I haven't experience any problems loading plays. In fact when watching an entire game, each play loads very quickly (maybe quicker than the current game.)
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Goal Line Blitz 2 - Alpha Testing Information - Q&A
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by DiMo28
I haven't experience any problems loading plays. In fact when watching an entire game, each play loads very quickly (maybe quicker than the current game.)
My mileage may vary then, I guess.
Anyone else?
(Guess I'll just have to wait for the dot-replay option in the meantime.)
I haven't experience any problems loading plays. In fact when watching an entire game, each play loads very quickly (maybe quicker than the current game.)
My mileage may vary then, I guess.
Anyone else?
(Guess I'll just have to wait for the dot-replay option in the meantime.)
Originally posted by JcWildcat
I'm a tester, but today is my first "real" day of attempting to figure it all out.
Oh look...another one of the same people they choose for everything. Someone that hasn't a clue.
I'm a tester, but today is my first "real" day of attempting to figure it all out.
Oh look...another one of the same people they choose for everything. Someone that hasn't a clue.
DiMo28
offline
offline
Originally posted by Magic Mike
Oh look...another one of the same people they choose for everything. Someone that hasn't a clue.
Not all of the testers are posting here and insulting people isn't going to make them want to post in here. Talk about get a clue.
I'm appreciating all the info given by the testers so far. Thanks!
Oh look...another one of the same people they choose for everything. Someone that hasn't a clue.
Not all of the testers are posting here and insulting people isn't going to make them want to post in here. Talk about get a clue.
I'm appreciating all the info given by the testers so far. Thanks!
TJ Spikes
offline
offline
Originally posted by DiMo28
Originally posted by gbororats
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/58/9405
but i dont see what difference it makes a punt or a Kick
It would be nice to have free kicks, but a kickoff is more like a free kick than a punt is so it shouldn't be changed. At least it is from the 20-yard line in this replay. I'm sure it's been noted that the ball is missing on the field and that some of them are offside when the ball is kicked.
that looks like a punt to me. that's why the ball is missing IMO
Originally posted by gbororats
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/58/9405
but i dont see what difference it makes a punt or a Kick
It would be nice to have free kicks, but a kickoff is more like a free kick than a punt is so it shouldn't be changed. At least it is from the 20-yard line in this replay. I'm sure it's been noted that the ball is missing on the field and that some of them are offside when the ball is kicked.
that looks like a punt to me. that's why the ball is missing IMO
So will holding be allowed in the new game? Top of screen WR holding the crap out of the CB
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/58/9414
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/58/9414
Edited by DONKEIDIC on Sep 22, 2013 12:18:19
DiMo28
offline
offline
Originally posted by TJ Spikes
that looks like a punt to me. that's why the ball is missing IMO
You're right. How cool! Nice job, Bort.
that looks like a punt to me. that's why the ball is missing IMO
You're right. How cool! Nice job, Bort.
AlaskanRaven
offline
offline
Originally posted by Novus
I have an OLD computer... like 9 years old. I'm not kidding. As such, when I try to watch replays on here, it locks my computer up hopelessly. Just can't do it.
BUT... before anyone tells me to just get a new computer, I was able to get on a much newer computer yesterday (less than a year old) to watch some replays... and while the replays load, they are still a bit slow to load.
I'm wondering... is anyone else thinking that maybe the code for the replays needs to be optimized a bit, to cut down on load times for replays? If a computer less than a year old is having a little bit of trouble loading replays, that tells me the coding isn't as efficient as it could be.
(I imagine smaller sprites and/or a dot-replay option would GREATLY help with this problem as well.)
still using old server fr what I m told, so replays are bogged down ATM, been promised to be fixed soon, I can t watch any replays, at least I couldn t late last night, haven t been back for a bit, Peace Chad
I have an OLD computer... like 9 years old. I'm not kidding. As such, when I try to watch replays on here, it locks my computer up hopelessly. Just can't do it.
BUT... before anyone tells me to just get a new computer, I was able to get on a much newer computer yesterday (less than a year old) to watch some replays... and while the replays load, they are still a bit slow to load.
