Warrior General Games

Originally posted by djgomez33
Originally posted by jrry32

Originally posted by ryanbrock


Originally posted by raggman



Originally posted by ryanbrock




GG Chicago Glitchbitches.

Make sure you save some of those tears...you're gonna need them in 7 games when you get 50-70 runs straight up the gut from Csonka.

MEM is full of glitchbitches so we expect nothing less. Though, they probably won't run the same play every down like you douchebags.

Pot calling the kettle black.



Please explain

MEM has run the ball 350 times this season, Lincoln has run it 349 times. What exactly is MEM doing that makes them glitchbitches? Running the ball to Csonka who is averaging about 39 carries a game while Lincoln's power HB Green is averaging 30 carries per game...honestly, ryanbrock has no reason to be calling MEM glitchbitches, they mix up their runs but decide to run it with 1 main RB just like Lincoln does...Lincoln just happens to use it's secondary RBs more.

Originally posted by jktooley
Originally posted by djgomez33

Originally posted by The Duff Man


Wait.....is this still the GG thread?

Yeah, but it's pretty stupid when people run the same play over and over.

It's like playing someone in Madden with a fast QB and they run a 5-wide streaks route everytime just so you can run with your QB.

It's sad to see so called 'the best teams' or 'respected teams' stooping so low.

it is sad to see people stooping to Bort's standards.... I'll agree.

I'll go ahead and assume you are being sarcastic. I don't think everything that happens in this game is how Bort wants it to happen. I'll use the logic that I used above. I don't think the developers of Madden want someone to run a 5-wide Hail Mary every play to run of the DBs and run with the QB.

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by djgomez33

Originally posted by jrry32


Originally posted by ryanbrock



Originally posted by raggman




Originally posted by ryanbrock





GG Chicago Glitchbitches.

Make sure you save some of those tears...you're gonna need them in 7 games when you get 50-70 runs straight up the gut from Csonka.

MEM is full of glitchbitches so we expect nothing less. Though, they probably won't run the same play every down like you douchebags.

Pot calling the kettle black.



Please explain

MEM has run the ball 350 times this season, Lincoln has run it 349 times. What exactly is MEM doing that makes them glitchbitches? Running the ball to Csonka who is averaging about 39 carries a game while Lincoln's power HB Green is averaging 30 carries per game...honestly, ryanbrock has no reason to be calling MEM glitchbitches, they mix up their runs but decide to run it with 1 main RB just like Lincoln does...Lincoln just happens to use it's secondary RBs more.



Also to note is that Green carries it 30 times out of the 50 carries a game while Csonka is at 39 times out of the 50 BUT Lincoln's 2nd RB who carries it 12 times out of the 50 is also a powerful RB(averages 6 BTKs per 12 carries a game) so no player on Lincoln should really be talking that much trash about MEM overusing it's power HBs because thus far MEM's power HB has carried it 39 times out of 50 a game on average and Lincoln's 2 Power HBs have carried it 42 times a game out of 50 on average.

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by djgomez33

Originally posted by jrry32


Originally posted by ryanbrock



Originally posted by raggman




Originally posted by ryanbrock





GG Chicago Glitchbitches.

Make sure you save some of those tears...you're gonna need them in 7 games when you get 50-70 runs straight up the gut from Csonka.

MEM is full of glitchbitches so we expect nothing less. Though, they probably won't run the same play every down like you douchebags.

Pot calling the kettle black.



Please explain

MEM has run the ball 350 times this season, Lincoln has run it 349 times. What exactly is MEM doing that makes them glitchbitches? Running the ball to Csonka who is averaging about 39 carries a game while Lincoln's power HB Green is averaging 30 carries per game...honestly, ryanbrock has no reason to be calling MEM glitchbitches, they mix up their runs but decide to run it with 1 main RB just like Lincoln does...Lincoln just happens to use it's secondary RBs more.



I understand your point, to a point. The difference is that this game is supposed to (or at least I thought, maybe wrongly) take on realism. In reality it's not unusual for a HB that is the key part of an offense to take 25-30 carries/game. However, a back taking 66 carries in one game is completely unrealistic.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_holds_the_NFL_record_for_most_carries_in_a_game

PS I'm willing to discuss this, but if it turns into a pissing match...I'm done.

Originally posted by djgomez33
Originally posted by jrry32

Originally posted by djgomez33


Originally posted by jrry32



Originally posted by ryanbrock




Originally posted by raggman





Originally posted by ryanbrock






GG Chicago Glitchbitches.

Make sure you save some of those tears...you're gonna need them in 7 games when you get 50-70 runs straight up the gut from Csonka.

MEM is full of glitchbitches so we expect nothing less. Though, they probably won't run the same play every down like you douchebags.

Pot calling the kettle black.



