User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
tonato
offline
Link
 
Paris Musketeers will send their ballot through Kongemeier, our defensive Coord.

Thx for organizing this
 
CapnCrunch
offline
Link
 
I love it when a plan comes together...

<queue music>
 
Mike Rogers
Lead Tester
offline
Link
 
I am in the middle of updating the Alpha Stat Tracker for the last few games...

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pC42ofCsspZ2nRExzo1l6Tw

QBs and WRs are up to date for all 16 Regular Season Games.
(The rest only have up to Game 11 Data)

I'll do the rest tomorrow at work and update it.
 
sarcasmag08
offline
Link
 
Please dont forget that I was out and Mantis little Debbie was 3rd string for over half the season. When I came back, he started. He hasnt looked back since. Check him out. WR- FTAs.
 
helluin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by sarcasmag08
Please dont forget that I was out and Mantis little Debbie was 3rd string for over half the season. When I came back, he started. He hasnt looked back since. Check him out. WR- FTAs.


3rd string is not a bad spot - it's arguably the best spot for a WR to be in.
 
sarcasmag08
offline
Link
 
....except he got about 15-20 less plays per game.
 
Mike Rogers
Lead Tester
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by sarcasmag08
....except he got about 15-20 less plays per game.


WR3 gets targetted about 50% more than WR2 and 33% more than WR1 (Unless targets are in effect.)

 
coreyls18
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mike Rogers
Originally posted by sarcasmag08

....except he got about 15-20 less plays per game.


WR3 gets targetted about 50% more than WR2 and 33% more than WR1 (Unless targets are in effect.)



Thats not true...compare my WR 1,2, and 3 on my team..
WR1 - http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=61656&playoffs=0 - 181 receptions
WR2 - http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=51992&playoffs=0 - 97 receptions
WR3 - http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=65494&playoffs=0 - 61 receptions
Last edited Jul 17, 2008 10:04:01
 
helluin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mike Rogers
Originally posted by sarcasmag08

....except he got about 15-20 less plays per game.


WR3 gets targetted about 50% more than WR2 and 33% more than WR1 (Unless targets are in effect.)



Frequency totally depends on defensive coverage...at least if your QB isn't blind as a bat, anyway.
 
coreyls18
offline
Link
 
I agree, its all based off of coverage and whos open.
 
Mike Rogers
Lead Tester
offline
Link
 
Its true as far as the Primary Reciever is concerned, as to who the QB checks off to is down to coverage and favourites.
 
jprietman
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by boomer82
Originally posted by Hampe

Originally posted by Kevin Smith


Originally posted by Hampe



Originally posted by Kevin Smith




Girlfriendīs giving me hell for all the time I spend "watching those little round things move around", or scouting as I prefer to call it.
Haha....same problem here. She couldn't believe it when I told her I spent money on this game.



You told her? Kudos, man. Mine would go crazy.
Hehe....yea, I had to justify sitting there watching the dots instead of spending time with her somehow . Of course, I didn't tell her how much....then she probably would have gone crazy.



My wife watches Rock of Love. She loses all arguments when it comes to watching stupid things.


I watched that show...

But to be fair, its because Jessica is a personal friend of mine and her ex-boyfriend was my roommate in Arizona.
 
Link
 
Dextroyers vote send.
 
exgambler
offline
Link
 
Heat vote send.
 
Link
 
FTA vote sent
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.