Warrior General Games

As requested, politely, by some users I've upgraded the AI Enhancer script. It now supports cookies. Install at http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/38237

Remember to uninstall.

Originally posted by rockitsauce
As requested, politely, by some users I've upgraded the AI Enhancer script. It now supports cookies. Install at http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/38237

Remember to uninstall.

the jquery is interesting, I just went with the GM_setValue() commands for storing data

Originally posted by rockitsauce
As requested, politely, by some users I've upgraded the AI Enhancer script. It now supports cookies. Install at http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/38237

Remember to uninstall.

rockitsauce, the new version does not show you the added % of output anymore. Is that a bug?

Edit: Also still no "Show Only Input" Var on load?
Thanks for this script by the way.

Edit2: show_on_load: true, function does not work anymore.

I asked this previously but it may have gotten lost in the shuffle. On the PBP, is there anyway to highlight just the player's name as opposed to the entire line? I had an older script that did this but the new updated one does the entire line. Thanks in advance!

I was just looking through the Game Scout script and came across this line...

else console.log("DH: fuckup?");

What game stat is that???

Originally posted by Second Goalie
I was just looking through the Game Scout script and came across this line...

else console.log("DH: fuckup?");

What game stat is that???

lol.....That is when it detects a berf.

Originally posted by mw54finest
Originally posted by rockitsauce

As requested, politely, by some users I've upgraded the AI Enhancer script. It now supports cookies. Install at http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/38237

Remember to uninstall.

rockitsauce, the new version does not show you the added % of output anymore. Is that a bug?

Edit: Also still no "Show Only Input" Var on load?
Thanks for this script by the way.

Edit2: show_on_load: true, function does not work anymore.

OK, I'll take a look at those tonight. I got rushed yesterday and didn't test thoroughly. And I understand that you are now asking for show on load by specific type. Got it.

Originally posted by Dantae
Originally posted by rockitsauce

As requested, politely, by some users I've upgraded the AI Enhancer script. It now supports cookies. Install at http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/38237

Remember to uninstall.

the jquery is interesting, I just went with the GM_setValue() commands for storing data

That only sets a value in greasemonkey (viewable in your about:config). In doing so you lose the power of the cookies, such as expiration, path and domain.

rockitsauce,
What I mean by "Show Only Input" is have a var that will expand on load, but only show that input as expanded, like when you click on [+] Show Input for the first time. Right now, it shows all input and outputs when loaded with current var to "true". For now, I went back to the previous version.

Originally posted by mw54finest
Originally posted by rockitsauce

As requested, politely, by some users I've upgraded the AI Enhancer script. It now supports cookies. Install at http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/38237

Remember to uninstall.

rockitsauce, the new version does not show you the added % of output anymore. Is that a bug?

Edit: Also still no "Show Only Input" Var on load?
Thanks for this script by the way.

Edit2: show_on_load: true, function does not work anymore.

Got the issues fixed. Grab the new version.

There were other issues too.

Originally posted by mw54finest
rockitsauce,
What I mean by "Show Only Input" is have a var that will expand on load, but only show that input as expanded, like when you click on [+] Show Input for the first time. Right now, it shows all input and outputs when loaded with current var to "true". For now, I went back to the previous version.

Gotcha. I'll do that soon.

Originally posted by rockitsauce

In the real world, I suffer the ignorant. In fantasy worlds I tend to leave them to their own devices.

To date you're the only person who can't figure out how to use it. Those that have approached me without lines such as "the script is totally useless" have received responses they appreciate. Am I defensive? No. Once again, ignorant fools left to their own devices.

