Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Octowned
Yeah, a per season cap is a good idea.

And can't anybody make a multi and let them get over 400 FP based on the seasonal bonuses? Plenty of people have multis with 2000+ flex by now without spending a dime, trust me... Though I guess the 400 rule does limit people from creating a player, signing them, and instantly depositing, but it doesn't stop somebody from creating a player today and using them NEXT season.

Maybe the depositors need to have a player on the team, and one in the "suggested level range" for the league, or something similar. So a Pro team can't sign a level 5 ringer.

Or maybe I'm just being absurd, but I try to look at things from a business perspective.

(Speaking of business perspective, I sent you something via. the support channel a few weeks ago, really wanted to get in touch.. in case you never saw that come through.)

technically you can't sign a level 5 player to a pro team.

but i think the bolded part will solve the multi issue here, at least most of the way.

Originally posted by Bort
Random idea (might work better) since it's only for friendlies:

Instead of "depositing" fp into the bank, make it so you can add your name to a list of users who pay for friendlies, and when one is accepted it takes the 25 points split evenly from everyone on the list, rounded so the owner pays the extra 1 or 2 when you can't split evenly.

That way, you'd avoid any issues with "what if the owner sells the team."

Also make it so it can only be used by users who have earned more than 400 FP in their lifetime. Gets rid of the multi problem immediately.

sorry for not posting in this thread in a while, completely forgot about it. but i love the idea and additions, hopefully it will all be added soon

Ryan

Originally posted by Bort
Random idea (might work better) since it's only for friendlies:

Instead of "depositing" fp into the bank, make it so you can add your name to a list of users who pay for friendlies, and when one is accepted it takes the 25 points split evenly from everyone on the list, rounded so the owner pays the extra 1 or 2 when you can't split evenly.

That way, you'd avoid any issues with "what if the owner sells the team."

Also make it so it can only be used by users who have earned more than 400 FP in their lifetime. Gets rid of the multi problem immediately.

By earn, would you also include purchasing flex? Also, what about new agents who have not spent money on the game, but have extra flex they may want to donate to the peewee team they have signed to? (Not that this is likely to happen though).

This is a good idea. Would this 'list' only be viewable to the team owner (possibly co-owner), including how much flex each user has donated? Also, will people be forced to donate by multiples of 25, or can they just drop the extra 10 flex they may have?

Originally posted by Vitamin Water
Originally posted by Bort

Random idea (might work better) since it's only for friendlies:

Instead of "depositing" fp into the bank, make it so you can add your name to a list of users who pay for friendlies, and when one is accepted it takes the 25 points split evenly from everyone on the list, rounded so the owner pays the extra 1 or 2 when you can't split evenly.

That way, you'd avoid any issues with "what if the owner sells the team."

Also make it so it can only be used by users who have earned more than 400 FP in their lifetime. Gets rid of the multi problem immediately.

By earn, would you also include purchasing flex? Also, what about new agents who have not spent money on the game, but have extra flex they may want to donate to the peewee team they have signed to? (Not that this is likely to happen though).

This is a good idea. Would this 'list' only be viewable to the team owner (possibly co-owner), including how much flex each user has donated? Also, will people be forced to donate by multiples of 25, or can they just drop the extra 10 flex they may have?

You bring you up interesting point in this. When you ask Bort "by earned do you mean purchase?" because you'd have to. Bort, I want to mention, that you generously give out 100 FP here 200 FP there, from time to time. Is it possible to keep THOSE FP out of the equation or, have a # that would be so drastically above the original 400 and/or what you give out on special occasions that it would INDICATE a booster.

Originally posted by Jack Riley
Originally posted by Vitamin Water

Originally posted by Bort


Random idea (might work better) since it's only for friendlies:

Instead of "depositing" fp into the bank, make it so you can add your name to a list of users who pay for friendlies, and when one is accepted it takes the 25 points split evenly from everyone on the list, rounded so the owner pays the extra 1 or 2 when you can't split evenly.

That way, you'd avoid any issues with "what if the owner sells the team."

Also make it so it can only be used by users who have earned more than 400 FP in their lifetime. Gets rid of the multi problem immediately.

By earn, would you also include purchasing flex? Also, what about new agents who have not spent money on the game, but have extra flex they may want to donate to the peewee team they have signed to? (Not that this is likely to happen though).

This is a good idea. Would this 'list' only be viewable to the team owner (possibly co-owner), including how much flex each user has donated? Also, will people be forced to donate by multiples of 25, or can they just drop the extra 10 flex they may have?

You bring you up interesting point in this. When you ask Bort "by earned do you mean purchase?" because you'd have to. Bort, I want to mention, that you generously give out 100 FP here 200 FP there, from time to time. Is it possible to keep THOSE FP out of the equation or, have a # that would be so drastically above the original 400 and/or what you give out on special occasions that it would INDICATE a booster.

very good points indeed. yes, I would allow people to use the 100 bort generously hands out, only if they have purchased flex in their life time (maybe they also have to be over a certain amount of flex to donate too)

Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
very good points indeed. yes, I would allow people to use the 100 bort generously hands out, only if they have purchased flex in their life time (maybe they also have to be over a certain amount of flex to donate too)

That's a good idea. I wast thinking something along those lines as well.

Why not just say player may donate flex, but may not donate to the point where they would have less then 400 flex points (or whatever the start-up is now). This would also rule out multis, and we would not have to worry about whether they purchased flex or not.

That is pretty much in common with what me and bort are saying, as long as something gets added, i really wont mind what the restrictions are on how much you have to have are.

Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
That is pretty much in common with what me and bort are saying, as long as something gets added, i really wont mind what the restrictions are on how much you have to have are.

These are just additional ideas to avoid exploits, but I agree.

End of season 13 bump

Epic!+1

i like it +1

Originally posted by ryan_grant-25
End of season 13 bump

I was thinking about that too

+1

So, what are the conflicting problems on this one right now?