Warrior General Games

Originally posted by bigcc
I am at 4 INTs with my safety


I bet no one has as many combined FF's/Ints as me though



Thats impressive. Are you on wrap up tackling?

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=669951

Check out what playing on a shitty team can do for you.

nice tackling

I have 2 total so far for my SS's career. I have him always play the run so I dont expect many.

Originally posted by bigcc
I am at 4 INTs with my safety


I bet no one has as many combined FF's/Ints as me though



I'm sure someone has more than both of us, but...
In regular season play I have 7 ints and 2 FFs (counting scrimmage games, 9 and 3). Though you having 4 and 4 is impressive, I'm not as balanced as that. Like the other guy asked are you playing on wrap up?

I have 4 FF's. All on wrap up. I tried two games on balanced tackling and got zero. Missed one tackle so I went back to wrap up. And forced another fumble lol.

Leads me to believe FFumbles have more to do with SA's than tackling style. Because you can't force a fumble if you miss the tackle. That's the way it seems to me.

Originally posted by Riggs_Inator
Leads me to believe FFumbles have more to do with SA's...

yes there's one SA that makes all the difference...

Originally posted by zero
Originally posted by Riggs_Inator

Leads me to believe FFumbles have more to do with SA's...

yes there's one SA that makes all the difference...



wat 1, or are u jus playin? Cuz I heard big hit and monster hit are broked.

Originally posted by NutsNutsNutz
Originally posted by zero

Originally posted by Riggs_Inator


Leads me to believe FFumbles have more to do with SA's...

yes there's one SA that makes all the difference...



wat 1, or are u jus playin? Cuz I heard big hit and monster hit are broked.

I dunno, all the FF I have on wrap up lead me to believe that it isn't. People probably just claim that because they keep missing tackles on balanced/power tackling. And when you cause a fumble it still counts as a tackle which points to the belief that in order to force a fumble, you can't miss the tackle.

IMO. Fumbles should have a few different possibilities.
A: Tackle, No Fumble. B. Tackle, Fumble. C. Missed tackle, no fumble. D. Missed Tackle, fumble.

But I think its only, A. Missed tackle, no fumble. B. Tackle no fumble. or C. Tackle, Fumble.

I don't know. Just speculation.

Last year as a full time starter i had 7 ints and 4 ffumb on a team that finished in the top 4 in the conference. This year i'm splitting time 40-45 plays a game and i have 4ints and 2ffumb on the top team in the conference.

My FS has 6 interceptions with 2 forced fumbles and 17 pass deflections so far this season.

Originally posted by Riggs_Inator
Originally posted by NutsNutsNutz

Originally posted by zero


Originally posted by Riggs_Inator



Leads me to believe FFumbles have more to do with SA's...

yes there's one SA that makes all the difference...



wat 1, or are u jus playin? Cuz I heard big hit and monster hit are broked.

I dunno, all the FF I have on wrap up lead me to believe that it isn't. People probably just claim that because they keep missing tackles on balanced/power tackling. And when you cause a fumble it still counts as a tackle which points to the belief that in order to force a fumble, you can't miss the tackle.

IMO. Fumbles should have a few different possibilities.
A: Tackle, No Fumble. B. Tackle, Fumble. C. Missed tackle, no fumble. D. Missed Tackle, fumble.

But I think its only, A. Missed tackle, no fumble. B. Tackle no fumble. or C. Tackle, Fumble.

I don't know. Just speculation.

yes big hit and monster hit suck, it isn't those 2. it's closing speed