And.... scene
haha nice attempt to turn this around on me, but that aint gonna happen

bottom line: you were a douche

i asked you specific questions and instead of giving me the answer you acted like a typical geek and played games. youre sitting right there, able to help, and instead you wasted my time trying to be cute. why the hell wouldnt you just answer the very specific questions? if thats the way you or anybody else on here is going to operate then im going to call you on it every time

as ive said before on these forums, i spent over a decade as a C/C++ programmer and UNIX administrator so i have extensive background in software engineering. ive supported hundreds of thousands of users who worked with my software. theres a way to handle these situations properly. your approach is exactly the wrong way and he should learn not to be a douche

i said the script was 'useless' because i was defining how it wasnt functioning properly. i wasnt making a judgment to the quality of the work and any reasonable person could look at the context of that word and tell exactly what i was saying. but your geek hypersensitivity turned that into some kind of challenge to your masculinity or something in your own mind. thats your problem not mine

i would not have asked the questions nor provided such detail if i wasnt pretty sure it wasnt operating properly. i cant see what others screens look like, you provided zero documentation, so my only option is to clearly describe what was happening and get assistance from people who know how its supposed to work. i wasnt rude, i wasnt judgmental, all i did was describe what was happening to me hoping somebody could describe how its supposed to work

and who would know best how its supposed to work? you! all you had to do was read what i wrote and say 'oh yeah its supposed to do x, y, z when you click buttons a, b & c. but you didnt want to do that. instead you took some ridiculous offense and played games, wasting my time, and rightfully pissing me off. the response you got from me after that you deserved

next time, just answer the questions. and dont read something in where it doesnt exist. holy cow

Originally posted by meathead013
Originally posted by rockitsauce


In the real world, I suffer the ignorant. In fantasy worlds I tend to leave them to their own devices.

To date you're the only person who can't figure out how to use it. Those that have approached me without lines such as "the script is totally useless" have received responses they appreciate. Am I defensive? No. Once again, ignorant fools left to their own devices.

And.... scene
haha nice attempt to turn this around on me, but that aint gonna happen

bottom line: you were a douche

i asked you specific questions and instead of giving me the answer you acted like a typical geek and played games. youre sitting right there, able to help, and instead you wasted my time trying to be cute. why the hell wouldnt you just answer the very specific questions? if thats the way you or anybody else on here is going to operate then im going to call you on it every time

as ive said before on these forums, i spent over a decade as a C/C++ programmer and UNIX administrator so i have extensive background in software engineering. ive supported hundreds of thousands of users who worked with my software. theres a way to handle these situations properly. your approach is exactly the wrong way and he should learn not to be a douche

i said the script was 'useless' because i was defining how it wasnt functioning properly. i wasnt making a judgment to the quality of the work and any reasonable person could look at the context of that word and tell exactly what i was saying. but your geek hypersensitivity turned that into some kind of challenge to your masculinity or something in your own mind. thats your problem not mine

i would not have asked the questions nor provided such detail if i wasnt pretty sure it wasnt operating properly. i cant see what others screens look like, you provided zero documentation, so my only option is to clearly describe what was happening and get assistance from people who know how its supposed to work. i wasnt rude, i wasnt judgmental, all i did was describe what was happening to me hoping somebody could describe how its supposed to work

and who would know best how its supposed to work? you! all you had to do was read what i wrote and say 'oh yeah its supposed to do x, y, z when you click buttons a, b & c. but you didnt want to do that. instead you took some ridiculous offense and played games, wasting my time, and rightfully pissing me off. the response you got from me after that you deserved

next time, just answer the questions. and dont read something in where it doesnt exist. holy cow

Please go away. Choose not to use my scripts.

Originally posted by rockitsauce
Originally posted by mw54finest

rockitsauce,
What I mean by "Show Only Input" is have a var that will expand on load, but only show that input as expanded, like when you click on [+] Show Input for the first time. Right now, it shows all input and outputs when loaded with current var to "true". For now, I went back to the previous version.

Gotcha. I'll do that soon.

New update contains this ability. Variable names are evident.

I won't be visiting this forum thread anymore, so if you have questions or requests contact me privately or in the private Greasemonkey forum. Thank you.

Originally posted by rockitsauce


Please go away. Choose not to use my scripts.

from what I read it appears that you jumped pretty quickly to telling him to uninstall it without providing any help. I agree that script writers work for free and benefits everyone, but your people skills suck.