Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Mystico3
Originally posted by truCarl



having four 4th and 1's and kicking on all of them when we would go for them AND get them if allowed isn't something to hang your hat on




yeah, but you didn't have any of them, and it never came into play.
55, 52, 48, 47, were the FG's, and none were less than 4th and 7...so what was that about hanging my hat on something?
you had a 23 yarder, that was handed to you on a turnover. You took over on the 27, and saw the redzone for the first and only time that game, and kicked on 4th and 5.

you are undefeated, and you shut down our O.

He was referring to the short-yardage plays before punts. We had a 4th and .5, a 4th and 1, and a 4th and 2 I think he said. We subscribe to the Bill Bellichek guidelines on 4th down situations.

Mystico3 - all the 4th and goal comments are coming from the LA game since we were comparing them 4th and short were from punts


as for the mistake against the bulls, yea that was my fault haha - i talked them into starting me and putting a stronger reciever in the 3rd/slot position

Originally posted by FriskyMonkey
Mystico3 - all the 4th and goal comments are coming from the LA game since we were comparing them


as for the mistake against the bulls, yea that was my fault haha - i talked them into starting me and putting a stronger receiver in the 3rd/slot position

No way. those comments were directed towards our game, just didn't know the facts, and thats ok, I looked. We weren't comparing the LA game, the 3 of us were talking about our previous matchup since it was so offensive for me to say "I like our chances".
Also, He said 4th and 1 but deciding to kick FG's, a setting he will change.....how do any of you figure he was talking about punts? He was inferring that the FG's were attempted on 4th and short.

As for the best WR in the slot, I would think that would set up a great mismatch if the SS or LB are not fast. was he chosen as "favorite target"?

i have more faith in Carl that he wouldnt confuse the matchup against LA with your team haha

we had NO 4th and short/goal FGs against you...we had FIVE against LA - please tell me how he must have gotten his facts that fucked up...



and yea about the WR thing i thought it would too haha - we didnt set him as favorite, but i figured with all the looks i was getting deflected a better WR would be able to make plays on them which didnt pan out - he had one of my average games haha

i see us talking about our game, the LA game, and your game against LA - please quote something a bit more substantial where he actually says directly which team he is referring to

also learn to quote the entire message when you're trying to prove a point - grabbing 1 sentence taken out of the rest of the post makes you look like a retard trying to fix the argument to your favor


EDIT: also learn to type outside that little quote box so your posts are readable - its not that hard

well, i did type outside the "quote", not sure why it occurs.

As for why I only quoted that part, it was because that was the main part, but i will quote the entire thing since i guess going back to just read it must be a pain...1 sec

The problem was we were already getting pretty good production from our #3 receiver regardless because Speedy is pretty damn fast. We didn't really gain a whole lot moving Jackson to #3 from #2 but Speedy had one of his worst games in the #2 spot. So now we're leaving Jackson and Bates as our two starters that can produce against a lot of teams and giving Speedy the good matchups.

this is just from a player (or 5) from just me. i am part of LA.

ok so far i am reading this and it is just getting me thinking.
Our O-line for the run blocking is pancake wise at the top of their game.

Now if we decide to run up the middle we will and we have a great shot with our
C Bet, thinks if he moves forward and blocks the MLB you LB is toast.

Personally my G is our backup G and he is 2nd in the conference with pancakes, so we dont lose out with our Gs when it comes to that.

Now i dont remember what else i was gonna say

Originally posted by truCarl
Originally posted by Mystico3

I guess you don't remember that you scored all of 1 offensive TD and a bunch of long FG's, and I was still at OLB, since the move to MLB. nobody has come close to seeing 165 yds rushing. I actually like the matchup if we meet again.
Oh, and yeah, your other TD was an INT Return (yes, your "speedy monkey" beat our ex starting CB for a clinching TD late).

I would take Voodoo and the points....not sure about money line though

I guess you don't remember we still put up 343 yards of offense and beat you soundly 26-6

having four 4th and 1's and kicking on all of them when we would go for them AND get them if allowed isn't something to hang your hat on, the game chose that not us. (I will edit this to say not on the FG's, but those situations in general)

When the score is 26-6 there are no "clinching" TD's, you would have been beaten even without that.

there is only ONE team in this league that even deserves to talk the SLIGHTEST amount of shit towards us or even hint about being able to beat us and that is Florida. Until one of you other teams even comes close to hanging with us you should prolly keep your mouth shut.



how is he talking about LA speedy? this is 100000% directed to me, and the conversation for a few posts before this was our game.

looks like someone else is COMMENTING on the Sim, and he is on your team. but you go ahead and keep calling it whining, what ever makes ya feel good

Originally posted by mathwizcory
this is just from a player (or 5) from just me. i am part of LA.


Our O-line for the run blocking is pancake wise at the top of their game.



Now that worries me

Originally posted by Mystico3
well, i did type outside the "quote", not sure why it occurs.

As for why I only quoted that part, it was because that was the main part, but i will quote the entire thing since i guess going back to just read it must be a pain...1 sec

no my main concern with making sure you're quoting the whole post is because obviously as the other thread we're chatting in you seem to "miss" parts of posts to further your own argument

Originally posted by FriskyMonkey




3rd a 20 point loss doesn't equate to a "clutch" TD in the 4th, guess who still lost by 13 if the pass stayed deflected? (i like the ego stroke though haha)




it was 16-6 when you scored onthe play after i hawked you on the 21 yd gain (like that ego stroke....slowpoke...lol

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?pbp_id=6968871

I was wrong, this was your 2nd time in the red zone, and your O earned this one, not handed to you like the other time.

Originally posted by FriskyMonkey
Originally posted by Mystico3

well, i did type outside the "quote", not sure why it occurs.

As for why I only quoted that part, it was because that was the main part, but i will quote the entire thing since i guess going back to just read it must be a pain...1 sec

no my main concern with making sure you're quoting the whole post is because obviously as the other thread we're chatting in you seem to "miss" parts of posts to further your own argument

I'm not a spinner. I had quoted the entire thing a couple times, and you asked for a "Specific" quote, so I pulled that one. I reposted the whole thing above for your reading pleasure.

Apology accepted