Warrior General Games

Originally posted by anarqy

I'm sick of hearing all this crap about the East being better then the West
so what if the West has more gutted teams? the best teams (and the best competition) are still in the West by far
need I remind you that both champions have come from the West?
the top 8 teams in the East had decent records and made the playoffs; team #9 is 5-11
the top 10 teams in the West had decent records; team 8 was 9-7, but teams #9 and #10 were 8-8 (which would have made the playoffs in the East)
so how can you say the East has better teams?

You're joking, right? In last season's crossover, we slaughtered the west. The fact that both champions come from the west has absolutely nothing to do with the other 15 teams in your conference.

And using your records (which you got by playing other easy teams in the West), well that's just silly.

I agree with anargy, the top teams in the BBB#8 have always been in the West.

You beat me to it Krunchy...

Originally posted by anarqy
...so how can you say the East has better teams?

11-5 inter-conference record kinda suggests it, hehe



Originally posted by Dustin Diamond
I agree with anargy, the top teams in the BBB#8 have always been in the West.

Says the man that just lost to the East



Get the fire burning early for next season....woohoo!

Originally posted by anarqy
welcome to the new teams too

Originally posted by Audiophanatic

I know lol, the west now has three teams that will get beat by 100 points every game. The only team in the east that anyone put 100 on was Rochester, and only 2 teams did that.

Don't get me wrong, I love that we have better competition, but it pisses me off that it's so imbalanced. Stats, record, everything is blown out of proportion in these games.

The Reno Knights could very well be a playoff team.
The Replacements will have 2000 points scored aganst them this year.

I'm sick of hearing all this crap about the East being better then the West
so what if the West has more gutted teams? the best teams (and the best competition) are still in the West by far
need I remind you that both champions have come from the West?
the top 8 teams in the East had decent records and made the playoffs; team #9 is 5-11
the top 10 teams in the West had decent records; team 8 was 9-7, but teams #9 and #10 were 8-8 (which would have made the playoffs in the East)
so how can you say the East has better teams?

He did't say the East had better teams. He said he hates the imbalance because you've had some pushover teams at the bottom that skew the stats. I believe (but won't speak for) Audio has great respect for the top half of the West as do most of the owners and players of the East.
So maybe lay off the caffeine a little and put credit where credit is due. BOth conferences have some very fine teams who could beat each other on any given SUnday.
If you freaks are so bent out of shape about it then I suggest you start saving your flex points so that you can play friendlies against the East. As a matter of fact. I double dog dare you (thats a really, really big dare) to get a winning record against the top 5 east teams in friendlies that YOU pay for.
Personally, I couldn't give a crap who is better. Wait for it...I'll say it...wait...wait...The West is better....does that make you feel better now?

moo

PS you're arguement is lame using records btw since Audios point was that you had multiple walkover games where all you worry about is maxing points.

Quack Attack is under new management, changed name to Riverhead Blue Waves. We have been working real hard to improve our team and look forward to being more competitive then in the past.

I thought Quack Attack improved greatly last season & were on the right track. Good luck guys.

Getting Philly sent to the West wasn't exactly a pushover game; and some of the pushover teams are rebuilding, so what's your point?

BTW - Welcome new guys....get better really, really quick so the East can stop bitchin!!

@Krunchy, Buster Hymen, Moo45

lets see, last season, the West had 3 gutted teams, 3 poor teams, and 10 upper tier teams that could have made the playoffs.

The East had 2 gutted teams, 6 poor teams, and 8 upper tier teams

so what conference had tougher competition? the WEST

furthermore, you guys say you beat us in inter league this season; so what? we beat you in inter league last season. Furthermore, 3 of your interleague victories were against gutted teams, whereas only TWO of ours were. so again, shut your traps about this "unfair balance between the east and west". they are perfectly balanced in my opinion; and if you really want to get technical, the EAST is the weak conference... not the West

Welcome!

Originally posted by anarqy
@Krunchy, Buster Hymen, Moo45

lets see, last season, the West had 3 gutted teams, 3 poor teams, and 10 upper tier teams that could have made the playoffs.

The East had 2 gutted teams, 6 poor teams, and 8 upper tier teams

so what conference had tougher competition? the WEST

furthermore, you guys say you beat us in inter league this season; so what? we beat you in inter league last season. Furthermore, 3 of your interleague victories were against gutted teams, whereas only TWO of ours were. so again, shut your traps about this "unfair balance between the east and west". they are perfectly balanced in my opinion; and if you really want to get technical, the EAST is the weak conference... not the West

Can't agree the Western conference is tougher, after all this season the East had a winning record against the west. With that said, the disparity of competition between the two conferences is small.. not a huge margin.

Originally posted by anarqy
@Krunchy, Buster Hymen, Moo45

lets see, last season, the West had 3 gutted teams, 3 poor teams, and 10 upper tier teams that could have made the playoffs.

The East had 2 gutted teams, 6 poor teams, and 8 upper tier teams

so what conference had tougher competition? the WEST

furthermore, you guys say you beat us in inter league this season; so what? we beat you in inter league last season. Furthermore, 3 of your interleague victories were against gutted teams, whereas only TWO of ours were. so again, shut your traps about this "unfair balance between the east and west". they are perfectly balanced in my opinion; and if you really want to get technical, the EAST is the weak conference... not the West

Yes well I think the North Conference is the best. They beat the South AND Southeast Conferences. Clearly, your logic is flawed.

Originally posted by DietWater
Originally posted by anarqy

@Krunchy, Buster Hymen, Moo45

lets see, last season, the West had 3 gutted teams, 3 poor teams, and 10 upper tier teams that could have made the playoffs.

The East had 2 gutted teams, 6 poor teams, and 8 upper tier teams

so what conference had tougher competition? the WEST

furthermore, you guys say you beat us in inter league this season; so what? we beat you in inter league last season. Furthermore, 3 of your interleague victories were against gutted teams, whereas only TWO of ours were. so again, shut your traps about this "unfair balance between the east and west". they are perfectly balanced in my opinion; and if you really want to get technical, the EAST is the weak conference... not the West

Yes well I think the North Conference is the best. They beat the South AND Southeast Conferences. Clearly, your logic is flawed.

Whoa....settle down their, if any SEC homers here you say that your toast

<Wipes drool from chin while quietly giggling in the corner>

Hehehehehe

Originally posted by anarqy
@Krunchy, Buster Hymen, Moo45

lets see, last season, the West had 3 gutted teams, 3 poor teams, and 10 upper tier teams that could have made the playoffs.

The East had 2 gutted teams, 6 poor teams, and 8 upper tier teams

so what conference had tougher competition? the WEST

furthermore, you guys say you beat us in inter league this season; so what? we beat you in inter league last season. Furthermore, 3 of your interleague victories were against gutted teams, whereas only TWO of ours were. so again, shut your traps about this "unfair balance between the east and west". they are perfectly balanced in my opinion; and if you really want to get technical, the EAST is the weak conference... not the West

Lighten up Francis

'My conference is harder'

blah blah blah

What matters is who wins in the end.
Period.