Originally posted by zero
wtf is that a speed DE? people use those things?
i do
wtf is that a speed DE? people use those things?
i do
Forum > Pro Leagues > Season 30 GG Thread
bug03
offline
offline
Originally posted by ghuffman
sweet...i have been waiting for someone willing to put in the time to find this crap...thanks Hood
creek found it again and jt HOODwinked it
sweet...i have been waiting for someone willing to put in the time to find this crap...thanks Hood
creek found it again and jt HOODwinked it
Little M
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bladnach
GG globedotters. I could tell it wasn't the real indy gurupies because they always have our number
Maybe next season.
GG globedotters. I could tell it wasn't the real indy gurupies because they always have our number
Maybe next season.
Catch22
offline
offline
Originally posted by zakatakrr
GG JT
Looks like you broke GLB again:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2146495&pbp_id=6321705
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2146495&pbp_id=6321450
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2146495&pbp_id=6321103
Thanks for posting.
GG JT
Looks like you broke GLB again:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2146495&pbp_id=6321705
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2146495&pbp_id=6321450
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2146495&pbp_id=6321103
Thanks for posting.
Originally posted by Gambler75
Guess he didn't watch the pre-game breakdown of the Cowboys - Giants on ESPN ... they went on about the 4 sacks the Giants rolled up in the last matchup in '11 ... by bringing 5 man blitzes (4 DL + 1 LB) against the 7 man protection schemes of the Cowboys, and why they worked ...
Guess he didn't watch the pre-game breakdown of the Cowboys - Giants on ESPN ... they went on about the 4 sacks the Giants rolled up in the last matchup in '11 ... by bringing 5 man blitzes (4 DL + 1 LB) against the 7 man protection schemes of the Cowboys, and why they worked ...
HOODjelly
offline
offline
Originally posted by Catch22
P.S. Don't worry. That's 6 on 5. We won't touch it.
this is what's wrong with the game imo and this is coming from someone who benefited from the blitz. It's not the # of rushers vs the # of blockers, it's the fact that "adequate" blocking in GLB is to have the LOT shift over to pick up the DT while the G shift over to cover the space vacated by the C who found it more productive to pull to the left to cover the space vacated by the LOT....
This is a bug in the form of faulty blocking code. An exploit. Essentially, to get a proper block, the LOT needs to fail a vision check and remain on the DE. The play design doesn't call for a shift or pull yet half the O-Line scrambles around to pick up someone other than the man they're lined up against.
Like I said,
ETA - in other words, in order to make this play work from an offensive point of view, your C would have to be built like a LOT and possibly faster. Not realistic for any level of american football.
#2 ETA - The fault might actually lie with the C's blocking logic/pathing or a combination of O-Line logic. I think the C actually pulls first setting off the chain reaction (based on the visual). Regardless, it wouldn't have been pointed out (and cheered) if it was anything other than an exploit.
P.S. Don't worry. That's 6 on 5. We won't touch it.
this is what's wrong with the game imo and this is coming from someone who benefited from the blitz. It's not the # of rushers vs the # of blockers, it's the fact that "adequate" blocking in GLB is to have the LOT shift over to pick up the DT while the G shift over to cover the space vacated by the C who found it more productive to pull to the left to cover the space vacated by the LOT....
This is a bug in the form of faulty blocking code. An exploit. Essentially, to get a proper block, the LOT needs to fail a vision check and remain on the DE. The play design doesn't call for a shift or pull yet half the O-Line scrambles around to pick up someone other than the man they're lined up against.
Like I said,
ETA - in other words, in order to make this play work from an offensive point of view, your C would have to be built like a LOT and possibly faster. Not realistic for any level of american football.
#2 ETA - The fault might actually lie with the C's blocking logic/pathing or a combination of O-Line logic. I think the C actually pulls first setting off the chain reaction (based on the visual). Regardless, it wouldn't have been pointed out (and cheered) if it was anything other than an exploit.
Edited by HOODjelly on Sep 8, 2012 04:10:21
Edited by HOODjelly on Sep 8, 2012 03:40:20
Edited by HOODjelly on Sep 8, 2012 03:39:56
zakatakrr
offline
offline
Originally posted by Catch22
P.S. Don't worry. That's 6 on 5. We won't touch it.
reported
P.S. Don't worry. That's 6 on 5. We won't touch it.
reported
Catch22
offline
offline
I was being sarcastic when I said we wouldn't touch it. Already notified Bort about putting in a fix for it so enjoy it while you can.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
