Warrior General Games

sully, where do you live anyway? I will definately get you a steak dinner if we get into the playoffs and you are in the vicinity of my existance.

Originally posted by blaslo
sully, where do you live anyway? I will definately get you a steak dinner if we get into the playoffs and you are in the vicinity of my existance.

Well, if you're anywhere near Minnesota, we'll talk.

Judging from your scenarios, i'm no where near Minnesota but i'll paypal you the money for that Steak Dinner.

If Miami loose, we are through is basically what it comes down to.
And with us up against the Louisiana Ragin Cajuns, thats basically what we will need to happen.

Should also be up there:

If Bud Dry wins they clinch the #4 seed.

Originally posted by mattynokes
Should also be up there:

If Bud Dry wins they clinch the #4 seed.

Go Portland

Originally posted by mattynokes
Should also be up there:

If Bud Dry wins they clinch the #4 seed.

Not necessarily. If Bud Dry wins, North Carolina wins, and the Commandos lose, then it goes to points scored to sort that out, as all teams would be 12-4.

At that point, Bud Dry would have to outscore the Commandos by 61 to leapfrog them, and outscore North Carolina by 91 to leapfrog them.

Had to double check the numbers, but they are right, in which case, Bud Dry would get the 5th seed, even though they won.

Sully, how can the Nudists finish with the 3rd seed even though they lost to Commandos and Bud Dry?

Originally posted by robjay08
Sully, how can the Nudists finish with the 3rd seed even though they lost to Commandos and Bud Dry?

Head to head tiebreakers don't appear to apply when three teams are involved, unless Bort changed something I did not see. As a result of that, there is still a chance, thanks to points scored, that North Carolina finishes higher than the Commandos and Bud Dry.

thanks and thanks again for all of your work

Originally posted by guide

5(add). How are ties broken in the standing?
-----a. If there are only 2 teams, it's just based upon the head-to-head matchup
-----b. If there are more than 2 teams, then it's based upon these factor in this order:
1. # of head-to-head wins against the other teams with the same record
2. # of points scored
3. # of points allowed.

Looks like head to head counts against other teams of the same record

PHHHHHT yeah right like the beer barons are gonna win...i laugh at the comedy of such a statement.

Originally posted by naraic
Originally posted by guide


5(add). How are ties broken in the standing?
-----a. If there are only 2 teams, it's just based upon the head-to-head matchup
-----b. If there are more than 2 teams, then it's based upon these factor in this order:
1. # of head-to-head wins against the other teams with the same record
2. # of points scored
3. # of points allowed.

Looks like head to head counts against other teams of the same record

That's news to me!

...son of a bitch, now I have to make sure this doesn't fuck with my scenarios.

Yeah I was gonna say. It just doesn't make sense for Team A to not get priority (higher seed) over Teams B and C when Team A beat both Teams B and C. Three way ties should always go to the head-to-head matchups first to see if anything can be resolved there.

Originally posted by mattynokes
Yeah I was gonna say. It just doesn't make sense for Team A to not get priority (higher seed) over Teams B and C when Team A beat both Teams B and C. Three way ties should always go to the head-to-head matchups first to see if anything can be resolved there.

I agree 100%. I just remember hearing that head to head doesn't count when three teams are involved, that it is strictly points scored.

Originally posted by koldfront
PHHHHHT yeah right like the beer barons are gonna win...i laugh at the comedy of such a statement.


Good luck buddy. Darren Sanderson can't wait to meet you on he field