Warrior General Games

I wouldn't have to cut down much at all to build a team like that. If I can do it simple with the 43 man roster GLB2 supplied me with it isn't all that hard. That is the problem. There are too many easy corners to cut.

What I am saying is that you aren't going to be able to have 2x bTEs, 2xrTEs, pHB, eHB, sHB, bFB, sFB, rQB, pQB, 5xbWRs, 5xrWRs, as well as dual o-lines like you currently can. Sure you can mix it up still, but not to the same extent.
Un-nerfing the DPC alone would go a long way to combat that imo. Not a perfect solution, but serviceable.

Well I wouldn't actually need the RQB, 3 of the BWR's, 2 of the RWR's, and certainly not the EHB. I also wouldn't need 5 Run Block olinemen.

Custom Slots make everything cheesy and easy.

Originally posted by bhall43
Scout me out bro

http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy78/bhall43/lolsingleback_zps0843792d.gif

Don't see how you would need to scout each play like that. I'd run my standard 2-7 plays that are setup to run against the Singleback formation, depending on the tags and the down/distance.

Besides, I sacked you with my fully open-moving DPC options that are available in scrims against OPC plays, so it doesn't matter.

Originally posted by bhall43
Seems time wasteful. This isn't a live game so it would be super irritating to scout. I would rather concentration spent on the things that do effect the daily game to game schedule.

Also, it is a lolscrim... if you set up anything more than your standard DAI, I'd laugh at you. I did say that you couldn't run it except in lolscrims.

Originally posted by bhall43
Scout me out bro

http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy78/bhall43/lolsingleback_zps0843792d.gif

But just to cover this off:

I'd either run a nickel 3 or a dime 4 depending on the down/distance/tagging.

All 3 WRs are in single man coverage, with zone help over/under depending on down/distance/tagging. The HB and TE might be in single man coverage depending on their tag and the down/distance. I may have an under zone, I may have a blitz, I may have a single man cover, I may even have a double man cover in certain situations, depending on the tag.

I don't need to look at what plays you are drawing up... I look at my team's strengths and weaknesses and base my playcalling based on what you are sending out (formation/down/distance/tagging).

Originally posted by bhall43
Custom Slots make everything cheesy and easy.

and more realistic.......

Originally posted by dbreeze
and more realistic.......

As long as you're wearing blinders and only looking at it in a vacuum, yes.

Originally posted by Time Trial
Don't see how you would need to scout each play like that. I'd run my standard 2-7 plays that are setup to run against the Singleback formation, depending on the tags and the down/distance.

Besides, I sacked you with my fully open-moving DPC options that are available in scrims against OPC plays, so it doesn't matter.

Your standard 2-7 defensive plays? lol...ok

Not even sure what you are talking about in the second paragraph.

Originally posted by Time Trial
Also, it is a lolscrim... if you set up anything more than your standard DAI, I'd laugh at you. I did say that you couldn't run it except in lolscrims.



Originally posted by Time Trial
But just to cover this off:

I'd either run a nickel 3 or a dime 4 depending on the down/distance/tagging.

All 3 WRs are in single man coverage, with zone help over/under depending on down/distance/tagging. The HB and TE might be in single man coverage depending on their tag and the down/distance. I may have an under zone, I may have a blitz, I may have a single man cover, I may even have a double man cover in certain situations, depending on the tag.

I don't need to look at what plays you are drawing up... I look at my team's strengths and weaknesses and base my playcalling based on what you are sending out (formation/down/distance/tagging).

You already lost the battle. Don't worry we don't even have to play it out in a bunch of lolscrims.

Originally posted by dbreeze
and more realistic.......

I want you to think about this for a little while and get back to me. And if you still come up with the same answer we obviously aren't talking about the same builds or even remotely the same game.

No, we're not talking about the same game. You're focus seems more on the current game and its limits, and, I understand that the game needs to be playable in the present. I'm talking more about a long term vision and direction for the game. What's the goal here?

Originally posted by Corndog
As long as you're wearing blinders and only looking at it in a vacuum, yes.