Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Florida__boi08


just because you read the thread dosnt mean you know what happened, all of the players are in better situations, unless they were dumb and took forever to find a trade.

If shagg ever got another team, i along with many other former novas would join the team

That is all fine and good, so they are dumb that their owner couldn't handle the job? Okay.

Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
Originally posted by Doc




I'm not a kid so you can pack that little line up. As for Shagg and you, PM him and discuss it.

There is no reason for you to flame in this thread and to now, obviously, bait Shagg to post.

Well your not a kid, that is very surprising then that you would think the Pro leagues are some great league that clearly plenty of other leagues have teams that can compete in as well.

Well shagg wanted to make another excuse for the Pros inspite of what capone noted.

I wish I were a kid again. I could go on with my life not knowing about the things I've seen during my lifetime. You see, I save lives for a living.

The Pro leagues are the best leagues. Period. If they weren't, they wouldn't be called Pro.

Originally posted by Doc


The Pro leagues are the best leagues. Period. If they weren't, they wouldn't be called Pro.




Then why do they get beat by teams in lesser leagues? It is a rhetorical question we all know the answer and any excuse has been heard already. The name of the leagues are just names until the relegation/promotion situation has had the ample time to do its thing.

Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
Originally posted by Doc



The Pro leagues are the best leagues. Period. If they weren't, they wouldn't be called Pro.




Then why do they get beat by teams in lesser leagues? It is a rhetorical question we all know the answer and any excuse has been heard already. The name of the leagues are just names until the relegation/promotion situation has had the ample time to do its thing.

The SEC is the best conf. in CFB, but every once in awhile an SEC team is going to lose to the Big 10. Ok, maybe not the Big 10, but you get the picture.

I could care less what you think the guys on my team we're my boys and always will be. As far as scrimmages go they don't mean shit and they are basically just tactic practice. Florida knows me as well as anyone on here and he's a great guy and he'll be my GM again. It's the way it is.

Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
Originally posted by Doc



The Pro leagues are the best leagues. Period. If they weren't, they wouldn't be called Pro.




Then why do they get beat by teams in lesser leagues? It is a rhetorical question we all know the answer and any excuse has been heard already. The name of the leagues are just names until the relegation/promotion situation has had the ample time to do its thing.

Two words.

Giants win.

Originally posted by Shagg
I could care less what you think the guys on my team we're my boys and always will be. As far as scrimmages go they don't mean shit and they are basically just tactic practice. Florida knows me as well as anyone on here and he's a great guy and he'll be my GM again. It's the way it is.

scrims can be whatever you make of them sure. saying they don't mean shit is just another excuse for when the teams in this league get beat or have close games. Just because you don't lose energy you think they don't matter and thats fine. But the SIM still plays it out as if its any other game SIMed only they dont lose the energy after it. Seems legit to me. If the Pros were the best of the best they could do ass-backward tactics and still win, otherwise in about 6 more seasons of promotion/ relegation we might have a real pecking order. Until then the excuses are just excuses for fear of being like us low leaguers.

Originally posted by Doc
Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet

Originally posted by Doc




The Pro leagues are the best leagues. Period. If they weren't, they wouldn't be called Pro.




Then why do they get beat by teams in lesser leagues? It is a rhetorical question we all know the answer and any excuse has been heard already. The name of the leagues are just names until the relegation/promotion situation has had the ample time to do its thing.

Two words.

Giants win.



If that means any team can get lucky it is nothing more than another excuse. Seeing how the Giants weren't from a lower league than the Patriots I am not sure what your point is there. Laymen terms please.

Saying the Pros suck like the OP says is obviously an attention getter rather than his true thoughts of the league.

Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
Originally posted by Doc

Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet


Originally posted by Doc





The Pro leagues are the best leagues. Period. If they weren't, they wouldn't be called Pro.




Then why do they get beat by teams in lesser leagues? It is a rhetorical question we all know the answer and any excuse has been heard already. The name of the leagues are just names until the relegation/promotion situation has had the ample time to do its thing.

Two words.

Giants win.



If that means any team can get lucky it is nothing more than another excuse. Seeing how the Giants weren't from a lower league than the Patriots I am not sure what your point is there. Laymen terms please.


He's just saying that a weaker team can beat one with greater talent. Not that hard to follow.

In fact, for the 4 major sports, well more than 50% of the time the best team doesn't win it all. It is statistically improbable for the best team to go from day 1 of the season to winning the championship.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
In fact, for the 4 major sports, well more than 50% of the time the best team doesn't win it all. It is statistically improbable for the best team to go from day 1 of the season to winning the championship.

Honestly, I would contend that in real life if a team wins it all they are by default the best team.

You can argue stats and talent, etc....but if a team wins a Super Bowl they are the best team in football that year. Period. Can't acocunt for things like heart and intangibles with stats. And IRL that stuff counts.

I guess in GLB the intangibles are a RNG and tactics and maybe confidence. But the best team really *should* win most of the time.

Originally posted by xManning1018x


He's just saying that a weaker team can beat one with greater talent. Not that hard to follow.

That is only if you think the Giants were a weaker team, which I don't.

Originally posted by purehatred


Honestly, I would contend that in real life if a team wins it all they are by default the best team.


I can see why somebody would contend that but I totally disagree with that concept. I think if you are looking to define the "best", a one football game contest is a horrible non-precise way to make such a determination.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by purehatred



Honestly, I would contend that in real life if a team wins it all they are by default the best team.


I can see why somebody would contend that but I totally disagree with that concept. I think if you are looking to define the "best", a one football game contest is a horrible non-precise way to make such a determination.

That's because you have some delusional belief that statistical analysis is more important than things like basic humanity.

The Giants showed up, played their asses off, fought harder, executed when it counted, and played better in the single biggest game of the year. They BEAT the Pats. They ARE the better team.

The fact that you don't get that means you don't really understand football or athletes and you would probably be a terrible coach/GM in real life.

Athletics is more than just numbers, TSE.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by purehatred



Honestly, I would contend that in real life if a team wins it all they are by default the best team.


I can see why somebody would contend that but I totally disagree with that concept. I think if you are looking to define the "best", a one football game contest is a horrible non-precise way to make such a determination.

Ya purehatred is right TSE. If you played football at any level (which is easy to tell you didn't based on that statement) you would know about the intangibles. Performing when it counts is a factor you cannot plan for. purehatred said it so well I can't even elaborate on it.