Originally posted by Team Nucleus
nothin personal....theres a reason for the limit...
This is personal. The reason for the limit is stupid.
nothin personal....theres a reason for the limit...
This is personal. The reason for the limit is stupid.
Forum > Suggestions > 3 Team Limit (Casual,Regular, Pee Wee)
Dub J
offline
offline
To delve further into my previous post...
what's the difference between half a dozen teams in the same network being in the same league and half a dozen teams owned by the same person?
*waits for someone to fuck up by trying to say network teams don't collude*
what's the difference between half a dozen teams in the same network being in the same league and half a dozen teams owned by the same person?
*waits for someone to fuck up by trying to say network teams don't collude*
Originally posted by Dub J
To delve further into my previous post...
what's the difference between half a dozen teams in the same network being in the same league and half a dozen teams owned by the same person?
*waits for someone to fuck up by trying to say network teams don't collude*
Network teams don't collude
To delve further into my previous post...
what's the difference between half a dozen teams in the same network being in the same league and half a dozen teams owned by the same person?
*waits for someone to fuck up by trying to say network teams don't collude*
Network teams don't collude
fogie55
offline
offline
no problem as long as it doesn't lead to more leagues. i'd like to see the # of leagues cut 30% or more and the waiting list of ownership brought back
+1 for the OP
I understand where "the powers that be" were coming from with the rules about ownership. I was a huge proponent to being able
to own more than one or two of each. I remain that way..... but Vin ? I think where we are now with the site and the way
users have left... Your suggestion Would help. I, for one, would rather see a team OWNED by a human than CPU.
And....... Bort ? This would mean more money spent on Flex. We do still have to pay for our teams !!
I understand where "the powers that be" were coming from with the rules about ownership. I was a huge proponent to being able
to own more than one or two of each. I remain that way..... but Vin ? I think where we are now with the site and the way
users have left... Your suggestion Would help. I, for one, would rather see a team OWNED by a human than CPU.
And....... Bort ? This would mean more money spent on Flex. We do still have to pay for our teams !!
RiverRat2
offline
offline
Originally posted by fogie55
no problem as long as it doesn't lead to more leagues. i'd like to see the # of leagues cut 30% or more and the waiting list of ownership brought back
BRING BACK THE LIST!
no problem as long as it doesn't lead to more leagues. i'd like to see the # of leagues cut 30% or more and the waiting list of ownership brought back
BRING BACK THE LIST!
Originally posted by vinman
Can we get rid of the limit already..makes no sense to me, why can't I own 5 Casual, or 5 Regular teams if I wanted...GLB would rather have CPU teams?
Keep the 9 team limit, but let us have any combination that equals 9.
+1
Can we get rid of the limit already..makes no sense to me, why can't I own 5 Casual, or 5 Regular teams if I wanted...GLB would rather have CPU teams?
Keep the 9 team limit, but let us have any combination that equals 9.
+1
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
