Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by SteelersInsider

Again, this confirms everything I said:

I wanted to play last season for 1,200 flex, Hazy refused.

He wants to play this season for 1,200 flex, I refuse (at least until our roster is deep enough).


I lol'd at the part thinking you would have beaten his team. His team beat MEM by like 20 and the Beans lost to MEM by 59.


we lost to Benitos by 50 this season and won the season before

we beat Halifax and Halifax beat the Invaders and Benitos

Benitos beat the Evil Monkeys



Marblehead has beat the Beans like 4 in a row

Beans have beat Dryden 4 in a row

So by Jrry logic, then Marblehead should own Dryden, right? Oops


Some teams match-up better against others. The Gamblers weren't even expected to win anything in the playoffs. Don't act like now you knew that they were going to win.

The Beans weren't stuck in running 1 play last season. We would have done better than the 1 play Evil Monkeys on offense at least.

Originally posted by SteelersInsider
Marblehead has beat the Beans like 4 in a row

Beans have beat Dryden 4 in a row

So by Jrry logic, then Marblehead should own Dryden, right? Oops
Yup. If the Beans won by ~60.

I'm not going to get into strengths and weaknesses of each team, but let's just say that we don't match up well against certain teams (and certain teams don't match up well against us). We also start going for it on 4th down when we get behind at all, so instead of 10-14 point losses, we tend to lose by 50 if we are going to lose.

Originally posted by SteelersInsider


we lost to Benitos by 50 this season and won the season before



2 seasons ago we played in "friendly" where I told you ahead of time Santiago would be using the same tactics as its previous league game, you game planned, and won by 8.

This season we played in a tournament, I remembered you shouting to every forum about your huge win in the past, and I game planned and we won by 67

Originally posted by SteelersInsider
Originally posted by jrry32

Originally posted by SteelersInsider


Again, this confirms everything I said:

I wanted to play last season for 1,200 flex, Hazy refused.

He wants to play this season for 1,200 flex, I refuse (at least until our roster is deep enough).


I lol'd at the part thinking you would have beaten his team. His team beat MEM by like 20 and the Beans lost to MEM by 59.


we lost to Benitos by 50 this season and won the season before

we beat Halifax and Halifax beat the Invaders and Benitos

Benitos beat the Evil Monkeys



Marblehead has beat the Beans like 4 in a row

Beans have beat Dryden 4 in a row

So by Jrry logic, then Marblehead should own Dryden, right? Oops


Some teams match-up better against others. The Gamblers weren't even expected to win anything in the playoffs. Don't act like now you knew that they were going to win.

The Beans weren't stuck in running 1 play last season. We would have done better than the 1 play Evil Monkeys on offense at least.




So if you would have done better than the 1 play MEM team, why didn't you beat the 1 play MEM team(or at least slow down the offense)? Why did you lose 73-14? Sounds like to me, we are both assuming things but my assumptions are a little better based than yours. Heck, Hazy's team could destroy you with the Strong I last season and they had the unstoppable QB runs. If the Beans couldn't stop the Monkeys 1 play offense, I doubt they could stop the Gamblers. Thus why if I were in your shoes, I wouldn't refuse to play someone and then use the excuse you could beat them last year when you know in all honesty that's an assumption and a likely untrue assumption.

Originally posted by Havoc
Originally posted by SteelersInsider



we lost to Benitos by 50 this season and won the season before



2 seasons ago we played in "friendly" where I told you ahead of time Santiago would be using the same tactics as its previous league game, you game planned, and won by 8.

This season we played in a tournament, I remembered you shouting to every forum about your huge win in the past, and I game planned and we won by 67



QFT

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by SteelersInsider

Originally posted by jrry32


Originally posted by SteelersInsider



Again, this confirms everything I said:

I wanted to play last season for 1,200 flex, Hazy refused.

He wants to play this season for 1,200 flex, I refuse (at least until our roster is deep enough).


I lol'd at the part thinking you would have beaten his team. His team beat MEM by like 20 and the Beans lost to MEM by 59.


we lost to Benitos by 50 this season and won the season before

we beat Halifax and Halifax beat the Invaders and Benitos

Benitos beat the Evil Monkeys



Marblehead has beat the Beans like 4 in a row

Beans have beat Dryden 4 in a row

So by Jrry logic, then Marblehead should own Dryden, right? Oops


Some teams match-up better against others. The Gamblers weren't even expected to win anything in the playoffs. Don't act like now you knew that they were going to win.

The Beans weren't stuck in running 1 play last season. We would have done better than the 1 play Evil Monkeys on offense at least.




