http://goallineblitz.com/game/home.pl?user_id=78362 <-------Troll
His post was 1:06 seconds after mine. Talk about paranoid. Refresh much?
His post was 1:06 seconds after mine. Talk about paranoid. Refresh much?
Last edited Aug 25, 2008 16:54:59
alfies
offline
offline
You're right. I'm just following you.
I mean, I'm not reading the active threads or anything.
Again, I guess it's that tolerant side of you. You know, the side that insults gay people?
I mean, I'm not reading the active threads or anything.
Again, I guess it's that tolerant side of you. You know, the side that insults gay people?
Pariah
offline
offline
Originally posted by alfies
You're right. I'm just following you.
I mean, I'm not reading the active threads or anything.
Again, I guess it's that tolerant side of you. You know, the side that insults gay people?
I never insulted you.
I just reasonably deducted a couple of conclusions.
You're right. I'm just following you.
I mean, I'm not reading the active threads or anything.
Again, I guess it's that tolerant side of you. You know, the side that insults gay people?
I never insulted you.
I just reasonably deducted a couple of conclusions.
alfies
offline
offline
Originally posted by Pariah
Originally posted by alfies
You're right. I'm just following you.
I mean, I'm not reading the active threads or anything.
Again, I guess it's that tolerant side of you. You know, the side that insults gay people?
I never insulted you.
I just reasonably deducted a couple of conclusions.
You deduced that responding to you on an internet message board makes one homosexual?
You're using gay in a derogatory manner. That's insulting.
Let the tolerance flow in Rhode Island.
Originally posted by alfies
You're right. I'm just following you.
I mean, I'm not reading the active threads or anything.
Again, I guess it's that tolerant side of you. You know, the side that insults gay people?
I never insulted you.
I just reasonably deducted a couple of conclusions.
You deduced that responding to you on an internet message board makes one homosexual?
You're using gay in a derogatory manner. That's insulting.
Let the tolerance flow in Rhode Island.
niners420
offline
offline
I'm not a bigot. Dude I know what its like to be hated against. I'm far from being a bigot!
Pariah
offline
offline
Originally posted by alfies
Originally posted by Pariah
Originally posted by alfies
You're right. I'm just following you.
I mean, I'm not reading the active threads or anything.
Again, I guess it's that tolerant side of you. You know, the side that insults gay people?
I never insulted you.
I just reasonably deducted a couple of conclusions.
You deduced that responding to you on an internet message board makes one homosexual?
You're using gay in a derogatory manner. That's insulting.
Let the tolerance flow in Rhode Island.
Insult ---> you are pathetic.
Deduction ---> you are trolling and stalking me - leading me to believe you are gay.
Insult---> Me insulting my own intelligence by even responding to your weak attempts at what you believe are insults.
Conclusion---> I am done with acknowledging your weak and pathetic nonsense.
Originally posted by Pariah
Originally posted by alfies
You're right. I'm just following you.
I mean, I'm not reading the active threads or anything.
Again, I guess it's that tolerant side of you. You know, the side that insults gay people?
I never insulted you.
I just reasonably deducted a couple of conclusions.
You deduced that responding to you on an internet message board makes one homosexual?
You're using gay in a derogatory manner. That's insulting.
Let the tolerance flow in Rhode Island.
Insult ---> you are pathetic.
Deduction ---> you are trolling and stalking me - leading me to believe you are gay.
Insult---> Me insulting my own intelligence by even responding to your weak attempts at what you believe are insults.
Conclusion---> I am done with acknowledging your weak and pathetic nonsense.
Last edited Aug 25, 2008 17:17:11
brownryango
offline
offline
Originally posted by niners4207
I'm not a bigot. Dude I know what its like to be hated against. I'm far from being a bigot!
who hated on you? musta been them chinks or gooks. goddamnit this is america! yeeha!
I'm not a bigot. Dude I know what its like to be hated against. I'm far from being a bigot!
who hated on you? musta been them chinks or gooks. goddamnit this is america! yeeha!
brownryango
offline
offline
Originally posted by Pariah
Deduction ---> you are trolling and stalking me - leading me to believe you are gay.
yeah, he's gay for your PvP persona. that must be it.
c'mon dude. alfies is an admitted robophile. you putting that avatar up there gets him all hot and bothered. it has nothing to do with man on man sex. it has everything to do with man on cartoon robot sex. lose the icon, or you'll never lose alfies.
