Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Malachorn
Originally posted by Skanker irl

But why so gay?

That's your reality and how you choose to see things, tbh?
And, FYI, it is NOT supposed to be "so gay."

It was taken from a calendar aimed at females.
It was not supposed to be a "gay calendar" or anything... it seems the gay community sorta enjoyed the pic.
There's a whole story, tbh.

So yeah, I like the pic.
And if you choose to see it as gay then that's on you, mate? That's the way you chose to see it and it says more about you than me, tbh.


Winking is kinda homo

If this will work any season, it will be this season. The passing game hasn't been working as well anywhere. Running QB isn't a half-bad option when every QB looks like the reincarnation of Dan McGwire.

Originally posted by Malachorn

So yeah, I like the pic.
And if you choose to see it as gay then that's on you, mate? That's the way you chose to see it and it says more about you than me, tbh.


I feel e-violated for some reason.

It actually says nothing because what I type here is all fun and games. So my opinion of your picture is actually less relevant than you taking the time to 1) Choose the picture 2) put it in your avatar and 3) try to blab on about some bs psychological reason why others have an opinion about the picture.

Originally posted by Domer
Then this argument is done. If you don't watch the games you don't have a leg to stand on.

You continue to harp on YPC. It is false to assume YPC is THE indicator of effectiveness running the FB.

Let's step away from this game for a minute to ask you a simple question...

Two basketball players:

Player A - Averages 20,6 PPG
Player B - Averages 3.4 PPG

Who is more effective?

Domer

Are you kidding me?
Tea Baggins has scored SIGNIFICANTLY more on running plays than Falco.
If anything, his YPC has suffered and he should be averaging less yards because of this. He has way outperformed your running QB - and you don't have to watch the games to even see this, as the numbers are actually so conclusive, thanks to the TDs.

...unless you're suggesting that the QB is a better short yardage (power?) runner than the FB or HB?
Fine. Let's see some evidence of that.

This should be great, tbh.

Originally posted by Nuge20
Originally posted by Domer

Originally posted by Malachorn


Originally posted by Domer



First off YPC is not the be all end all stat to prove efficiency or effectiveness.

You rush Falco because the design of the QB run plays allows you to take advantage of a defense. Is that hard to understand? Both the timing of the play and the angles created to pursue the ball carrier are different for QB runs and HB runs. You can exploit weaknesses with one run that you can't with another. Watch some of the Kai game... The rushing QB my have a less YPC #, but he hits some pretty crucial plays and makes some very good runs.

Domer

I don't care enough to watch some Kai games, tbh.
I'd love for you to show me how a QB that typically runs for less yards, on average, than either of the RBs deserves to be running the ball.

I mean... on the average play, your QB runs for less yards than either RB.

Then this argument is done. If you don't watch the games you don't have a leg to stand on.

You continue to harp on YPC. It is false to assume YPC is THE indicator of effectiveness running the FB.

Let's step away from this game for a minute to ask you a simple question...

Two basketball players:

Player A - Averages 20,6 PPG
Player B - Averages 3.4 PPG

Who is more effective?

Domer

Other stats tbh...20.6 points could be like Kevin Durant in OKC (he avgs 30+ now tho) and compared to Rondo who scores less I would say Rondo is more effective

lol... they were actually two player I coached a few years ago, we couldn't have won without either of them. Each had there nitch and executed when needed...

Originally posted by Domer

BINGO...

And there's your answer to why run a QB when a HB has more YPC Malachom..Look deeper into the situation and you might learn something

Domer
Pretty weak argument in my eyes.
There is a lot things that go into a basketball's effectiveness. Since he/she is judged not only on scoring but also how many shots taken, defense, rebounding ability, etc.
When in comparison the QB and the HB are ONLY response for rushing the ball for as many yards as they can get.
Your only true defense is that it is early in the season so there hasn't been enough trials to come up with a true YPC.

Can we get this thread stickied?

Originally posted by Malachorn
Originally posted by Domer

Then this argument is done. If you don't watch the games you don't have a leg to stand on.

You continue to harp on YPC. It is false to assume YPC is THE indicator of effectiveness running the FB.

Let's step away from this game for a minute to ask you a simple question...

Two basketball players:

Player A - Averages 20,6 PPG
Player B - Averages 3.4 PPG

Who is more effective?

Domer

Are you kidding me?
Tea Baggins has scored SIGNIFICANTLY more on running plays than Falco.
If anything, his YPC has suffered and he should be averaging less yards because of this. He has way outperformed your running QB - and you don't have to watch the games to even see this, as the numbers are actually so conclusive, thanks to the TDs.

...unless you're suggesting that the QB is a better short yardage (power?) runner than the FB or HB?
Fine. Let's see some evidence of that.

This should be great, tbh.

Feel that swoosh over your head.... you missed the point AGAIN.

Domer

Originally posted by Domer
BINGO...

And there's your answer to why run a QB when a HB has more YPC Malachom..Look deeper into the situation and you might learn something

Domer

lol - again, I refuse to believe he's the best short yardage runner...
And I would still love for you guys to show any sorta evidence that would suggest such a thing, tbh.

I think you're being very defensive because you maybe even realise I'm right and you guys made a terrible mistake, tbh.

Originally posted by BaseballGuyCAA
If this will work any season, it will be this season. The passing game hasn't been working as well anywhere. Running QB isn't a half-bad option when every QB looks like the reincarnation of Dan McGwire.

I haven't had any issues with passing.

Originally posted by Malachorn

I think you're being very defensive because you maybe even realise I'm right and you guys made a terrible mistake, tbh.

The mistake is so terrible that we are 0-2.

Oh...

wait...

Originally posted by Skanker irl

The mistake is so terrible that we are 0-2.

Oh...

wait...

You guys are really counting the first game as a win?

Originally posted by sirallan
Pretty weak argument in my eyes.
There is a lot things that go into a basketball's effectiveness. Since he/she is judged not only on scoring but also how many shots taken, defense, rebounding ability, etc.
When in comparison the QB and the HB are ONLY response for rushing the ball for as many yards as they can get.
Your only true defense is that it is early in the season so there hasn't been enough trials to come up with a true YPC.

Or, possibly, the types of runs he does are specialised short yardage runs.
I highly doubt, however, that the QB is the best-suited runner for short yardage plays.

I mean, you'd think the opposite and, as such, the QBs YPC should actually benefit from not trying to run those plays that aren't trying to get more than a couple yards.

Originally posted by sirallan
Originally posted by Skanker irl


The mistake is so terrible that we are 0-2.

Oh...

wait...

You guys are really counting the first game as a win?

Hell yeah. We love beating down scrubs.

Originally posted by Skanker irl
Can we get this thread stickied?

Well, I'll tell you this much:
People that read this thread won't be making running QBs next season.

People, you're welcome.