Warrior General Games

Originally posted by brownsfan92
Originally posted by Seizure

Originally posted by Usama


I am going to go watch Big 12 execute that masterful plan right now. Amazing! I am getting better at Defensive Coordinator bit by bit.

I don't think we will be able to surpass Chicago for third spot, unless they lose one more game.

'Forcing' 4 turnovers helps anyone's defensive game plan. =) Having your offense go turnover free in the same game = a HUGE boost to your defensive game plan..

Still only winning the game by a field goal...

Means I'd be very careful about how masterful I thought I was..


I'm speaking with the understanding that you are not on Big 12.. I'm just saying..



And I am certainly not discrediting Big 12 at all. It was a great win for them and they have a solid team. Part of being a good defense is forcing turnovers.. just making the observation that they might not force the same turnover differential if they see Indy again in the playoffs.. and in my opinion, if they didn't, they would be in trouble.


Anyone can sulk about losing games because of turnovers. It's part of the game and everyone should except them in triumph or defeat.


Wow.. really? I know your excited because you guys managed to win a big game, but maybe you should pay a little more attention to the people who make comments before you make your replies towards them. I'm going to assume your new to the league or something. Also.. in case your wondering.. I have nothing to sulk about when it comes to your team. I was 3-1 in my life time against you guys with Birmingham. I could care less who won the game between Big 12 and Indy.

I am in no way affiliated with Indy, so again.. the 'sulking' comment is silly. I made a comment and an observation in response to the comment of how 'masterful' the game planning was on the part of Big 12. I thought I would bring it to the attention of Usama that this 'masterful' game planning only won the game by 3 points with 4 TOs. I even said in my post that "part of being a good team is forcing turnovers," so in no way was I using them as an excuse. Let me reiterate the fact that I don't care who wins the game, so why would I make excuses for another team? The point of my post was to say that.. given your teams history and the way they have performed over the past 3 seasons.. I do not think you will beat Indy again without having a +4 turnover margin. If you would have actually read what I wrote.. you would have gotten the message.

Stop getting defensive. I said my intentions were not to discredit your team and I gave you guys credit for being a solid team and pulling off a good win.

Turnovers are a part of the game. Big 12 got them and we didn't. There's no crying in football, Big 12 played a solid game and beat us. Credit to them for a game well played, they earned it.

Originally posted by Seizure
Originally posted by brownsfan92

Originally posted by Seizure


Originally posted by Usama



I am going to go watch Big 12 execute that masterful plan right now. Amazing! I am getting better at Defensive Coordinator bit by bit.

I don't think we will be able to surpass Chicago for third spot, unless they lose one more game.

'Forcing' 4 turnovers helps anyone's defensive game plan. =) Having your offense go turnover free in the same game = a HUGE boost to your defensive game plan..

Still only winning the game by a field goal...

Means I'd be very careful about how masterful I thought I was..


I'm speaking with the understanding that you are not on Big 12.. I'm just saying..



And I am certainly not discrediting Big 12 at all. It was a great win for them and they have a solid team. Part of being a good defense is forcing turnovers.. just making the observation that they might not force the same turnover differential if they see Indy again in the playoffs.. and in my opinion, if they didn't, they would be in trouble.


Anyone can sulk about losing games because of turnovers. It's part of the game and everyone should except them in triumph or defeat.


Wow.. really? I know your excited because you guys managed to win a big game, but maybe you should pay a little more attention to the people who make comments before you make your replies towards them. I'm going to assume your new to the league or something. Also.. in case your wondering.. I have nothing to sulk about when it comes to your team. I was 3-1 in my life time against you guys with Birmingham. I could care less who won the game between Big 12 and Indy.

I am in no way affiliated with Indy, so again.. the 'sulking' comment is silly. I made a comment and an observation in response to the comment of how 'masterful' the game planning was on the part of Big 12. I thought I would bring it to the attention of Usama that this 'masterful' game planning only won the game by 3 points with 4 TOs. I even said in my post that "part of being a good team is forcing turnovers," so in no way was I using them as an excuse. Let me reiterate the fact that I don't care who wins the game, so why would I make excuses for another team? The point of my post was to say that.. given your teams history and the way they have performed over the past 3 seasons.. I do not think you will beat Indy again without having a +4 turnover margin. If you would have actually read what I wrote.. you would have gotten the message.

Stop getting defensive. I said my intentions were not to discredit your team and I gave you guys credit for being a solid team and pulling off a good win.


