get angry and cut them. I say that already exists currently with those very same team owners and coaches that SWEAR up and down that people aren't setting their tactics per instructions. As for myself, I don;t always set my tactics exactly as ordered... but I always say so and give my tactics and the reasons why. If it becomes any kind of an issue, then I acquiesce to the demands. Usually I don't have to do that though.
Tampa E
offline
offline
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Remember, Fogie... it's an "option" not a rule. I am with you if it's the rule. Nobody likes stuff forced down their throats like that. But, as an option, it should work extremely well. The ONLY issue I've even seen against the idea is the thought that team owners and coaches that have people that "won't share" will get angry and cut them. I say that already exists currently with those very same team owners and coaches that SWEAR up and down that people aren't setting their tactics per instructions. As for myself, I don;t always set my tactics exactly as ordered... but I always say so and give my tactics and the reasons why. If it becomes any kind of an issue, then I acquiesce to the demands. Usually I don't have to do that though.
Exactly
Remember, Fogie... it's an "option" not a rule. I am with you if it's the rule. Nobody likes stuff forced down their throats like that. But, as an option, it should work extremely well. The ONLY issue I've even seen against the idea is the thought that team owners and coaches that have people that "won't share" will get angry and cut them. I say that already exists currently with those very same team owners and coaches that SWEAR up and down that people aren't setting their tactics per instructions. As for myself, I don;t always set my tactics exactly as ordered... but I always say so and give my tactics and the reasons why. If it becomes any kind of an issue, then I acquiesce to the demands. Usually I don't have to do that though.
Exactly
Edited by Tampa E on Nov 29, 2012 16:50:04
Deathblade
offline
offline
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Remember, Fogie... it's an "option" not a rule.
Nothing is an option when one side has all the power.
Remember, Fogie... it's an "option" not a rule.
Nothing is an option when one side has all the power.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