Please explain

MEM has run the ball 350 times this season, Lincoln has run it 349 times. What exactly is MEM doing that makes them glitchbitches? Running the ball to Csonka who is averaging about 39 carries a game while Lincoln's power HB Green is averaging 30 carries per game...honestly, ryanbrock has no reason to be calling MEM glitchbitches, they mix up their runs but decide to run it with 1 main RB just like Lincoln does...Lincoln just happens to use it's secondary RBs more.



I understand your point, to a point. The difference is that this game is supposed to (or at least I thought, maybe wrongly) take on realism.

That's where the problem lies. Don't blame MEM(Not saying you, specifically) as glitchers and exploiters for something that bort set in place with his own code.

Agreed, I'd love nothing more than to be able to pass the ball, it makes the game MUCH more fun but right now, why pass it when rushing is so easy and passing is hard?(plus Short and medium routes suck because QBs can't lead WRs)

Originally posted by djgomez33
I understand your point, to a point. The difference is that this game is supposed to (or at least I thought, maybe wrongly) take on realism. In reality it's not unusual for a HB that is the key part of an offense to take 25-30 carries/game. However, a back taking 66 carries in one game is completely unrealistic.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_holds_the_NFL_record_for_most_carries_in_a_game

PS I'm willing to discuss this, but if it turns into a pissing match...I'm done.

I agree 66 carries is screwed up but isn't that the game's fault? There really should be a mechanic to keep that from happening. It's not MEM's job to make the game realistic...it's GLB's management's job.

OK, resume GG thread. Sorry for derailing it.

Originally posted by jfbueno
That's where the problem lies. Don't blame MEM(Not saying you, specifically) as glitchers and exploiters for something that bort set in place with his own code.

It may be a part of the game, but that doesn't mean you have to abuse it. There is a certain level of sportsmanship. I'm not complaining...rush him all you want, but don't say we can't blame you for doing it...because you have full control over it.

And BTW jason shock isn't really a power back...just because a HB breaks tackles doesn't mean they're a power back.

Originally posted by Sik Wit It
Originally posted by jfbueno

That's where the problem lies. Don't blame MEM(Not saying you, specifically) as glitchers and exploiters for something that bort set in place with his own code.

It may be a part of the game, but that doesn't mean you have to abuse it. There is a certain level of sportsmanship. I'm not complaining...rush him all you want, but don't say we can't blame you for doing it...because you have full control over it.

And BTW jason shock isn't really a power back...just because a HB breaks tackles doesn't mean they're a power back.

I said a Powerful RB...didn't say a Power RB.

Originally posted by Sik Wit It
Originally posted by jfbueno

That's where the problem lies. Don't blame MEM(Not saying you, specifically) as glitchers and exploiters for something that bort set in place with his own code.

It may be a part of the game, but that doesn't mean you have to abuse it. There is a certain level of sportsmanship. I'm not complaining...rush him all you want, but don't say we can't blame you for doing it...because you have full control over it.

And BTW jason shock isn't really a power back...just because a HB breaks tackles doesn't mean they're a power back.

If abusing it gets Bort to act on it faster...well...

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by Sik Wit It

Originally posted by jfbueno


That's where the problem lies. Don't blame MEM(Not saying you, specifically) as glitchers and exploiters for something that bort set in place with his own code.

It may be a part of the game, but that doesn't mean you have to abuse it. There is a certain level of sportsmanship. I'm not complaining...rush him all you want, but don't say we can't blame you for doing it...because you have full control over it.

And BTW jason shock isn't really a power back...just because a HB breaks tackles doesn't mean they're a power back.

If abusing it gets Bort to act on it faster...well...

I don't care if you abuse it, but please don't use this excuse.

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by Sik Wit It

Originally posted by jfbueno


That's where the problem lies. Don't blame MEM(Not saying you, specifically) as glitchers and exploiters for something that bort set in place with his own code.

It may be a part of the game, but that doesn't mean you have to abuse it. There is a certain level of sportsmanship. I'm not complaining...rush him all you want, but don't say we can't blame you for doing it...because you have full control over it.

And BTW jason shock isn't really a power back...just because a HB breaks tackles doesn't mean they're a power back.

If abusing it gets Bort to act on it faster...well...

I take it back, MEM isn't full of glitchbitches. They are a fraternity of Che Guevaras.

Originally posted by ryanbrock
Originally posted by jrry32

Originally posted by Sik Wit It


Originally posted by jfbueno



That's where the problem lies. Don't blame MEM(Not saying you, specifically) as glitchers and exploiters for something that bort set in place with his own code.

It may be a part of the game, but that doesn't mean you have to abuse it. There is a certain level of sportsmanship. I'm not complaining...rush him all you want, but don't say we can't blame you for doing it...because you have full control over it.

And BTW jason shock isn't really a power back...just because a HB breaks tackles doesn't mean they're a power back.

If abusing it gets Bort to act on it faster...well...

I take it back, MEM isn't full of glitchbitches. They are a fraternity of Che Guevaras.

You sure do love to throw names around. But anyways, I'll take that as a complement considering Guevara was a revolutionary overthrowing a hideous dictator, even though he was a marxist.

MEM = revolutionaries