Who's getting defensive now??? Obviously I knew you werent with Indy because you are a GM with Ludlow. I said "anyone" can sulk, thus eliminating any chance of it being directed to you. However, you missed that and tried to justify it by pulling numbers out of your ass about how you are 3-1 against us. Well congratulations, your prize is in the mail.

So before you lecture me about acutally reading what someone wrote, take your own advice jackass.

Originally posted by brownsfan92


Who's getting defensive now??? Obviously I knew you werent with Indy because you are a GM with Ludlow. I said "anyone" can sulk, thus eliminating any chance of it being directed to you. However, you missed that and tried to justify it by pulling numbers out of your ass about how you are 3-1 against us. Well congratulations, your prize is in the mail.

So before you lecture me about acutally reading what someone wrote, take your own advice jackass.


When you make the statement "anyone can sulk.." after a reply where nobody has mentioned anything about 'sulking' and I am the only person who has made a comment about turnovers, your statement is automatically being implied towards me. If you want to make a 'generalized' message directed towards 'anyone,' learn how to not quote what a particular person says.

I didn't miss anything.. and I didn't try to 'justify' anything. I was making it clear to you that I have no reason to make comments trying discredit anyone. I gave your team credit. I've been playing your team since before you were in BBB #10. I have nothing but respect for all the owners here and anyone who has actually been around and active knows that and knows my reputation. I have not once come to this board and attempted to sling dirt or talk down about anyone.

I probably could have done without assuming you were defensive, but when you make a reply directed towards me (again.. learn what it means to quote someone) then I feel obligated to clear up any misunderstanding or to point out the fact that you didn't read the message.

Of course.. I guess in your attempt to try and make me look bad.. or whatever you were trying to do.. you have to come back and resort to calling me a jackass. Wow.. I have a 12 year old cousin who does that.

By the way.. saying "anyone" can sulk does everything EXCEPT eliminate the chance it can be directed at me. Add in the fact that you quoted me.. and it's pretty obvious your comment was directed towards me. Otherwise.. you never would have posted anything in this thread anyways, correct? Thought so..

Go crawl back into your hole or learn to read/interpret what people write.

Originally posted by Seizure
When you make the statement "anyone can sulk.." after a reply where nobody has mentioned anything about 'sulking' and I am the only person who has made a comment about turnovers, your statement is automatically being implied towards me. If you want to make a 'generalized' message directed towards 'anyone,' learn how to not quote what a particular person says.

I didn't miss anything.. and I didn't try to 'justify' anything. I was making it clear to you that I have no reason to make comments trying discredit anyone. I gave your team credit. I've been playing your team since before you were in BBB #10. I have nothing but respect for all the owners here and anyone who has actually been around and active knows that and knows my reputation. I have not once come to this board and attempted to sling dirt or talk down about anyone.

I probably could have done without assuming you were defensive, but when you make a reply directed towards me (again.. learn what it means to quote someone) then I feel obligated to clear up any misunderstanding or to point out the fact that you didn't read the message.

Of course.. I guess in your attempt to try and make me look bad.. or whatever you were trying to do.. you have to come back and resort to calling me a jackass. Wow.. I have a 12 year old cousin who does that.

By the way.. saying "anyone" can sulk does everything EXCEPT eliminate the chance it can be directed at me. Add in the fact that you quoted me.. and it's pretty obvious your comment was directed towards me. Otherwise.. you never would have posted anything in this thread anyways, correct? Thought so..

Go crawl back into your hole or learn to read/interpret what people write.

All I can say is *kapow* as Seizure looks over the complete discombobulated body Brownsfan!

Serious Browns, Seizure is a complete class act and always has been.

So if we beat Tampa they will be out of the playoffs, since the Deatons are probably going to win their last two games?

Originally posted by Seizure
Originally posted by brownsfan92



Who's getting defensive now??? Obviously I knew you werent with Indy because you are a GM with Ludlow. I said "anyone" can sulk, thus eliminating any chance of it being directed to you. However, you missed that and tried to justify it by pulling numbers out of your ass about how you are 3-1 against us. Well congratulations, your prize is in the mail.

So before you lecture me about acutally reading what someone wrote, take your own advice jackass.


When you make the statement "anyone can sulk.." after a reply where nobody has mentioned anything about 'sulking' and I am the only person who has made a comment about turnovers, your statement is automatically being implied towards me. If you want to make a 'generalized' message directed towards 'anyone,' learn how to not quote what a particular person says.

