Warrior General Games

Yep, thats why I said OL is hard because you should use sacks and hurries given up and to whom and then also probably how successful the offense was and also the same goes for FBs .. because what makes a good FB? Stats arent everything with the two positions but I did the best I could given what I have to work with.

Also, it provides a platform for yall to do exactly what you are doing, giving feedback and providing more data that saves me time

Ill work on defense some time soon, its really hard because my internet connection is good at work, but I have none or I have to pay like 10$ a day while I am still living in a hotel until September (its complicated to rent an apartment in Europe).

I have about 1/3 of the defense done now, I have all the DBs done and I have started on the LBs.

Defense is so much more complicated, because you really have to look at the snap count of each person as well as you have to sit there and sort out who plays what position. I can probably get the defense team out tomorrow if Im lucky. DL is easier to quantify than DBs .. LBs are probably the most difficult.

Originally posted by Randy03Texags
and also the same goes for FBs .. because what makes a good FB?


Pancakes might be a good add in, if you are using them for TE's.

GOOD JOB RANDY. CANT WAIT FOR THE DEFENSE TO COME OUT.

Cant wait to see your take on defense randy, I liked the offensive one. Not too many SGA players, just goes to show, that we share snaps alot on offense.

My NT had shitty stats.
If you look at avery single game, i am double and triple teamed ))
I dont care about stats.
Budapest has one of the best rush Ds cuz of me P

Originally posted by Jumpingjak
Cant wait to see your take on defense randy, I liked the offensive one. Not too many SGA players, just goes to show, that we share snaps alot on offense.

And there may be an argument that BOTH Stalingrad FBs could be nominated.

I disagree with Frye being the best, but good job with the writeup anyway.

Originally posted by Lance
I disagree with Frye being the best, but good job with the writeup anyway.

I agree

lance, who do you think was the better QB?

the winner???

Originally posted by Thepet
lance, who do you think was the better QB?

Knowing him, himself. It's arguable, that's for sure.

it is, and I see reasons for both of them too be, I was actually just very curious, its a curse

It sounded kind of...accusatory I guess. Going purely on stats will never show the whole story, but it gives a picture.

**EDIT** Raider brings up a good point, we shall see who is the better QB in the next game! hope we have a good one, and I hope all you SGA players break your legs!

GLHF and eat babies everyone, we shall see who comes out on top.

I am honestly not trying to troll. It just doesn't add up all that well in his favor. I took 200+ more snaps, had almost 1000 more yards, one more touch down, and my only downer is five more interceptions.

Taking 200 more snaps is a negative in my eyes, it means that you should have about 2000 more yards (10YPC) and not 1000 and also way more TDs.

I did everything based on performance per snaps .. if you look at his QB Rating it is higher, that is because it uses the same metric as me. I DID give the nod to people who had higher bulk stats (like your passing) when the per snap performance was similar. But per snap Fry was the best QB who had such high performance and I value efficiency.

That doesnt mean that you didnt rock the league, that is false, you kicked ass, its just that if I had to choose a QB for one pass, it would be Fry and not Enright.

To further show the point, look at the HBs, Martinez was clearly the best in every way, there is no doubt there. But for 2 and 3 it came down to Cabrera having more bulk stats and then Lloyd had a better yards per carry, but even that didnt make up for the fact that Cabrera had more yards and more TDs .. at least in my mind.

Again its all subjective, but I am willing to explain my methodology to anyone who is curious.