power thru
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > Do you think this dot would benefit more from Juke or Spin
RyanCane26
online
online
Originally posted by bhall43
Looks like this is his projected finish?
read it wrong
looks good, i'd sign
Looks like this is his projected finish?
read it wrong
looks good, i'd sign
empty3
offline
offline
Originally posted by empty3
power thru
sorry realized pt is power thru lower the shoulder
power thru
sorry realized pt is power thru lower the shoulder
Originally posted by empty3
power thru
I hate to say this but empty has a point here. With the strength your QB has, why not? You'd have to build the AEQ piece since PT doesn't ever roll for QB's, but it's a thought.
power thru
I hate to say this but empty has a point here. With the strength your QB has, why not? You'd have to build the AEQ piece since PT doesn't ever roll for QB's, but it's a thought.

empty3
offline
offline
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
I hate to say this but empty has a point here. With the strength your QB has, why not? You'd have to build the AEQ piece since PT doesn't ever roll for QB's, but it's a thought.
well you're nice..........................................
I hate to say this but empty has a point here. With the strength your QB has, why not? You'd have to build the AEQ piece since PT doesn't ever roll for QB's, but it's a thought.

well you're nice..........................................
Edited by empty3 on Nov 16, 2013 22:56:54
Originally posted by empty3
well your nice..........................................
you're*
well your nice..........................................
you're*
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
I hate to say this but empty has a point here. With the strength your QB has, why not? You'd have to build the AEQ piece since PT doesn't ever roll for QB's, but it's a thought.
he has 10 powerthrough......
I hate to say this but empty has a point here. With the strength your QB has, why not? You'd have to build the AEQ piece since PT doesn't ever roll for QB's, but it's a thought.

he has 10 powerthrough......
empty3
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Ya guys. PT is already part of his build. Keep up.
i didnt know PT was power thru i posted nvm lower the shoulder
Ya guys. PT is already part of his build. Keep up.
i didnt know PT was power thru i posted nvm lower the shoulder
ChildishGambino
offline
offline
Originally posted by empty3
i didnt know PT was power thru i posted nvm lower the shoulder
Spin > LTS imo.
However I think you could argue replacing hurdle with LTS if you wanted to go that route.
I would guess, and I want to emphasize the guess part, that LTS + 105strength/90 carrying would be more beneficial than Hurdle + 61 jumping on that build.
I'd be interested in hearing what better dot builders think about that.
i didnt know PT was power thru i posted nvm lower the shoulder
Spin > LTS imo.
However I think you could argue replacing hurdle with LTS if you wanted to go that route.
I would guess, and I want to emphasize the guess part, that LTS + 105strength/90 carrying would be more beneficial than Hurdle + 61 jumping on that build.
I'd be interested in hearing what better dot builders think about that.
bhall43
offline
offline
LTS and Hurdle provide different elements. Since Diving tackles seem to be a pretty strong I would argue Hurdle (considering it is a break tackle for diving tackles which are quite common and gets a buff from QF) is currently the better buy. Fires all the time on my PB.
Originally posted by Dustin.
Spin > LTS imo.
However I think you could argue replacing hurdle with LTS if you wanted to go that route.
I would guess, and I want to emphasize the guess part, that LTS + 105strength/90 carrying would be more beneficial than Hurdle + 61 jumping on that build.
I'd be interested in hearing what better dot builders think about that.
absolutely not
Spin > LTS imo.
However I think you could argue replacing hurdle with LTS if you wanted to go that route.
I would guess, and I want to emphasize the guess part, that LTS + 105strength/90 carrying would be more beneficial than Hurdle + 61 jumping on that build.
I'd be interested in hearing what better dot builders think about that.
absolutely not
Just need that diving tackle dimension because he really isn't going to be that fast.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