So if you would have done better than the 1 play MEM team, why didn't you beat the 1 play MEM team(or at least slow down the offense)? Why did you lose 73-14? Sounds like to me, we are both assuming things but my assumptions are a little better based than yours. Heck, Hazy's team could destroy you with the Strong I last season and they had the unstoppable QB runs. If the Beans couldn't stop the Monkeys 1 play offense, I doubt they could stop the Gamblers. Thus why if I were in your shoes, I wouldn't refuse to play someone and then use the excuse you could beat them last year when you know in all honesty that's an assumption and a likely untrue assumption.



13/17, 283.5yds, 4 TD, 0 Int

Pretty big line for a QB in a 1 play offense iyam.

Originally posted by Havoc
Originally posted by SteelersInsider



we lost to Benitos by 50 this season and won the season before



2 seasons ago we played in "friendly" where I told you ahead of time Santiago would be using the same tactics as its previous league game, you game planned, and won by 8.

This season we played in a tournament, I remembered you shouting to every forum about your huge win in the past, and I game planned and we won by 67





Actually, go check the AI from the game before the Benitos game where we won - it was 99.5% the same. I *TOLD* you that we were going to gameplan and than I was going to talk smack if we won, but I never got around to it. I looked at a couple games, but just pissed around and didn't end up bothering to change anything til just before the game and it was minor shit like moving 1 or 2 plays from 5% to 10%. Nothing that affected the outcome.

I didn't gameplan for this season either. The only change was that I had a brand new DC who had never even seen our builds put in 100 new defenses and they didn't match to our personnel at all. Nice job beating never used AI/DC before.

If you want a rematch again me and *my* AI/tactics, you know where to reach me.


And this time, let me mess around on the test server for a month and test out all the best builds and defenses..... then we'll see what happens in an even match.

Originally posted by jrry32


So if you would have done better than the 1 play MEM team, why didn't you beat the 1 play MEM team(or at least slow down the offense)? Why did you lose 73-14? Sounds like to me, we are both assuming things but my assumptions are a little better based than yours. Heck, Hazy's team could destroy you with the Strong I last season and they had the unstoppable QB runs. If the Beans couldn't stop the Monkeys 1 play offense, I doubt they could stop the Gamblers. Thus why if I were in your shoes, I wouldn't refuse to play someone and then use the excuse you could beat them last year when you know in all honesty that's an assumption and a likely untrue assumption.



I think you forget who has the best running QB in the game. We own the QB run plays, not Hazy imo.

I'm not refusing to play him, I'm just refusing to play for money. I won't play for money unless I think I have a 60% chance of winning or better. I don't think we have that on the Gamblers. In fact, because of their roster size, it is probably only a 40% chance of us winning.

Originally posted by SteelersInsider
Actually, go check the AI from the game before the Benitos game where we won - it was 99.5% the same. I *TOLD* you that we were going to gameplan and than I was going to talk smack if we won, but I never got around to it. I looked at a couple games, but just pissed around and didn't end up bothering to change anything til just before the game and it was minor shit like moving 1 or 2 plays from 5% to 10%. Nothing that affected the outcome.

I didn't gameplan for this season either. The only change was that I had a brand new DC who had never even seen our builds put in 100 new defenses and they didn't match to our personnel at all. Nice job beating never used AI/DC before.

If you want a rematch again me and *my* AI/tactics, you know where to reach me.


And this time, let me mess around on the test server for a month and test out all the best builds and defenses..... then we'll see what happens in an even match.

[ ]explains getting beat by 9258793857

Its always something other than hes just not cut out for dotball.

Originally posted by SteelersInsider
Originally posted by jrry32



So if you would have done better than the 1 play MEM team, why didn't you beat the 1 play MEM team(or at least slow down the offense)? Why did you lose 73-14? Sounds like to me, we are both assuming things but my assumptions are a little better based than yours. Heck, Hazy's team could destroy you with the Strong I last season and they had the unstoppable QB runs. If the Beans couldn't stop the Monkeys 1 play offense, I doubt they could stop the Gamblers. Thus why if I were in your shoes, I wouldn't refuse to play someone and then use the excuse you could beat them last year when you know in all honesty that's an assumption and a likely untrue assumption.



I think you forget who has the best running QB in the game. We own the QB run plays, not Hazy imo.

I'm not refusing to play him, I'm just refusing to play for money. I won't play for money unless I think I have a 60% chance of winning or better. I don't think we have that on the Gamblers. In fact, because of their roster size, it is probably only a 40% chance of us winning.



I think you forget who is the better OC and the smarter playcaller.(hint: Hazy)

Originally posted by SteelersInsider


If you want a rematch again me and *my* AI/tactics, you know where to reach me.



I give you points for spirit. You went 0-3 in the tournament and lost to Santiago by 60+, and yet you are still calling me out.

Merely a flesh wound!