Originally posted by chad13
See, this is why people hate USA Pro. The coaches have experienced getting beat in the playoffs by late boosters. The coaches try to share their experience. People get mad and say they don't make sense. USA Pro coaches get frustrated and give up on helping newer players because they are tired of hearing the same tired and stupid arguments over and over despite the fact that they've been through it and dealt with late boosting causing them a playoff game. USA Pro coaches say fuck it do whatever, dumbasses. Some people then consider USA Pro coaches/players/users to be douchebags.
I don't know any thing about people hating Pro league coaches. I do know that when I read a theory and the statistics supporting it and then see that an entire aspect of the game is left out in the calculations then I will question it's soundness. You guys can continue to be defensive about it and claim we're all dumb for not just accepting it as gospel but until I see the numbers (like a full season comparison between 2 players including game XP and playing time) then I will remain skeptical. The Legends were early boosters and we won our league to make it into the pro league. Not proof that early boosting is better though. Just a fact that is the complete opposite of your argument about late boosters winning in the playoffs.
See, this is why people hate USA Pro. The coaches have experienced getting beat in the playoffs by late boosters. The coaches try to share their experience. People get mad and say they don't make sense. USA Pro coaches get frustrated and give up on helping newer players because they are tired of hearing the same tired and stupid arguments over and over despite the fact that they've been through it and dealt with late boosting causing them a playoff game. USA Pro coaches say fuck it do whatever, dumbasses. Some people then consider USA Pro coaches/players/users to be douchebags.
I don't know any thing about people hating Pro league coaches. I do know that when I read a theory and the statistics supporting it and then see that an entire aspect of the game is left out in the calculations then I will question it's soundness. You guys can continue to be defensive about it and claim we're all dumb for not just accepting it as gospel but until I see the numbers (like a full season comparison between 2 players including game XP and playing time) then I will remain skeptical. The Legends were early boosters and we won our league to make it into the pro league. Not proof that early boosting is better though. Just a fact that is the complete opposite of your argument about late boosters winning in the playoffs.






























