Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Dr. E
Hmm, I'm guessing you three just aren't trying to understand, preferring instead to troll. I could be wrong though, and you are just stupid, so I'll explain. If a TE cuts someone, he shrinks just like the defender he blocked. Therefore, he can't block another until he gets up which is generally too late. Imagine he doesn't cut block, he may cake the defender then go on to cake more. I've seen three defenders caked in the same play a few times, two many more times.

someone confusing cut block with get low? They aren't the same thing you know....

Lol

Originally posted by geekor
someone confusing cut block with get low? They aren't the same thing you know....

Exactly

Dr. E does it again!

Originally posted by Dr. E
Hmm, I'm guessing you three just aren't trying to understand, preferring instead to troll. I could be wrong though, and you are just stupid, so I'll explain. If a TE cuts someone, he shrinks just like the defender he blocked. Therefore, he can't block another until he gets up which is generally too late. Imagine he doesn't cut block, he may cake the defender then go on to cake more. I've seen three defenders caked in the same play a few times, two many more times.

This has been pointed out by some unfriendlier voices, but I'll add a friendly voice to the chorus:

"Get Low" is not the same thing as "Cut Block."

Originally posted by jdbolick
Get Low is a good choice for blocking TEs. I also like Lead Block as a bonus SA.

To get away from the muck and mire and get to answering the OP's question... I 110% agree with JD on this as SA's of choice.

alright sounds like there is a real consensus to stick with get low.

I was wondering about it because it doesn't seem like the TE gets into too many "push fights" where pushing a little harder would make a big deal

but I watched some more tape and it looks like there are still plenty