Warrior General Games

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
jktooley, thx for the words and understanding of the situation.

Galk, no hard feelings, it happens. Your still ok in my book.

Ryan, you are out of line and flat out incorrect in your stance, but please stop derailing this thread with your bullshit. Feel free to make another thread if you want to wine all day and call teams out, while sounding like a hypocritical idiot.

P.S. Wise, MM Pass Offense > Chicago Pass offense

GG Red Dots!

We have got some of the worst luck I have seen in a long time though.

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN

jktooley, thx for the words and understanding of the situation.

Galk, no hard feelings, it happens. Your still ok in my book.

Ryan, you are out of line and flat out incorrect in your stance, but please stop derailing this thread with your bullshit. Feel free to make another thread if you want to wine all day and call teams out, while sounding like a hypocritical idiot.

P.S. Wise, MM Pass Offense > Chicago Pass offense

Shh, don't tell others about our super secret awesome Passing Offense.

Also, I know I helped derail this thread a bit but lets do what Wiseman said and stop bickering in here. There are plenty of other threads for that .

Originally posted by Galkuris
Originally posted by jrry32

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN


jktooley, thx for the words and understanding of the situation.

Galk, no hard feelings, it happens. Your still ok in my book.

Ryan, you are out of line and flat out incorrect in your stance, but please stop derailing this thread with your bullshit. Feel free to make another thread if you want to wine all day and call teams out, while sounding like a hypocritical idiot.

P.S. Wise, MM Pass Offense > Chicago Pass offense

Shh, don't tell others about our super secret awesome Passing Offense.

Also, I know I helped derail this thread a bit but lets do what Wiseman said and stop bickering in here. There are plenty of other threads for that .

What? Don't tell them the key to passing is putting your kicker in at WR and throwing to him every play because he kicks ass(literally)...d'oh!

Originally posted by ryanbrock
I never said you condoned it, I was saying that you employed it. It's a bitch move and you deserve to be called out on it.

No offense bro, but your pussy is stinking up the joint.

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by Galkuris

Originally posted by jrry32


Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN



jktooley, thx for the words and understanding of the situation.

Galk, no hard feelings, it happens. Your still ok in my book.

Ryan, you are out of line and flat out incorrect in your stance, but please stop derailing this thread with your bullshit. Feel free to make another thread if you want to wine all day and call teams out, while sounding like a hypocritical idiot.

P.S. Wise, MM Pass Offense > Chicago Pass offense

Shh, don't tell others about our super secret awesome Passing Offense.

Also, I know I helped derail this thread a bit but lets do what Wiseman said and stop bickering in here. There are plenty of other threads for that .

What? Don't tell them the key to passing is putting your kicker in at WR and throwing to him every play because he kicks ass(literally)...d'oh!



Phew, you can tell them that part, just don't mention the part where you put the punter at RT....doh.

Originally posted by jktooley
Really, to be fair, Lincoln ran 31 slam/offtackles from a combo of Ace/Strong I/I-Form out of 41 total rushes... So I wouldn't take TOO much of the high road here. You guys mixed it up a bit more, but the same principle was in place.

Just for fun, go look at damned near every game in GLB Pro this week, and I'm sure you'll see similar results, and will continue to see them until Bort gets back from Bali and adjusts the sim.

Take the win, be happy about it, and leave it at that. Otherwise, you just come off looking like a cock.

We also ran from the Weak I formation. We ran out of every available formation except SG (3 & 5 WR) and Pro-Set. Clearly we're running a cheese offense. The same sort of cheese offense we've run in Lincoln since we could select our own playcalls.

As usual, we sprinkle in a few pitches to keep defenses honest but that's never been the core of our offensive system. Suggesting that our offense is cheese is just ridiculous. Many legitimate teams run the ball around 60% split .. that's always been about where we're at as well.

Qtr 1-3: Lincoln run/pass split 26/23
Qtr 4: Lincoln run/pass split 15/3 (does not include one kneel down at the end of the game). 12 of Greene's carries also came in the 4th quarter.

In other words, it looks to me that we run a relatively balanced offense and when we take an 11-point lead into the 4th quarter, we run the ball ALOT. Highly unrealistic....