Deduction ---> you are trolling and stalking me - leading me to believe you are gay.
yeah, he's gay for your PvP persona. that must be it.
c'mon dude. alfies is an admitted robophile. you putting that avatar up there gets him all hot and bothered. it has nothing to do with man on man sex. it has everything to do with man on cartoon robot sex. lose the icon, or you'll never lose alfies.
Last edited Aug 26, 2008 06:24:38
Niveus
offline
offline
Originally posted by DrkSandman
I guess to each their own, but why spend (by my calculations) $249 per season to boost your team, and have no human interaction, when you could just shell out a few bucks for Total Pro Football? We can fit roughly 8 seasons into a year, so dude plans to spend almost $2k on this game this year?
After 10 seasons when players start to decline, he could retire them all and get the 70% back, but unless you want to start all over at that point, you'd have to start bringing in your new players around the 7th or 8th season.
Did he just not do this math in his head? Does he not intend to boost? Is he a retired executive with tons of cash, and doesn't care what we think?
Or, the most probable, am I missing something here?
Whatever the reasoning is, I just can't see the point in investing that kind of cash to a certain 30% loss.
Just answering the original poster here, cause I reckon that it would be a waste of energy to take the current issue into account.
I myself have had both my only players in Pariah's team and I have experienced his social attitude to players. Although I hate to see the team restarted as this, it was a thing that Pariah had to do for his own reasons and I respect that decision.
Why am I saying this? I think the statement of Pariah having no human interaction is severely overstated and untrue. Don't see this as an troll-action or an attack to your side. I like the fact that you come with questions that require well-founded answers.
I guess to each their own, but why spend (by my calculations) $249 per season to boost your team, and have no human interaction, when you could just shell out a few bucks for Total Pro Football? We can fit roughly 8 seasons into a year, so dude plans to spend almost $2k on this game this year?
After 10 seasons when players start to decline, he could retire them all and get the 70% back, but unless you want to start all over at that point, you'd have to start bringing in your new players around the 7th or 8th season.
Did he just not do this math in his head? Does he not intend to boost? Is he a retired executive with tons of cash, and doesn't care what we think?
Or, the most probable, am I missing something here?
Whatever the reasoning is, I just can't see the point in investing that kind of cash to a certain 30% loss.
Just answering the original poster here, cause I reckon that it would be a waste of energy to take the current issue into account.
I myself have had both my only players in Pariah's team and I have experienced his social attitude to players. Although I hate to see the team restarted as this, it was a thing that Pariah had to do for his own reasons and I respect that decision.
Why am I saying this? I think the statement of Pariah having no human interaction is severely overstated and untrue. Don't see this as an troll-action or an attack to your side. I like the fact that you come with questions that require well-founded answers.
Originally posted by dvdatm
Originally posted by alfies
Man, Pariah is really paranoid.
I guess he couldn't come to grips with the fact that his team wasn't that great.
It seems that he did come to the conclusion that his team wasn't that good and took steps for a long-term solution.
Hey, I considered it early this season. I knew we'd be a 10-11 win team in the weak ass Western Conference, and thought about blowing it up, because we still can't beat Hobbs, Tulsa, or Island. And, I don't even want to think about playing the best teams in the East.
Sometimes, you just have to do it. His method is a little odd.. and expensive.. but whatever.
Originally posted by alfies
Man, Pariah is really paranoid.
I guess he couldn't come to grips with the fact that his team wasn't that great.
It seems that he did come to the conclusion that his team wasn't that good and took steps for a long-term solution.
Hey, I considered it early this season. I knew we'd be a 10-11 win team in the weak ass Western Conference, and thought about blowing it up, because we still can't beat Hobbs, Tulsa, or Island. And, I don't even want to think about playing the best teams in the East.
Sometimes, you just have to do it. His method is a little odd.. and expensive.. but whatever.
Originally posted by Niveus
Originally posted by DrkSandman
I guess to each their own, but why spend (by my calculations) $249 per season to boost your team, and have no human interaction, when you could just shell out a few bucks for Total Pro Football? We can fit roughly 8 seasons into a year, so dude plans to spend almost $2k on this game this year?
