Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
1 Andre Johnson
2 Mike Furrey
3 Marvin Harrison
4 Torry Holt
5 Donald Driver
6 Laveranues Coles
7 T.J. Houshmandzadeh
7 Steven Jackson
9 Kellen Winslow
10 Reggie Bush


May you should stop making shit up to try and sound like you are correct. 2006 List, # of receivers sub 6'0? 1 Laveranues Coles.

2005

1 Larry Fitzgerald
1 Steve Smith
3 Anquan Boldin
3 Torry Holt
5 Chad Ochocinco
7 Donald Driver
7 Derrick Mason
9 Rod Smith
10 Santana Moss

Oh shit there are only 3 sub 6'0 receivers.

Your a complete joke bolick, keep making up statistics and trying to pass them as fact.
LMFAO

Originally posted by blln4lyf
Ugh, I added that last part because I knew you'd try to analyze me, incorrectly at that, and draw me into this...fml.

Also who the fuck is uscwhateverhisnameis?



I think it was regarding my Rose Bowl Champs? old username, I don't feel USC in the least though, so what do you know JDBOLICK MAKING THINGS UP AGAIN

Do you really just make things up in your head and hope no one spends the time to prove you wrong?

Pathetic

Originally posted by jdbolick

No, it fluctuates from season to season precisely because receiving success is not caused by height. For instance, there were five in the top 10 for 2006, and six in the top 10 for 2005.

What is it with some of the dumbest people on all of GLB trying to argue with me this off-season? Did someone put a curse on me? Am I an idiot magnet? I guess opposites do attract.

Fucking hilarious. Has anyone ever seen an argument where bolick didn't just randomly make shit off, and try to pass it off as fact? I bet when you took your act and got a 15, you probably explained to everyone else how you were about to get a 35. That is the beauty of a guy like you, you really don't realize how unintelligent you really are. Thanks for the cheap laughs.

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
May you should stop making shit up to try and sound like you are correct. 2006 List, # of receivers sub 6'0? 1 Laveranues Coles.
*sigh* Again, be thankful you will never know how annoying it is for an intelligent person to try and decipher whatever garbage comes out of that shriveled mass between your ears. This entire time we've been talking about receivers who are "6'0" or under."

2006:

1 Chad Ochocinco
2 Marvin Harrison - 6'0" or under
3 Reggie Wayne - 6'0" or under
3 Roy E. Williams
5 Donald Driver - 6'0" or under
6 Lee Evans - 6'0" or under
7 Anquan Boldin
8 Torry Holt - 6'0" or under
9 Terrell Owens
10 Steve Smith - 6'0" or under

2005 -

1 Steve Smith - 6'0" or under
2 Santana Moss - 6'0" or under
3 Chad Ochocinco
4 Larry Fitzgerald
5 Anquan Boldin
6 Torry Holt - 6'0" or under
7 Joey Galloway - 6'0" or under
8 Donald Driver - 6'0" or under
9 Plaxico Burress
10 Marvin Harrison - 6'0" or under

Originally posted by
Your a complete joke bolick, keep making up statistics and trying to pass them as fact.
Seriously, stop speaking to me as if we are equals. You are nothing. In fact, you are a pox, not only on this game but life in general. Your existence on this site amounts to nothing more than relentlessly kissing the ass of people who actually are relevant, in hopes of siphoning away some of their respect and attention. You re-named yourself to be the sidekick of someone else. Think about how sad that makes you. You haven't achieved anything in this game, and you really shouldn't be posting in the World League forum. You are completely and totally irrelevant, and if not for dpride liking the idea of having you around because he enjoys a good ego-stroke (and whatever else you might be stroking), no one would even know that you exist.

I have been talking about SUB 6'0 this entire time in every post, because 6'0 isn't short. As I stated in every post, lol @ you gripping up the most Average height in the NFL and calling it short.

As I said you are a joker, we are not equals. You are the dogshit I wipe off of my shoes, the crust that builds on the inside rim of a toilet.

And lol at you also for removing the receiving HBs, what when a HB catches the ball he isn't a receiver?

The HB's were all 6'0 or taller, manipulation much?

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
I have been talking about SUB 6'0 this entire time in every post, because 6'0 isn't short.
Where this started: http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3215435&page=9

"Were you trying to be funny? Height doesn't matter for a WR. Wes Welker, Reggie Wayne, Santonio Holmes, Steve Smith (NYG), DeSean Jackson, and Hines Ward are all six feet or under. That's six out of the top ten in receiving yards this season. Now of course height can be useful for a wide receiver, but to pretend like it's somehow necessary is silly."

You then responded to that and tried to argue with me about it, only it ended the same way every argument of yours ends, with you looking stupid and running to your patriarch for help.

Originally posted by
As I stated in every post, lol @ you gripping up the most Average height in the NFL and calling it short.
And I'll give an extra to this post. Kudos for again proving your ignorance by suggesting that 6'0" is the NFL average.

Steve Smith Carolina bump

Originally posted by jdbolick

And I'll give an extra to this post. Kudos for again proving your ignorance by suggesting that 6'0" is the NFL average.

6'0 if you remove O-Line, D-Line and QBs.

LBs, DBacks, WRs, HBs all fall around that #.

And lol @ your argument without including that 6'0 mark. 6'0 is not short for a receiver, it is not tall. Yet you include it into your data as if no one will realize the BS you are trying to pull to make yourself seem correct.

Now of course height IS useful for a wide receiver, but to pretend like it's somehow necessary is silly.

FYQ

NOT ENOUGH DIETER BROCK!!!!

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
6'0 if you remove O-Line, D-Line and QBs.
Still not even remotely close to being true.

Originally posted by
LBs, CBs, DBacks, WRs, HBs all fall around that #.
Linebackers average 6'0"? You and Tooley should have a contest to see who knows the least about the NFL. I honestly don't know who would win. The only ones you're correct about are cornerbacks and tailbacks, as their averages actually are close to 6'0".

Originally posted by
And lol @ your argument without including that 6'0 mark. 6'0 is not short for a receiver, it is not tall. Yet you include it into your data as if no one will realize the BS you are trying to pull to make yourself seem correct.
Don't pout because you suck at reading comprehension. You argued with something I said and you ended up getting destroyed. Maybe you should stop arguing with people vastly beyond your intellectual abilities. I'm sure there has to be some middle school board somewhere on the internet where you can have more success.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Don't pout because you suck at reading comprehension. You argued with something I said and you ended up getting destroyed. Maybe you should stop arguing with people vastly beyond your intellectual abilities. I'm sure there has to be some middle school board somewhere on the internet where you can have more success.

This is complete horseshit, your opinions are laughable.

Trying to call a 6'0 WR short is ridiculous. 5'8-5'11. as 6'2'6'5 Is tall.

6'0-6'1 is middle ground.

Your argument fails. I don't think there is a person in the planet who would say Height doesn't help a WR. It may not hurt someone, but it can always help.

I'm just arguing with chubby fantasy football star that thinks he deserves a slot on the NFL Network. Guess what? No one gives a fuck about what your double-chinned gullet flopping up and down has to say.

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
No one gives a fuck about what your double-chinned gullet flopping up and down has to say.

speaking of which...

Originally posted by Gart888
speaking of which...

Sadly I'm not 46 or however fucking old jdbolick is, I still have a metabolism and haven't resorted to eating pork rinds while attempting to be a Fantasy Football MVP on the internet.