Warrior General Games

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
T2 is finally free of his mod title. Multiple times last season he told me he was limited on what the defense can do, because as a mod he is not supposed to embarrass people by shutting them out, lowering GLB moral.

this is probably the same reason CerNet (or was that Catch ~ i'm getting confused, again) wasn't good as a DC... make's such much more sense now

thanks for sharing

Originally posted by Timetoshine-Metta
http://cdn.meme.li/i/pi546.jpg

this kinda dynamite?

lol

Originally posted by Timetoshine-Metta
http://cdn.meme.li/i/pi546.jpg

this kinda dynamite?

I think it was this...

http://tinyurl.com/cr3d7v9

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Your reaching imo. If we start off slow it will be due to my ineptitude, not some stupid chemistry mechanic. People just like to blame things rather than taking personal responsibility.

You do realize a 10 chemistry advantage is equivalent to a mini helmet so imagine going against 2 or 3x that. Not as easy to overcome as it would seem

Originally posted by snakes22


You do realize a 10 chemistry advantage is equivalent to a mini helmet so imagine going against 2 or 3x that. Not as easy to overcome as it would seem

Why say roughly when you mean exactly?

Originally posted by Redass Ranch
this is probably the same reason CerNet (or was that Catch ~ i'm getting confused, again) wasn't good as a DC... make's such much more sense now

thanks for sharing

Yes I pointed this out once, everyone shoulda seen it from far away tbh

Originally posted by jdbolick
It's not surprising that someone who hadn't made the playoffs in four years of trying wouldn't understand the impact of chemistry at this level.

Originally posted by snakes22
I agree, a lot of teams still in the 50s and 60s going to be in trouble

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Your reaching imo. If we start off slow it will be due to my ineptitude, not some stupid chemistry mechanic. People just like to blame things rather than taking personal responsibility.

I think I'd take the word of 2 WL championship .gifs and several playoff appearances over 1 playoff appearance.

Originally posted by sampson_matt
Originally posted by jdbolick

It's not surprising that someone who hadn't made the playoffs in four years of trying wouldn't understand the impact of chemistry at this level.

Originally posted by snakes22

I agree, a lot of teams still in the 50s and 60s going to be in trouble

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN

Your reaching imo. If we start off slow it will be due to my ineptitude, not some stupid chemistry mechanic. People just like to blame things rather than taking personal responsibility.

I think I'd take the word of 2 WL championship .gifs and several playoff appearances over 1 playoff appearance.

Unrelated. Did them explaining away early wins/losses due to chemistry somehow make their past WL success happen? Blaming chemistry for losses is a cop-out. To swap out players is a choice, and 1-2% atty hit is far from a damning advantage ensuring a loss. I wish GLB kept track of mini-helmet win% in WL, because I reckon it would surprise some of you.

Chemistry is the cost of roster turnover. Any game you lose, saying "lolchemistry" is simply pretending the direct choices made by coordinators (or during recruiting) are not a bigger cause. This would be incorrect.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Unrelated. Did them explaining away early wins/losses due to chemistry somehow make their past WL success happen? Blaming chemistry for losses is a cop-out. To swap out players is a choice, and 1-2% atty hit is far from a damning advantage ensuring a loss. I wish GLB kept track of mini-helmet win% in WL, because I reckon it would surprise some of you.
Ugh. If you weren't such an insufferable ass who never bothers to learn from other people to ameliorate your own ignorance you might already know that A) we have previously analyzed the success rate of mini-helmets at this level (they don't guarantee wins, but they matter a lot), and B) we have also documented the effects of chemistry. Congratulations, after four years of trying you finally achieved what some of us do with regularity, but now your next step is to continue making the playoffs, which some of us also do with regularity. Those of us with that experience know that staying up here is a delicate balancing act between improving the roster and not overly damaging chemistry. Chemistry is what can cause the same roster that won the WL to lose its first five games (120-7, 113-17, 65-27, 41-23, 35-0) when the owner forgets to re-sign his entire roster.

What makes you so obnoxious and a constant loser in every single season of your GLB existence except s37 is that you pretend to have knowledge you don't instead of learning from people who genuinely do. Chemistry matters. Had you bothered to ask someone who had made the WL playoffs before, you might have found out how much. Chicago going in with low chem doesn't necessarily mean you'll fail like you have every other time, but it does mean you're treading water with a weight belt.

Wise, chem matters, a lot.....

It may be why last seasons champ may be headed to pro.....we had to replace most of our online along with many others, we will be facing triple helmets the first few games

Lol, chem at that level isn't that big of a deal

Originally posted by jdbolick

Ugh. If you weren't such an insufferable ass who never bothers to learn from other people to ameliorate your own ignorance you might already know that A) we have previously analyzed the success rate of mini-helmets at this level (they don't guarantee wins, but they matter a lot), and B) we have also documented the effects of chemistry. Congratulations, after four years of trying you finally achieved what some of us do with regularity, but now your next step is to continue making the playoffs, which some of us also do with regularity. Those of us with that experience know that staying up here is a delicate balancing act between improving the roster and not overly damaging chemistry. Chemistry is what can cause the same roster that won the WL to lose its first five games (120-7, 113-17, 65-27, 41-23, 35-0) when the owner forgets to re-sign his entire roster.

What makes you so obnoxious and a constant loser in every single season of your GLB existence except s37 is that you pretend to have knowledge you don't instead of learning from people who genuinely do. Chemistry matters. Had you bothered to ask someone who had made the WL playoffs before, you might have found out how much. Chicago going in with low chem doesn't necessarily mean you'll fail like you have every other time, but it does mean you're treading water with a weight belt.

lol

Originally posted by JT_HOOD
lol

and I mean LOL as in lol wise

Originally posted by sampson_matt
I think I'd take the word of 2 WL championship .gifs and several playoff appearances over 1 playoff appearance.

you can't use facts or reason with Wise, he has his own beliefs. He sees things happening to him and is grasping straws when it comes to him understanding what is going on.