I'm wondering... is anyone else thinking that maybe the code for the replays needs to be optimized a bit, to cut down on load times for replays? If a computer less than a year old is having a little bit of trouble loading replays, that tells me the coding isn't as efficient as it could be.
(I imagine smaller sprites and/or a dot-replay option would GREATLY help with this problem as well.)
still using old server fr what I m told, so replays are bogged down ATM, been promised to be fixed soon, I can t watch any replays, at least I couldn t late last night, haven t been back for a bit, Peace Chad
DiMo28
offline
offline
Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
So will holding be allowed in the new game? Top of screen WR holding the crap out of the CB
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/58/9414
At least they appear to have front and backs programmed into the game now.
So will holding be allowed in the new game? Top of screen WR holding the crap out of the CB
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/58/9414
At least they appear to have front and backs programmed into the game now.
Originally posted by DiMo28
At least they appear to have front and backs programmed into the game now.
So holding would be ok, as long as they have fronts and backs?
At least they appear to have front and backs programmed into the game now.
So holding would be ok, as long as they have fronts and backs?
DiMo28
offline
offline
Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
So holding would be ok, as long as they have fronts and backs?
No, I'd like to see them get rid of blocking in the back too. I don't think I've noticed that yet though.
So holding would be ok, as long as they have fronts and backs?
No, I'd like to see them get rid of blocking in the back too. I don't think I've noticed that yet though.
copy/paste from elsewhere for completeness sake here:
You're kind of mixing GLB1 thinking with a GLB2 concept here.
There are roster minimums. So you couldn't sign just 22 Superstars or whatever.
If you max out your roster as much as possible with a bare bones roster and superstars the rest, you will likely lose b/c of stamina issues, and the potential chemistry issues if you lowball the rest of your roster.
The extra SPs right now are not locked in, theyr'e a starting point, the first alpha season will dictate what the Admins finally settle upon. I have faith they'll find a happy point. Theyr'e already talking of changing the SP bonus as well as increasing cost, or setting hard cap on superstars per team.
This game right now is Alpha, things can and will change.
An all OLine SS line would be possible right now w/out a massive hit to the team I think..you'd need 5 different agents though,
, b/c each agent only gets 1 SS at each tier, including 50 flex where OL are located.
Originally posted by TJ Spikes
#5 Just because the dot is a super star doesn't mean it'll actually be good. ZOMG i'm doing a QB with 95 Leadership, he'll command every WR to be awesome.
, you must have read my mind, this is hilarious and so so true. I'd rather not build a Superstar until a year in almost b/c of fear of not building right to begin with, O_O
You're kind of mixing GLB1 thinking with a GLB2 concept here.
There are roster minimums. So you couldn't sign just 22 Superstars or whatever.
If you max out your roster as much as possible with a bare bones roster and superstars the rest, you will likely lose b/c of stamina issues, and the potential chemistry issues if you lowball the rest of your roster.
The extra SPs right now are not locked in, theyr'e a starting point, the first alpha season will dictate what the Admins finally settle upon. I have faith they'll find a happy point. Theyr'e already talking of changing the SP bonus as well as increasing cost, or setting hard cap on superstars per team.
This game right now is Alpha, things can and will change.
An all OLine SS line would be possible right now w/out a massive hit to the team I think..you'd need 5 different agents though,
, b/c each agent only gets 1 SS at each tier, including 50 flex where OL are located.Originally posted by TJ Spikes
#5 Just because the dot is a super star doesn't mean it'll actually be good. ZOMG i'm doing a QB with 95 Leadership, he'll command every WR to be awesome.
, you must have read my mind, this is hilarious and so so true. I'd rather not build a Superstar until a year in almost b/c of fear of not building right to begin with, O_OOriginally posted by daryls61
Will there be injuries in GLB 2?
As far as I know, nope. Too many problems with paying to play and having a dot injured, etc.
Will there be injuries in GLB 2?
As far as I know, nope. Too many problems with paying to play and having a dot injured, etc.
Originally posted by GmanV2
As far as I know, nope. Too many problems with paying to play and having a dot injured, etc.
Stop posting here and get those ToC brackets up man
As far as I know, nope. Too many problems with paying to play and having a dot injured, etc.
Stop posting here and get those ToC brackets up man
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