I didn't miss anything.. and I didn't try to 'justify' anything. I was making it clear to you that I have no reason to make comments trying discredit anyone. I gave your team credit. I've been playing your team since before you were in BBB #10. I have nothing but respect for all the owners here and anyone who has actually been around and active knows that and knows my reputation. I have not once come to this board and attempted to sling dirt or talk down about anyone.

I probably could have done without assuming you were defensive, but when you make a reply directed towards me (again.. learn what it means to quote someone) then I feel obligated to clear up any misunderstanding or to point out the fact that you didn't read the message.

Of course.. I guess in your attempt to try and make me look bad.. or whatever you were trying to do.. you have to come back and resort to calling me a jackass. Wow.. I have a 12 year old cousin who does that.

By the way.. saying "anyone" can sulk does everything EXCEPT eliminate the chance it can be directed at me. Add in the fact that you quoted me.. and it's pretty obvious your comment was directed towards me. Otherwise.. you never would have posted anything in this thread anyways, correct? Thought so..

Go crawl back into your hole or learn to read/interpret what people write.

Your statement was quoted because it mentioned turnovers and how the Big 12 won because of it. Well congratualtions for pointing something so mundane out.
I simply stated to your general comment that anyone can sulk because of turnovers, its part of the game. Nothing directed to you, just using your quote as a platform.

However, you then acted like a "jackass" and tried to rip me apart because you took it personal. However, you already stated that could of done without assuming, which is the reason we are going back and forth in the first place.

"Add in the fact that you quoted me.. and it's pretty obvious your comment was directed towards me. Otherwise.. you never would have posted anything in this thread anyways, correct? Thought so.. "

Another incorrect statement. I already addressed your so called claim and I find it very funny that you are trying to answer on my behalf.

I could of also done without the jackass comment but you completely jumped down my throat for using your quote to address the turnover aspect of the game.

Go crawl back to my hole huh? I've been in USA BBB 10 for over two seasons and rarely post in the main forum. I simply pop my head in, read anything that might be worth a damn and post something if necessary. I'll continue to do so.

Teutonic, don't be the little kid who jumps in after the dust settled. It looks foolish.

Originally posted by brownsfan92
Blah, blah, blah

The written word can suck at times for intent, etc.

The dust keeps getting stirred up because you keep posting on the topic.

Just let it go. The more you respond, the worse it makes you look in the forum here.

Originally posted by brownsfan92
Teutonic, don't be the little kid who jumps in after the dust settled. It looks foolish.


Mine may look foolish, but everytime you hit reply, you remove all doubt yours is foolish.

In my time here in BBB, and each subsequent year that I peek in here and read the posts you have been the only one to insult Seizure or imply that he is biased. Is he above reproach, certainly not. Are you overstating and stepping overline with some childish lip, certainly are, but hey if you like it keep on keeping on.

ROUND 1:

Chicago Capones vs. NewDawn Thrashing Badgers - I don't think their winning streak will be broken, yet.
Denver Stallions vs. Big 12 Champions -
Indianapolis Warlords vs. Pittsburgh Deatons - Deatons are not as good as Big 12 so Indy will win.
Ludlow Lions vs. Greensboro Tsunami - I will call an upset here. Tsunami wins because they go ridiculously crazy in facet of the game. Be it, one-sided rushing gameplan or a million turnovers. But if Ludlow changes their gameplan drastically then Greensboro do not have a chance.

Don;t wanna sound cocky.....but 1 down 2 to go...

Good game New Dawn....

Good game Deatons. That was closer than I would have liked but a win is a win.

Damn it! My prediction of the upset, almost got fulfilled. Greensboro lost by a freakin' point.

Originally posted by Usama
ROUND 1:

Chicago Capones vs. NewDawn Thrashing Badgers - I don't think their winning streak will be broken, yet.
Denver Stallions vs. Big 12 Champions -
Indianapolis Warlords vs. Pittsburgh Deatons - Deatons are not as good as Big 12 so Indy will win.
Ludlow Lions vs. Greensboro Tsunami - I will call an upset here. Tsunami wins because they go ridiculously crazy in facet of the game. Be it, one-sided rushing gameplan or a million turnovers. But if Ludlow changes their gameplan drastically then Greensboro do not have a chance.


12 games in a row... let's roll Ludlow. I just sold a house on Ludlow St in the San Fernando Valley (outer LA.) We're a different team than you faced before.

gg Ludlow. you have beat us enough now so go on and win two more.