User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > What's more important to the GLB community
Page:
 
AlBarsch
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Purple Loki
Having one or two overbearing strengths but having an equal number of weaknesses

or

having no strengths....

and no weaknesses.


I assume you're talking about individual dots as opposed to the entire team. I agree 100% that dots should have two - three attributes very high which will lead to two or three attributes that aren't very strong. I also agree that possession receivers and LOTs are a bit more balanced than other positions and that's OK.

The team itself should have balance - a mix of offensive weapons and a blend of defensive specialists that the coordinators can utilize - although I've seen some teams do quite well by just playing the power or speed game.
Edited by AlBarsch on Aug 8, 2013 06:47:52
 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Both depending on position and use, with unbalanced dots being focused towards the offensive side of the ball and balanced dots being focused towards the defensive side of the ball.

Lots of bad builders in this thread if they think you can't have a balanced dot succeed.
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024

Lots of bad builders in this thread if they think you can't have a balanced dot succeed.


Is that what the thread is about?

pls show me a 160 speed 95 agi powerback succeeding in being a bruiser.

Or a dual threat QB not sucking all day.
 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jampysos
Is that what the thread is about?

pls show me a 160 speed 95 agi powerback succeeding in being a bruiser.

Or a dual threat QB not sucking all day.


You should really respond to my whole post instead of picking out one sentence and taking it out of context. Do you see where I said it depends on position and use? I wrote all of two sentences, it shouldn't be too hard for you to find it.

And there have been plenty of elusive backs with strength and power thru that have succeeded. There have also been pure power and pure scat and pure elusive backs that have succeeded.
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
All I saw was you going against the theme of everyone else choosing one and defending.
Now you choose 'both", and criticize others who have posted. And it's not like any fictional information was spread.

 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jampysos
All I saw was you going against the theme of everyone else choosing one and defending.
Now you choose 'both", and criticize others who have posted. And it's not like any fictional information was spread.



I chose both because that's the correct answer.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Balanced dots are useful for positions without custom slots and maybe a little to help against tagging, but otherwise you want extremes.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
Balanced dots are somewhat useful for positions without custom slots and maybe a little to help against tagging, but otherwise you want extremes.


 
ProfessionalKop
Gangstalicious
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jampysos
Is that what the thread is about?

pls show me a 160 speed 95 agi powerback succeeding in being a bruiser.

Or a dual threat QB not sucking all day.


Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Both depending on position and use, with unbalanced dots being focused towards the offensive side of the ball and balanced dots being focused towards the defensive side of the ball.

Lots of bad builders in this thread if they think you can't have a balanced dot succeed.


no wonder your own network kicks you off teams.
 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
no wonder your own network kicks you off teams.


What the hell are you talking about?
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
no wonder your own network kicks you off teams.


I own the net work nitwit.

Fucking canadians these days, dumb as fuck. Stick to speaking french, because you obviously don't know English.
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
What the hell are you talking about?


I think he is trying to say one of the teams I brought into my network removed me as a lolgm and that that somehow matters?
 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jampysos
I think he is trying to say one of the teams I brought into my network removed me as a lolgm and that that somehow matters?


Oh, I thought he was saying that my network kicks me off teams and I was like "lol wut?".
 
Jampy2.0
thuggin'
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Oh, I thought he was saying that my network kicks me off teams and I was like "lol wut?".


What he said is just about as stupid ^
 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Apparently PK doesn't know how to quote just like he doesn't know what it's like to have great sex with a real woman.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.