After 10 seasons when players start to decline, he could retire them all and get the 70% back, but unless you want to start all over at that point, you'd have to start bringing in your new players around the 7th or 8th season.
Did he just not do this math in his head? Does he not intend to boost? Is he a retired executive with tons of cash, and doesn't care what we think?
Or, the most probable, am I missing something here?
Whatever the reasoning is, I just can't see the point in investing that kind of cash to a certain 30% loss.
Just answering the original poster here, cause I reckon that it would be a waste of energy to take the current issue into account.
I myself have had both my only players in Pariah's team and I have experienced his social attitude to players. Although I hate to see the team restarted as this, it was a thing that Pariah had to do for his own reasons and I respect that decision.
Why am I saying this? I think the statement of Pariah having no human interaction is severely overstated and untrue. Don't see this as an troll-action or an attack to your side. I like the fact that you come with questions that require well-founded answers.
Yeah, I was just curious. I went to start my advanced game planning for them and saw they had been gutted (again) and was wondering what the deal was.
How this thread became one of calling people bigots and paranoid is beyond me. What is it with this league? Do you all really hate each other this much? lol
Originally posted by DrkSandman
I guess to each their own, but why spend (by my calculations) $249 per season to boost your team, and have no human interaction, when you could just shell out a few bucks for Total Pro Football? We can fit roughly 8 seasons into a year, so dude plans to spend almost $2k on this game this year?
After 10 seasons when players start to decline, he could retire them all and get the 70% back, but unless you want to start all over at that point, you'd have to start bringing in your new players around the 7th or 8th season.
Did he just not do this math in his head? Does he not intend to boost? Is he a retired executive with tons of cash, and doesn't care what we think?
Or, the most probable, am I missing something here?
Whatever the reasoning is, I just can't see the point in investing that kind of cash to a certain 30% loss.
Just answering the original poster here, cause I reckon that it would be a waste of energy to take the current issue into account.
I myself have had both my only players in Pariah's team and I have experienced his social attitude to players. Although I hate to see the team restarted as this, it was a thing that Pariah had to do for his own reasons and I respect that decision.
Why am I saying this? I think the statement of Pariah having no human interaction is severely overstated and untrue. Don't see this as an troll-action or an attack to your side. I like the fact that you come with questions that require well-founded answers.
Yeah, I was just curious. I went to start my advanced game planning for them and saw they had been gutted (again) and was wondering what the deal was.
How this thread became one of calling people bigots and paranoid is beyond me. What is it with this league? Do you all really hate each other this much? lol
Logan3334
offline
offline
Originally posted by DrkSandman
Originally posted by dvdatm
Originally posted by alfies
Man, Pariah is really paranoid.
I guess he couldn't come to grips with the fact that his team wasn't that great.
It seems that he did come to the conclusion that his team wasn't that good and took steps for a long-term solution.
Hey, I considered it early this season. I knew we'd be a 10-11 win team in the weak ass Western Conference, and thought about blowing it up, because we still can't beat Hobbs, Tulsa, or Island. And, I don't even want to think about playing the best teams in the East.
Sometimes, you just have to do it. His method is a little odd.. and expensive.. but whatever.
do you really consider the west to be weak? and if so any weaker then the east?
I think the top teams on both sides are about the same level...and I would not call either side weak. Teams that move out of the BBB#4 such as BTB have proved they are a contender in the A league. Weak really?
Originally posted by dvdatm
Originally posted by alfies
Man, Pariah is really paranoid.
I guess he couldn't come to grips with the fact that his team wasn't that great.
It seems that he did come to the conclusion that his team wasn't that good and took steps for a long-term solution.
Hey, I considered it early this season. I knew we'd be a 10-11 win team in the weak ass Western Conference, and thought about blowing it up, because we still can't beat Hobbs, Tulsa, or Island. And, I don't even want to think about playing the best teams in the East.
Sometimes, you just have to do it. His method is a little odd.. and expensive.. but whatever.
do you really consider the west to be weak? and if so any weaker then the east?
I think the top teams on both sides are about the same level...and I would not call either side weak. Teams that move out of the BBB#4 such as BTB have proved they are a contender in the A league. Weak really?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
