-1 different strokes for different folks.
Forum > Suggestions > Ditch Casual
Originally posted by Dub J
Not to mention it spreads out the userbase.
To Clarify, this is my primary reason for the post.
Dot numbers are hitting a critical point, time to consolidate to maintain playability.
Or advertise like hecko.
Originally posted by fogie55
if the userbase is too thin make the experience better for everyone, don't take away features/elements some people like. ...
I agree....to a point.
Unfortunately I think we have reached that point.
The point being where the dot population can not sustain the broad range of leagues.
If we could see a road to increasing dot numbers, the last thing I would urge is contraction. As I have argued long and hard in the past contraction says the game has issues.
But there is no road there now. Now its a matter of stemming the flow of agents out the door.
And half empty teams in the "competitive" levels of play suggests the flow is increasing.
Not to mention it spreads out the userbase.
To Clarify, this is my primary reason for the post.
Dot numbers are hitting a critical point, time to consolidate to maintain playability.
Or advertise like hecko.
Originally posted by fogie55
if the userbase is too thin make the experience better for everyone, don't take away features/elements some people like. ...
I agree....to a point.
Unfortunately I think we have reached that point.
The point being where the dot population can not sustain the broad range of leagues.
If we could see a road to increasing dot numbers, the last thing I would urge is contraction. As I have argued long and hard in the past contraction says the game has issues.
But there is no road there now. Now its a matter of stemming the flow of agents out the door.
And half empty teams in the "competitive" levels of play suggests the flow is increasing.
Dub J
offline
offline
Yeah, ignore Kelts. He's butthurt about something 9 ways to Sunday. Remember how he melted down in the forums when I was given a loltag?
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kelts
Because you can't compete you call you little buddies and get everyone ban for making rude comments.
Multiple agents have challenged you to a dual. I'll beat your fully boosted rookie team with and unboosted squad.
Can't and don't care are two different things. And not sure what a one and done PW beating a rookie team being built for the long haul proves. I've forgotten more about this game than you will ever learn, jabroni. Go back to your wittle PW forum and stay there.
Because you can't compete you call you little buddies and get everyone ban for making rude comments.
Multiple agents have challenged you to a dual. I'll beat your fully boosted rookie team with and unboosted squad.
Can't and don't care are two different things. And not sure what a one and done PW beating a rookie team being built for the long haul proves. I've forgotten more about this game than you will ever learn, jabroni. Go back to your wittle PW forum and stay there.
Edited by Dub J on Sep 2, 2013 11:07:28
EaglesFan66
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
+1
As well as PW. Both are a waste of server and Bort's time. Not to mention it spreads out the userbase.
+1
+1
As well as PW. Both are a waste of server and Bort's time. Not to mention it spreads out the userbase.
+1
danpenc918
offline
offline
A lot of the forums are a waste to server space as well -- and bring in absolutely no revenue at all.
Where is the suggestion to eliminate them????
Elimination of Casual would cause more of us than you realize to leave -- because we do not have the time to set up AIs but enjoy owning teams.
And we also create players for our teams (and others) as well as spend flex on scrimmages.
Contraction into fewer leagues is the answer -- not eliminating a viable source of income.
Or maybe contract to 12 teams in a conference instead of 16 and have more inter-conference games to make up the difference.
Where is the suggestion to eliminate them????
Elimination of Casual would cause more of us than you realize to leave -- because we do not have the time to set up AIs but enjoy owning teams.
And we also create players for our teams (and others) as well as spend flex on scrimmages.
Contraction into fewer leagues is the answer -- not eliminating a viable source of income.
Or maybe contract to 12 teams in a conference instead of 16 and have more inter-conference games to make up the difference.
RiverRat2
offline
offline
You need less teams in both Normal and Casual leagues.
They need to go back to the waiting list and control the number of teams sold.
This is not good for business but it would be good for the game.
They need to go back to the waiting list and control the number of teams sold.
This is not good for business but it would be good for the game.
Originally posted by RiverRat2
You need less teams in both Normal and Casual leagues.
They need to go back to the waiting list and control the number of teams sold.
This is not good for business but it would be good for the game.
I agree. Then they can add/subtract leagues as demand has it.
I'm not a fan of casual myself, never have been, never will be.... but they still should have that option, if it is their preference.
You need less teams in both Normal and Casual leagues.
They need to go back to the waiting list and control the number of teams sold.
This is not good for business but it would be good for the game.
I agree. Then they can add/subtract leagues as demand has it.
I'm not a fan of casual myself, never have been, never will be.... but they still should have that option, if it is their preference.
LT56
offline
offline
Why would GLB eliminate a revenue stream?
Even if one agent leaves because of the elimination of casual then it was a bad move. And I know more than one agent would quit GLB if they eliminated casual.
logic fail in OP
-1
Even if one agent leaves because of the elimination of casual then it was a bad move. And I know more than one agent would quit GLB if they eliminated casual.
logic fail in OP
-1
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by danpenc918
A lot of the forums are a waste to server space as well -- and bring in absolutely no revenue at all.
lolwut?
The forums are the biggest source of revenue for this site. Get rid of the forums and see how many users are left.
A lot of the forums are a waste to server space as well -- and bring in absolutely no revenue at all.
lolwut?
The forums are the biggest source of revenue for this site. Get rid of the forums and see how many users are left.
Edited by Dub J on Sep 2, 2013 12:42:48
TJ Spikes
offline
offline
Originally posted by RiverRat2
You need less teams in both Normal and Casual leagues.
They need to go back to the waiting list and control the number of teams sold.
This is not good for business but it would be good for the game.
this is exactly right. If they did some kind of RPG "unlock" thing where someone had to earn the right to buy a team, it'd solve a bunch of problems.
You need less teams in both Normal and Casual leagues.
They need to go back to the waiting list and control the number of teams sold.
This is not good for business but it would be good for the game.
this is exactly right. If they did some kind of RPG "unlock" thing where someone had to earn the right to buy a team, it'd solve a bunch of problems.
Yello1 back to his old ways making dumbass suggestions. just to try to find a way for him or his sucky teams to be relevant.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
