raise it to 57 imo
every team needs back up Kicker and Punter....just in case
every team needs back up Kicker and Punter....just in case
Forum > Suggestions > Reduce team roster size by 2 players every season for the next 10 seasons
Moretti
offline
offline
glb looks at roster size as a percentage of flex cost/potential profit.....i doubt they will lower the roster size without somehow increasing the cost to own an individual player more.
Dr. E
offline
offline
changing roster size would be a major change to the game, so I don't think it's a good idea.
Guppy, Inc
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bane
raise it to 57 imo
every team needs back up Kicker and Punter....just in case
go all in for a college size roster. isnt that like 85 or somewhere around that?
raise it to 57 imo
every team needs back up Kicker and Punter....just in case
go all in for a college size roster. isnt that like 85 or somewhere around that?
chief c
offline
offline
No, suffer through the graphics and weird chit in GLB2 if that's what you want. no more "game changers" for GLB please.
Fool around with the interface, lower prices, allow instant builds, full VA resets, make a better user experience, sure! But let's not screw with the SIM anymore or the factors that influence it.
Fool around with the interface, lower prices, allow instant builds, full VA resets, make a better user experience, sure! But let's not screw with the SIM anymore or the factors that influence it.
Originally posted by chief c
No, suffer through the graphics and weird chit in GLB2 if that's what you want. no more "game changers" for GLB please.
Fool around with the interface, lower prices, allow instant builds, full VA resets, make a better user experience, sure! But let's not screw with the SIM anymore or the factors that influence it.
Having your players on the field more is not improving the user experience?
No, suffer through the graphics and weird chit in GLB2 if that's what you want. no more "game changers" for GLB please.
Fool around with the interface, lower prices, allow instant builds, full VA resets, make a better user experience, sure! But let's not screw with the SIM anymore or the factors that influence it.
Having your players on the field more is not improving the user experience?
Guppy, Inc
offline
offline
Originally posted by TruthHammer
Having your players on the field more is not improving the user experience?
and there lies the problem with glb. the casual user just wants to see their dots play. but people who run teams want control over every aspect and specialists for each aspect. so us control freaks build our specialists, while the casual agents say that its too expensive for such little actual game time.
Having your players on the field more is not improving the user experience?
and there lies the problem with glb. the casual user just wants to see their dots play. but people who run teams want control over every aspect and specialists for each aspect. so us control freaks build our specialists, while the casual agents say that its too expensive for such little actual game time.
Dr. E
offline
offline
If you want fewer players on the team, you don't need a mandated roster reduction to do so. Just don't sign the extra dots.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