Originally posted by ryanbrock
Originally posted by jktooley

Originally posted by ryanbrock


Originally posted by jktooley



Really, to be fair, Lincoln ran 31 slam/offtackles from a combo of Ace/Strong I/I-Form out of 41 total rushes... So I wouldn't take TOO much of the high road here. You guys mixed it up a bit more, but the same principle was in place.

The same principle was not in place. They were trying to exploit ONE defense. The Hedgehogs gameplanned so they would run the Strong I offtackle the whole game. Lincoln doesn't play that shit.


The exploit isn't one certain formation, though Strong I gives you the best opportunity usually, but rather the inside running game with a powerback. To whit, with the running attack that you employed, the same philosophy is in place, whether it's from one singular formation, or a combination of others.

No, it's not. The issue here is trying to run the same play against the same defense the entire game.



Oh..... now I get it... This is your way of trying to get people to NOT use this gameplan in the future before playing against teams that will use it, and put a L on your record right?

If you're this butthurt about it following a win, can't wait until you face a team like Washington or MEM that can do it and get the win...

I'll make sure I wrap my monitor in saran wrap so your tears don't hit my keyboard.

Originally posted by jktooley
Originally posted by ryanbrock

Originally posted by jktooley


Originally posted by ryanbrock



Originally posted by jktooley




Really, to be fair, Lincoln ran 31 slam/offtackles from a combo of Ace/Strong I/I-Form out of 41 total rushes... So I wouldn't take TOO much of the high road here. You guys mixed it up a bit more, but the same principle was in place.

The same principle was not in place. They were trying to exploit ONE defense. The Hedgehogs gameplanned so they would run the Strong I offtackle the whole game. Lincoln doesn't play that shit.


The exploit isn't one certain formation, though Strong I gives you the best opportunity usually, but rather the inside running game with a powerback. To whit, with the running attack that you employed, the same philosophy is in place, whether it's from one singular formation, or a combination of others.

No, it's not. The issue here is trying to run the same play against the same defense the entire game.



Oh..... now I get it... This is your way of trying to get people to NOT use this gameplan in the future before playing against teams that will use it, and put a L on your record right?

If you're this butthurt about it following a win, can't wait until you face a team like Washington or MEM that can do it and get the win...

I'll make sure I wrap my monitor in saran wrap so your tears don't hit my keyboard.

lolodotears

Unfortunately the best way to deal with the broken running game is for us all to use it until Bort gets bored to tears and realizes why he needs to fix it sooner rather than later.

Originally posted by jktooley
Originally posted by ryanbrock

Originally posted by jktooley


Originally posted by ryanbrock



Originally posted by jktooley




Really, to be fair, Lincoln ran 31 slam/offtackles from a combo of Ace/Strong I/I-Form out of 41 total rushes... So I wouldn't take TOO much of the high road here. You guys mixed it up a bit more, but the same principle was in place.

The same principle was not in place. They were trying to exploit ONE defense. The Hedgehogs gameplanned so they would run the Strong I offtackle the whole game. Lincoln doesn't play that shit.


The exploit isn't one certain formation, though Strong I gives you the best opportunity usually, but rather the inside running game with a powerback. To whit, with the running attack that you employed, the same philosophy is in place, whether it's from one singular formation, or a combination of others.

No, it's not. The issue here is trying to run the same play against the same defense the entire game.



Oh..... now I get it... This is your way of trying to get people to NOT use this gameplan in the future before playing against teams that will use it, and put a L on your record right?

If you're this butthurt about it following a win, can't wait until you face a team like Washington or MEM that can do it and get the win...

I'll make sure I wrap my monitor in saran wrap so your tears don't hit my keyboard.

Use those kind of tactics all you want. Just know I'll be calling your team a bunch of bitchfaces after the game, win or lose.

Originally posted by Hukton Vioxx
Unfortunately the best way to deal with the broken running game is for us all to use it until Bort gets bored to tears and realizes why he needs to fix it sooner rather than later.

It's being worked on...

I've got the Bort's current projects script, and I would say changes should be in effect soon.

But congrats to Chicago for using the only kind of gameplan that could feasibly work against the retarded good defense of Lincoln.

I just search through some logs in my Bort's keylogger script, and I found nothing about it.